PMC:3333881 JSONTXT 24 Projects

Human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat activates NF-κB via physical interaction with IκB-α and p65 Abstract Nuclear factor (NF)-κB is a master regulator of pro-inflammatory genes and is upregulated in human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection. Mechanisms underlying the NF-κB deregulation by HIV-1 are relevant for immune dysfunction in AIDS. We report that in single round HIV-1 infection, or single-pulse PMA stimulation, the HIV-1 Tat transactivator activated NF-κB by hijacking the inhibitor IκB-α and by preventing the repressor binding to the NF-κB complex. Moreover, Tat associated with the p65 subunit of NF-κB and increased the p65 DNA-binding affinity and transcriptional activity. The arginine- and cysteine-rich domains of Tat were required for IκB-α and p65 association, respectively, and for sustaining the NF-κB activity. Among an array of NF-κB-responsive genes, Tat mostly activated the MIP-1α expression in a p65-dependent manner, and bound to the MIP-1α NF-κB enhancer thus promoting the recruitment of p65 with displacement of IκB-α; similar findings were obtained for the NF-κB-responsive genes CSF3, LTA, NFKBIA and TLR2. Our results support a novel mechanism of NF-κB activation via physical interaction of Tat with IκB-α and p65, and may contribute to further insights into the deregulation of the inflammatory response by HIV-1. INTRODUCTION Nuclear factor (NF)-κB transcription factors regulate the transcription of genes that are involved in the immune and inflammatory response (1). The NF-κB family includes RelA/p65, c-Rel, RelB, p50 and p52 that share a highly conserved 300-amino acid Rel homology domain (RHD) for homo- or hetero-dimerization and DNA-binding. The transcriptional activity of the NF-κB complex depends on dimer composition since C-terminal unrelated transcriptional activation domains are present exclusively in p65, RelB and c-Rel (2). Inhibitors of NF-κB (IκB) associate with the NF-κB complex and interfere with its binding to DNA (3). In the canonical pathway of NF-κB activation, the activated IκB kinase (IKK) phosphorylates IκB at specific serine residues that target the protein to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, which releases the functional NF-κB complex in the nucleus. IκB-α, the most abundant inhibitor of NF-κB (4), is phosphorylated by IKK at Ser32 and Ser36 (5), and subsequently ubiquitylated at Lys21 and Lys22 to be degraded by the 26S proteasome (6). The NF-κB activity is enhanced by phosphorylation of p65 at Ser276 by PKA and MSK1 (7,8), Ser311 by PKCζ (9) and Ser536 by IKKα (10,11). Acetylation of p65 at Lys218 and Lys221 increases the DNA binding and impairs the association with IκB-α, and acetylation at Lys310 enhances the p65 transcriptional activity (12,13). Post-activation turn off of NF-κB is regulated by negative feedback loop through inhibitors under the transcriptional control of NF-κB, such as IκB-α and ubiquitin-editing protein A20 (14–20). Deacetylation of p65 by histone deacetylase-3 or SIRT1, or acetylation of p65 at Lys122 and Lys123 down-regulate the NF-κB activity (12,21,22). Persistent activation of NF-κB occurs in human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)-infected monocytes, macrophages and microglia, and enhances the expression of NF-κB-responsive genes, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, cell adhesion molecules and chemokines (23–25). Chronic inflammation is a major cause of immune and neuron dysfunction in AIDS (26,27). Consistently, non-human primate hosts for simian immunodeficiency virus, such as African green monkeys and sooty mangabey, lack aberrant immune activation and do not develop AIDS despite high virus replication (28,29). Thus, understanding the mechanisms of NF-κB deregulation by HIV-1 may provide further insights into AIDS pathogenesis. In HIV-1 entry, the binding of the gp120 viral envelope to CD4 induces the NF-κB activity by activation of IKK (30) and procaspase 8 (31). Following viral integration, the early encoded HIV-1 Tat protein interacts with the HIV-1 RNA and host cell factors to sustain the viral replication. Tat binds to RNA stem-loop structures generated by the 5′ end of target transcripts, including the HIV-1 transactivation-responsive element (TAR) (32), tumor necrosis factor β (TNFβ) (33) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (34) to activate gene transcription. Indeed, Tat