LitCovid-sentences  

PMC:7386785 / 90674-94838 JSONTXT 9 Projects

Annnotations TAB TSV DIC JSON TextAE

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T953 0-21 Sentence denotes Study characteristics
T954 22-1056 Sentence denotes Patient Sampling Purpose: to identify the clinical features and CT manifestations of COVID‐19 and compare them with those of pneumonia occurring in patients who do not have COVID‐19Design: cross‐sectional single‐centre retrospective studyRecruitment: pneumonia patients who presented at a fever observation department in ShanghaiSample size: n = 33 (11 cases)Inclusion criteria: patients with clinical and radiological features of pneumonia, and a normal or reduced total leukocyte count or total lymphocyte count, plus an epidemiologic history that included travel or a history of residence in Hubei province or other areas where continuous transmission of local cases occurred within 14 days before onset of symptoms, a history of contact with patients who had fever or respiratory symptoms and were from Hubei province or other areas with continuous transmission of local cases within 14 days before onset of the disease, or clustering or epidemiologic association with the new coronavirus infectionExclusion criteria: not defined
T955 1057-1180 Sentence denotes Patient characteristics and setting Facility cases: confirmed case: positive RT‐PCR test result obtained by a throat swab.
T956 1181-1332 Sentence denotes Test was repeated when the first test was negativeFacility controls: pneumonia patients confirmed not to be infected by SARS‐Cov2 (2 PCR tests)Country:
T957 1333-1344 Sentence denotes ChinaDates:
T958 1345-1787 Sentence denotes 19 January 2020‐6 February 2020Symptoms and severity: pneumonia was defined as patients with at least 1 clinical symptom (i.e. cough, sputum, fever, dyspnoea, or pleuritic chest pain), a finding of either coarse crackles on auscultation or elevated inflammatory biomarkers, and observation of a new pulmonary opacification on chest CTDemographics: median age +‐ SD cases 50.36 +‐ 15.5, controls 43.59 +‐ 16.02, gender distribution cases (M/F:
T959 1788-1808 Sentence denotes 8/3), controls (M/F:
T960 1809-1948 Sentence denotes 7/15)Exposure history: cases 8/11, controls 7/22 (in the last 14 days with patients with fever or respiratory symptoms or with known cases)
T961 1949-1967 Sentence denotes Index tests Fever
T962 1968-1973 Sentence denotes Cough
T963 1974-1980 Sentence denotes Sputum
T964 1981-2000 Sentence denotes Shortness of breath
T965 2001-2012 Sentence denotes Muscle ache
T966 2013-2022 Sentence denotes Diarrhoea
T967 2023-2034 Sentence denotes Sore throat
T968 2035-2056 Sentence denotes Peak body temperature
T969 2057-2123 Sentence denotes Target condition and reference standard(s) TC: COVID‐19 pneumonia
T970 2124-2167 Sentence denotes RS: RT‐PCR testing on throat swab specimens
T971 2168-2218 Sentence denotes Tests were repeated if the first test was negative
T972 2219-2430 Sentence denotes Flow and timing Time interval not specified, reference test at day 0 (or later when the first test was negative), index tests were questionnaired at day 0 for the presence of symptoms in the past period of time
T973 2431-2445 Sentence denotes Comparative  
T974 2446-2454 Sentence denotes Notes  
T975 2455-2477 Sentence denotes Methodological quality
T976 2478-2543 Sentence denotes Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
T977 2544-2553 Sentence denotes DOMAIN 1:
T978 2554-2571 Sentence denotes Patient Selection
T979 2572-2628 Sentence denotes Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled?
T980 2630-2643 Sentence denotes Unclear    
T981 2644-2678 Sentence denotes Was a case‐control design avoided?
T982 2680-2689 Sentence denotes Yes    
T983 2690-2735 Sentence denotes Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions?
T984 2737-2750 Sentence denotes Unclear    
T985 2751-2796 Sentence denotes Did the study avoid inappropriate inclusions?
T986 2798-2806 Sentence denotes No    
T987 2807-2877 Sentence denotes Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   High risk  
T988 2878-2981 Sentence denotes Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     High
T989 2982-2991 Sentence denotes DOMAIN 2:
T990 2992-3014 Sentence denotes Index Test (All tests)
T991 3015-3114 Sentence denotes Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard?
T992 3116-3125 Sentence denotes Yes    
T993 3126-3172 Sentence denotes If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified?
T994 3174-3182 Sentence denotes No    
T995 3183-3275 Sentence denotes Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias?   High risk  
T996 3276-3398 Sentence denotes Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question?     Low concern
T997 3399-3408 Sentence denotes DOMAIN 3:
T998 3409-3427 Sentence denotes Reference Standard
T999 3428-3505 Sentence denotes Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition?
T1000 3507-3516 Sentence denotes Yes    
T1001 3517-3617 Sentence denotes Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests?
T1002 3619-3632 Sentence denotes Unclear    
T1003 3633-3735 Sentence denotes Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
T1004 3736-3865 Sentence denotes Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
T1005 3866-3875 Sentence denotes DOMAIN 4:
T1006 3876-3891 Sentence denotes Flow and Timing
T1007 3892-3968 Sentence denotes Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard?
T1008 3970-3983 Sentence denotes Unclear    
T1009 3984-4037 Sentence denotes Did all patients receive the same reference standard?
T1010 4039-4048 Sentence denotes Yes    
T1011 4049-4092 Sentence denotes Were all patients included in the analysis?
T1012 4094-4103 Sentence denotes Yes    
T1013 4104-4164 Sentence denotes Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Low risk