promotes the transcriptional initiation and elongation by interacting with transacting factors and cofactors, such as Sp1 (35), TFIID (36), E2F-4 (37), C/EBPβ (38), cyclin T1/CDK9 (39,40) and the histone acetyltransferases p300/CBP and P/CAF (41–43). When released from HIV-1-infected cells, Tat deregulates the cell signaling by binding to cell receptors, such as integrins (44), Flk1/KDR receptor (45) and chemokine receptors (46). We first reported that NF-κB was constitutively active in Jurkat cells that stably expressed the Tat gene (47). Following gene transfection or protein transduction, Tat induced the IKK activity and proteasomal degradation of IκB-α (48), and increased the p65 transcriptional activity by inhibiting the SIRT-1-mediated deacetylation of p65 Lys310 (49). These findings suggested that Tat modulates crucial enzymes involved in NF-κB signaling; however, it was unclear how Tat could subvert the negative feedback of NF-κB, which is mainly dependent on de novo synthesis of IκB-α (15,17). We previously found that IκB-α binds to Tat and promotes the nuclear export of the viral transactivator (50,51). In this study, we report that Tat counteracts the post-activation turn off of NF-κB through direct interaction with IκB-α and p65, which enhances the DNA binding and transcriptional activity of the NF-κB complex. The new mechanism of NF-κB deregulation here described may provide further insights into the chronic immune activation of HIV-1 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plasmids The plasmids pcDNA-3xHA-IκB-α, p3xFLAG-CMV-Tat, p3xFLAG-CMV-Tat C(22,25,27)A, p3xFLAG-CMV-Tat R(49,52,53,55,56,57)A, pGEX-2T-Tat, pGEX-2T-Tat C(22,25,27)A and pGEX-2T-Tat R(49,52,53,55,56,57)A were previously described (50). The plasmids pNL4-3.Luc.R-E- and pHXB2-env were obtained from the AIDS Research & Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, USA; pκBluc and pSV-β-Gal were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The plasmids pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65, pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65ΔC(1–318), pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65ΔN(122–551), p3xFLAG-CMV-Tat T,N(23,24)A, p3xFLAG-CMV-Tat K(50,51)A, pGEX-2T-Tat T,N(23,24)A, pGEX-2T-Tat K(50,51)A and pNL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R-E- were generated as described in Supplementary Data. Cells, transfection, treatments and luciferase assay HeLa, p50−/−p65−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (52) and 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; Jurkat, U937 cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cultured in RPMI 1640. PBMCs were isolated as previously described (53). Media were supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum and 2 mM l-glutamine (Lonza Cologne AG, Germany). HeLa, p50−/−p65−/− MEFs and 293T were transfected with DNA by using FuGENE HD (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), according to the manufacturer's protocol; total DNA amounts were equalized by transfection of pRc/CMV empty vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For pulse-stimulation, HeLa cells were treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) (20 ng/ml) for 5 min, or tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α; Sigma-Aldrich) (20 ng/ml) for 30 min, washed twice in complete culture medium and then returned to culture. For luciferase assays, pSV-β-Gal was co-transfected with pκBluc to monitor the transfection efficiency. Forty-eight-hour post-transfection, cells were lysed in lysis buffer of Dual Light Luciferase System (Tropix, Bedford, MA, USA) and the luciferase and β-galactosidase activities were evaluated by using Dual Light Luciferase System (Tropix) in a bioluminometer (Turner Biosystem, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The ratio of firefly luciferase activity to β-galactosidase activity was expressed as relative light units. RNA interference Jurkat or U937 cells were transfected by electroporation using a Bio-Rad apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Briefly, aliquots (5 × 106 cells) were suspended in 0.3 ml of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum and subjected to a double electrical pulse (0.22 V, 960 µF) in the presence of annealed siRNA (200 pmol); electroporated cells were washed and cultured in complete medium. RNA interference was performed with: siRNA Tat sense, CUGCUUGUACCAAUUGCUAUU and siRNA Tat antisense, UAGCAAUUGGUACAAGCAGUU; siRNA control sense, CUGCUUGUCACA AUUGCUAUU and siRNA control antisense, UAGCAAUUGUGACAAGCAGUU. RNA interference of p65 and IκB-α was performed with SMART pool siRNA p65 and IκB-α (Dharmacon, Chicago, IL, USA). Pseudotyped virions and single round infection 293T cells (1 × 107) were transfected with pNL4-3.Luc.R-E- or pNL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R-E- (10 µg) together with pHXB2 Env (10 µg), and 48-h post-transfection cell supernatant was collected. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using anti-p24 antibody measured virion concentration. PBMCs, Jurkat or U937 cells (5 × 107) were infected with HXB2 Env-pseudotyped virions (500 ng of p24) by spinoculation, as previously described (50). Cell extracts, western blotting, IKK activity and NF-κB DNA binding Total, nuclear and cytosolic extracts were performed as previously described (54); details are reported in Supplementary Data. Western blotting analysis was performed by resuspending protein aliquots in loading buffer (125 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 5% SDS, 1% bromophenol blue, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 25% glycerol), resolved on 12% SDS–PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and incubated with primary antibodies (1:1000) followed by incubation with horseradish-peroxidase-linked mouse or rabbit IgG (1:2000) (GE Healthcare Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) in PBS containing 5% non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Proteins were detected by chemiluminescence using the ECL System (GE Healthcare Amersham). Primary antibodies were purchased from: Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA (anti-HA F7, anti-IκB-α C15, anti-Histone H1, anti-Hexokinase-II); Sigma-Aldrich (anti-FLAG M2, anti-γ-Tubulin); Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, USA (anti-p65). Densitometry of single bands was analysed by ImageJ software package (NIH, USA). IKK activity was evaluated in cytosolic extracts using the HTScan IKK kinase assay kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Binding of p65, p50 and FLAG-Tat to the double-stranded NF-κB oligonucleotide was measured using NF-κB Combo Transcription Factor Assay kit (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) was performed as previously described (55); details are described in Supplementary Data. In vitro translation HA-IκB-α, p65 and Tat were expressed under the T7 promoter and in vitro translated using the TnT quick coupled transcription/translation system (Promega), as previously reported (50). Details are described in Supplementary Data. Immunoprecipitation assay and GST-pull down Immunoprecipitation, GST-pull down, and production of GST proteins in Escherichia coli strain BL21 were performed as previously reported (50). Details are described in Supplementary Data. Real-time PCR Total RNA was extracted from cells by using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen); RNA aliquots (200 ng) were reverse transcribed using Random Examers (Roche) and Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Real-time PCR was performed with the iQ Green Super mix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and carried out with the iCycler iQ Real-Time detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) under the following conditions: 95°C, 1 min; (94°C, 10 s; 60°C, 30 s) ×40. Primers for Tat and MIP-1α are listed in Supplementary Data. Real-time PCR of CSF3, LTA, NFKBIA, TLR2, GAPDH and ACTB was performed using the RT2 profiler PCR Array-Human NF-κB signaling pathway (QIAGEN Sciences, MD, USA). Reactions were carried out in triplicate, and gene expression levels were calculated relative to GAPDH mRNA levels as endogenous control. Relative expression was calculated as 2(Ct gene under investigation − Ct GAPDH). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay Cells were fixed by adding formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) at the final concentration of 1%. After 10 min, ice-cold PBS plus 0.125 M glycine was added, and plates were transferred on ice, washed extensively with PBS, and scraped. After centrifugation, cells were 10 min lysed in lysis buffer (5 mM PIPES pH 8.0, 85 mM KCl, 0.5% NP-40) supplemented with 1× Complete Protease Inhibitor (Roche Diagnostic GmbH). Nuclei were pelletted (1000 × g, 5 min), and resuspended in sonication buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA). Chromatin was sonicated using Bandelin Sonoplus GM70 (Bandelin Electronic, Berlin, Germany), centrifuged (14 000 × g, 15 min), and supernatant was 10-fold diluted in dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 16.7 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1.1% Triton X-100, 167 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM EDTA). Samples were pre-cleared by 3-h incubation with 20 µl of protein G agarose beads followed by incubation with antibodies against the analysed proteins. Primary antibodies were: anti-p65 (sc-372), anti-IκBα (sc-203) and rabbit IgG (sc-2027) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; anti-FLAG M2 from Sigma–Aldrich. Immunoprecipitations were carried out at 4°C overnight and immune complexes were collected with protein G agarose beads, washed five times with low salt buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl), four times with high salt buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl), once with TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), and extracted in TE buffer containing 2% SDS. Protein–DNA cross-links were reverted by heating at 65°C overnight. DNA was further purified by QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN) and eluted in 50 µl sterile distilled water. Specific enrichment in NF-κB enhancer sequences was measured by real-time PCR of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) eluates using SYBR GreenER Master Mix (Invitrogen). Reactions were carried out with the iCycler iQ Real-Time detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using the following conditions: 95°C, 1 min; (94°C, 10 s; 60°C, 30 s) ×40. Primers used for MIP-1α, GAPDH and ACTB are listed in Supplementary Data. Real-time PCR of CSF3, LTA, NFKBIA and TLR2 were performed using the Custom ChIP array (QIAGEN). For each sample, values were normalized to input DNA and reported as % of input over the rabbit IgG control. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed by two-tail unpaired Student's t-test. Data were reported as means ± SE. Differences between the means were considered as statistically significant at the 95% level (P < 0.05). RESULTS Tat enhances the NF-κB activity by hijacking IκB-α and inhibiting the post-activation turn off of NF-κB We analysed the kinetic of NF-κB activation in single round HIV-1 infection by modulating the expression of Tat with RNA interference. Jurkat cells were transfected with siRNA Tat, siRNA control, or left untransfected, and 24 h later cells were infected with HXB2 Env-pseudotyped NL4-3.Luc.R−E− virions. By cytofluorimetric analysis, ∼40% of cells was siRNA-transfected and HIV-1-infected at 12-h post-infection (Supplementary Figure S1). The expression of Tat was detected at 1-h post-infection and progressively increased up to 12 h in untransfected and siRNA control-transfected cells, while it was barely detected in siRNA Tat-transfected cells (Figure 1A). The LTR-dependent luciferase expression was also progressively induced at 1- to 12-h post-infection in untransfected and siRNA control-transfected cells, while it was barely observed in siRNA Tat-transfected cells, as expected for the Tat-dependent transactivation of the HIV-1 LTR (Figure 1A). Figure 1. Tat counteracts the post-activation turn off of NF-κB in single round HIV-1-infection. Jurkat cells (5 × 107) were transfected with siRNA Tat or siRNA control (2 nmol), or left untransfected; 24 h later, cells were infected with HXB2-pseudotyped NL4-3.Luc.R−E− virions (500 ng of p24) and harvested at the indicated time. (A) Tat expression was measured in total RNA by real-time PCR, while the luciferase activity was measured in whole cell extracts. (B) Nuclear extracts (10 µg) were analysed for the p65 and p50 binding to the NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide using the NF-κB Transcription Factor ELISA Assay kit (Cayman). (C) The expression of p65 and IκB-α was analysed by 12% SDS–PAGE and western blotting of nuclear or cytosolic extracts (20 µg) using anti-p65 and anti-IκB-α antibodies. Histone H1 and Hexokinase II were detected with specific antibodies as markers of nuclear and cytosolic extracts, respectively. Densitometry values (D) of the bands were expressed as fold increase above the control (mock). (D) IKK activity was measured in cytosolic extracts (100 µg) by using HTScan IKK Kinase Assay (Cell Signaling Technology). Values (mean ± SE, n = 3) are shown. The progressive increase in NF-κB activity, as measured by p65–p50 binding to an NF-κB consensus oligonucleotide (Figure 1B) and nuclear p65 (Figure 1C, nucleus), was observed at 1- to 3-h post-infection in both Tat-positive (no siRNA or siRNA control) and Tat-negative (siRNA Tat) cells; however, at 12-h post-infection, the p65 DNA binding and nuclear p65 persisted elevated in presence of Tat (no siRNA and siRNA control), while they dropped in absence of Tat (siRNA Tat) (Figure 1B and C). IκB-α was degraded in the cytosol within 3-h post-infection and de novo synthesized at 6 h with full replenishment at 12-h post-infection in both Tat-positive and Tat-negative cells (Figure 1C, cytosol). Consistently, the IKK activity was induced at 1-h post-infection, and decreased at 3-h post-infection independently of the presence of Tat (Figure 1D). Similar kinetics of NF-κB activity, IKK activation and IκB-α degradation/re-synthesis were observed in single-round HIV-1 infection of PBMCs using a cocktail of Azidothymidine (AZT) and Lamivudine (3TC) as reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Supplementary Figure S2). These results indicated that in single-round HIV-1 infection the NF-κB activation initially correlated with the IKK activation and IκB-α degradation independently of the presence of Tat, and it was kept elevated in presence of Tat following the decay of the IKK activity and new synthesis of IκB-α. Next, we tested the single action of Tat on the kinetic of NF-κB activity induced by PMA. To this end, HeLa cells were transfected with p3x-FLAG-Tat, or empty vector, stimulated with PMA for 5 min, and extensively washed to avoid the oscillatory kinetic of NF-κB activation (17,18). In un-stimulated cells, the p65 DNA binding (Figure 2A) and nuclear p65 (Figure 2B, nucleus) were slightly enhanced by Tat, while the IκB-α content was not significantly affected (Figure 2B, cytosol). Transient stimulation with PMA increased the NF-κB DNA binding activity and nuclear p65 at 5 min peaking at 60–120 min independently of the presence of Tat (Figure 2A and B); however, while the p65 DNA binding and nuclear p65 persisted elevated at 240-min post-treatment in Tat-positive cells, they dropped in Tat-negative cells (Figure 2A and B). In addition, Tat bound to the NF-κB oligonucleotide in un-stimulated cells and its binding increased following PMA stimulation (Figure 2A), suggesting that the viral protein was a component of the NF-κB complex bound to DNA. Degradation of IκB-α was progressively induced at 5–30 min, followed by de novo synthesis at 60 min with full replenishment at 240 min in both Tat-positive and negative cells (Figure 2B, cytosol). Consistently, the IKK activation started at 5 min, and turned off at 30 min independently of the presence of Tat (Figure 2C). These results indicated that Tat enhanced the NF-κB activity in un-stimulated and PMA-stimulated cells without affecting the IKK activity and IκB-α content. Figure 2. Tat enhances the NF-κB activity following PMA stimulation by associating with IκB-α and counteracting the NF-κB repression. HeLa cells (5 × 106) were transfected with p3xFLAG-Tat or p3xFLAG empty vector (5 µg), and 48 h later were stimulated with PMA (5 min, 20 ng/ml) or left unstimulated, washed twice with DMEM and harvested at the indicated times. Nuclear and cytosolic extracts were prepared for further analysis. (A) Nuclear extracts were analysed for the p65, p50 and FLAG-Tat binding to the NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide using the NF-κB Transcription Factor ELISA assay kit (Cayman). (B) Nuclear and cytosolic extracts (20 µg) were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting using the anti-p65, anti-FLAG, anti-Histone H1, anti-IκB-α and anti-Hexokinase-II antibodies. Densitometry values (D) of the bands were expressed as fold increase above the control (lane 1). (C) IKK activity was measured in cytosolic extracts (100 µg) by using HTScan IKK kinase assay (Cell Signaling Technology). (D) HeLa cells (5 × 106) were transfected with or without p3xFLAG-Tat (5 µg); 48 h later, cells were stimulated with PMA (5 min, 20 ng/ml) or left unstimulated, washed twice with DMEM, and harvested after 240 min. Whole cell extracts (1 mg) were immunoprecipitated with protein G-Sepharose-coupled anti-IκB-α antibody. Immunocomplexes were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-p65, anti-FLAG and anti-IκB-α antibodies. Densitometry values (D) of the bands were expressed as fold increase above the control (lane 1). Values (mean ± SE, n = 3) are shown. As we previously found that Tat binds to the sixth ankyrin of IκB-α (50,51), we tested whether Tat counteracted the generation of the IκB-α/NF-κB complex. To this end, the association of IκB-α with p65 was analysed in vivo at 0 and 240 min after short-pulse PMA, which corresponded to the time of un-stimulated condition and post-activation de novo synthesis of IκB-α, respectively. Coimmunoprecipitation of IκB-α with p65 was detected at 0- and 240-min post-treatment in Tat-negative cells (Figure 2D, lanes 1 and 3), and was halved in Tat-positive cells, where Tat coimmunoprecipitated with IκB-α (Figure 2D, lanes 2 and 4), indicating that Tat competed the IκB-α binding to p65. Tat counteracts the IκB-α inhibition of p65 by competing the repressor binding We further investigated the physical interaction of Tat with IκB-α using in vitro translated proteins in coimmunoprecipitation assays. For mapping the interaction domains, we used the following Tat mutants: Tat T,N(23,24)A, Tat C(22,25,27)A, Tat K(50,51)A and Tat R(49–57)A (Figure 3A). IκB-α coimmunoprecipitated with all Tat proteins, except Tat R(49–57)A (Figure 3B). These results indicated that the arginine-rich domain of Tat was involved in the binding to IκB-α, which was consistent with previous observations (50,51). Moreover, Tat associating with IκB-α competed the binding of IκB-α to p65 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3C, lanes 3–5), while Tat R(49–57)A, which lacked the binding site for IκB-α, did not associate with IκB-α and did not compete the binding of IκB-α to p65 (Figure 3C, lanes 6–8). Figure 3. Tat relieves p65 from the IκB-α inhibition. (A) Schematic representation of wild-type and mutant Tat proteins. (B) HA-IκB-α (5 µl) was incubated in presence or absence of FLAG-Tat, FLAG-Tat T,N(23,24)A, FLAG-Tat K(50,51)A, FLAG-Tat R(49–57)A or FLAG-Tat C(22,25,27)A (10 µl) using in vitro translated proteins. Wild-type and mutant Tat proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody; immunocomplexes were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-HA and anti-FLAG antibodies. (C) 35S-methionine-labeled p65 (5 µl) was incubated with in vitro translated HA-IκB-α (5 µl) in presence or absence of FLAG-Tat or FLAG-Tat R(49–57)A (5, 10 or 20 µl). HA-IκB-α was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody; immunocomplexes were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-HA and anti-FLAG antibodies, or autoradiography (35S-Met-p65). Densitometry values (D) of the bands were expressed as fold increase above the control (lane 1). (D) The p65 DNA binding activity was analysed by EMSA using in vitro translated proteins. 32P-labeled-NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide was incubated with p65 (0.5 µl) in presence or absence of HA-IκB-α (1 µl), FLAG-Tat or FLAG-Tat R(49–57)A (5 and 10 µl); competition of DNA binding was performed with 10 - up to 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide. DNA/protein complexes were run on 6% PAGE–TBE and analysed by autoradiography. (E) p50−/−p65−/−MEFs (3 × 105 cells) were transfected with pκBLuc (0.5 µg) and pSV-β-Gal (0.1 µg) with or without pRc/CMV-p65 (0.5 µg), pCMV4-HA-IκB-α (0.5 µg), p3xFLAG-Tat or p3xFLAG-Tat R(49–57)A (0.5, 1 and 2 µg). The luciferase activity was measured in cell extracts 48-h post-transfection and normalized to β-galactosidase activity. Fold activation was calculated relative to transfection of the pκBLuc plasmid alone. Values (mean ± SE, n = 3) are shown. As control of protein expression, aliquots of cell extracts (20 µg) were analysed by western blotting with anti-p65, anti-HA, anti-FLAG and anti-γ-tubulin antibodies. Next, we evaluated whether Tat counteracted the IκB-α-mediated inhibition of p65 binding to DNA by incubating in vitro translated p65 and IκB-α proteins with the NF-κB probe in presence or absence of Tat followed by EMSA. The p65 DNA binding activity was inhibited by IκB-α and restored in a dose-dependent manner by wild-type Tat, and not by Tat R(49–57) (Figure 3D). Further, we analysed the Tat effect on the IκB-α repression of p65 transcriptional activity by transfecting p50−/−p65−/−MEFs with the NF-κB-Luc reporter together with expression vectors of p65 and IκB-α, in presence or absence of Tat. IκB-α inhibited the p65-dependent expression of the luciferase gene, which was restored in a dose-dependent manner by wild-type Tat, and not by Tat R(49–57)A (Figure 3E). Altogether these results indicated that Tat counteracts the IκB-α repression of the p65 DNA-binding and transcriptional activity by associating with IκB-α and competing the repressor binding to p65. Tat increases the p65 affinity binding to DNA through association with p65 We tested whether Tat physically interacted with p65. HeLa cells were transfected with the expression vectors of HA-p65 and FLAG-Tat, and 24 h later Tat was immunoprecipitated from cell extracts. The p65 protein was coimmunoprecipitated with wild-type Tat or the mutants Tat T,N(23,24)A, Tat K(50,51)A and Tat R(49–57)A at similar levels, while a significant decrease in coimmunoprecipitation was observed for Tat C(22,25,27)A (Figure 4A). Consistently, GST-pull down of in vitro translated proteins showed the direct binding of p65 to wild-type Tat, or the mutants Tat T,N(23,24)A, Tat K(50,51)A and Tat R(49–57)A, and lack of binding to Tat C(22,25,27)A (Figure 4B). These results indicated that Tat associated with p65 through the cysteine-rich domain and ruled-out the requirement of bridging proteins to mediate such interaction. Figure 4. Tat associates with p65 increasing its DNA-affinity binding. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65 (5 µg) in presence or absence of p3xFLAG-Tat, p3xFLAG-Tat T,N(23,24)A, p3xFLAG-Tat K(50,51)A, p3xFLAG-Tat R(49–57)A, or p3xFLAG-Tat C(22,25,27)A (5 µg). FLAG-Tat proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody; immunocomplexes were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibodies. (B) In vitro translated p65 (5 µl) was incubated with GST-Tat, GST-Tat T,N(23,24)A, GST-Tat K(50,51)A, GST-Tat R(49–57)A, GST-Tat C(22,25,27)A, or GST (5 µg) conjugated with Glutathione-Sepharose. Protein complexes were recovered by GST-pull down, separated by 12% SDS–PAGE, and analysed by western blotting with anti-p65 or anti-GST antibodies. (C) Schematic representation of wild-type and mutant p65 proteins. (D) HeLa cells were transfected with p3xFLAG-Tat (5 µg) in the presence or absence of pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65, pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65ΔC (1–318), or pRc/CMV-3xHA-p65ΔN (122–551) (5 µg). Wild-type and mutant HA-p65 proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody; immunocomplexes were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibodies. (E) Recombinant p65 protein (100 ng; Active Motif Carlsbad, CA, USA) was 20 min incubated with 32P-labeled NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide in presence or absence of in vitro translated FLAG-Tat or FLAG-Tat C(22,25,27)A (5 µl); competitions were performed with 1.25- up to 40-fold molar excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide. DNA/protein complexes were separated by 6% PAGE in 0.5 × TBE buffer and analysed by autoradiography. (F) Densitometry of band-shifts shown in E. To identify the p65 domain required for binding to Tat, HeLa cells were transfected with FLAG-Tat together with HA-p65 mutants, which were deleted of the transactivation domain [p65ΔC (1–318)], or the RHD [p65ΔN (122–551)] (Figure 4C). Tat coimmunoprecipitated with p65ΔC (1–318), and not with p65ΔN (122–551) (Figure 4D), indicating that the RHD of p65 was involved in the physical interaction with Tat. To address the effect of Tat on the p65 DNA-binding affinity, purified recombinant p65 protein was incubated with 32P-labeled-NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide in presence or absence of wild-type Tat or Tat C(22,25,27)A, and p65 DNA-binding was analysed by EMSA. Whereas wild-type Tat significantly increased the binding of p65 to DNA, the mutant Tat C(22,25,27)A, lacking the binding site for p65, was ineffective (Figure 4E). The p65 binding to DNA was evaluated by competition with increasing amounts of cold competitor NF-κB oligonucleotide, which showed that Tat significantly enhanced the p65 affinity binding to DNA (Figure 4E and F). Tat activates the p65-dependent expression of NF-κB-responsive genes, occupies the NF-κB enhancers and promotes the p65 recruitment with IκB-α displacement We analysed the action of Tat on the expression of NF-κB-responsive genes in vivo. To this end, HeLa cells were transfected with FLAG-Tat, FLAG-Tat C(22,25,27)A or FLAG-Tat R(49–57)A, and 48 h later the expression of a number of NF-κB-dependent genes was analysed by real-time PCR. Tat significantly increased the expression of MIP-1α, CSF3, LTA, NFKBIA and TLR2, while the mutants Tat C(22,25,27)A and Tat R(49–57)A were ineffective (Figure 5A–E). The Tat-dependent transactivation of the NF-κB-dependent genes was abolished when cells were transfected with siRNA p65, indicating that the Tat transcriptional activation was mediated by p65 (Figure 5A–E). Differently, the expression of the NF-κB-independent genes GAPDH and ACTB was unaffected by wild-type and Tat mutants (Figure 5F and G). These results were consistent with the requirement of both the cysteine-rich and arginine-rich domains of Tat to enhance the NF-κB activity, suggesting that the up-regulation of NF-κB-responsive genes by Tat might occur through physical interaction of the viral protein with p65 and IκB-α. Figure 5. Tat activates the p65-dependent expression of NF-κB-responsive genes by occupying the NF-κB enhancers and promoting the p65 recruitment with IκB-α displacement. HeLa cells (5 × 106) were transfected with p3xFLAG-Tat, p3xFLAG-Tat C(22,25,27), p3xFLAG-Tat R(49–57) or empty vector (10 µg); for p65 RNA interference, cells (5 × 106) were transfected with p3xFLAG-Tat (10 µg) and siRNA p65 or siRNA control (200 pmol). Twenty-four-hour post-transfection, total RNA was extracted and analysed by real-time PCR to evaluate the expression of MIP-1α (A), CSF3 (B), LTA (C), NFKBIA (D), TLR2 (E), GAPDH (F), ACTB (G) genes. (H) HeLa cells (5 × 106) were transfected with p3xFLAG-Tat, or empty vector (10 µg) and 48 h later ChIP was performed with anti-p65 antibody. Real-time PCR was performed with primers specific for the indicated promoters. (I) HeLa cells (5 × 106) were transfected with empty vector, or p3xFLAG-Tat (10 µg) in presence or absence of siRNA p65, or siRNA control (200 pmol); 48 h later, ChIP was performed with anti-FLAG antibody. Real-time PCR was performed with primers specific for the indicated promoters. (J) HeLa cells (5 × 106) were transfected with empty vector, p3xFLAG-Tat (10 µg), or empty vector plus siRNA IκB-α or siRNA control (200 pmol); 48 h later, ChIP was performed with anti-IκB-α antibody. Real-time PCR was performed with primers specific for the indicated promoters. Values (mean ± SE, n = 3) are shown. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared to the control (empty vector) according to the Student's t-test (P < 0.05). MIP-1α, which was the mostly activated gene by Tat, encodes for a chemokine that promotes the recruitment of pro-inflammatory cells (56). Consistently with our findings, MIP-1α expression was increased in glial cells and lymph nodes of AIDS patients (57,58); moreover, MIP-1α production was induced by HIV-1 infection (59,60) and Tat protein (57,61,62). The transcriptional regulation of MIP-1α has been poorly characterized. Jaspar-based analysis (http://jaspar.genereg.net/) predicted three putative NF-κB enhancers in the proximal promoter region of the MIP-1α gene: NF-κB1, −1023/−1014 nucleotides; NF-κB2, −661/−652 nucleotides; NF-κB3, +370/+379 nucleotides (Supplementary Figure S3A). To validate the predicted NF-κB binding sites of the MIP-1α promoter, we stimulated HeLa cells with TNF-α, a well-known NF-κB inducer, and measured the expression levels of MIP-1α by real-time PCR, and the p65 occupancy of the NF-κB sites by ChIP. TNF-α activated the expression of MIP-1α and induced the p65 recruitment to the NF-κB1 site of MIP-1α without affecting the occupancy of the putative NF-κB2 and NF-κB3 sites (Supplementary Figure S3B and S3C). Tat also promoted the recruitment of p65 to the NF-κB1 site of MIP-1α, while it did not affect the putative NF-κB2 and NF-κB3 sites (Supplementary Figure S3D). Altogether these results indicated that the NF-κB1 site was the only effective NF-κB enhancer of the MIP-1α promoter in response to TNF-α and Tat. Similarly to MIP-1α, Tat increased the recruitment of p65 to the NF-κB enhancers of CSF3, LTA, NFKBIA and TLR2, while it was ineffective at the promoters of GAPDH and ACTB (Figure 5H). By ChIP, Tat bound to the NF-κB-responsive promoters, and not to the GAPDH and ACTB promoters, with loss of binding following p65 RNA interference (Figure 5I), suggesting that Tat occupancy occurred via p65 interaction. As additional findings, IκB-α was chromatin-immunoprecipitated at the NF-κB enhancers in absence of Tat, and it was significantly removed in presence of Tat, or following IκB-α RNA interference (Figure 5J), indicating that Tat displaced IκB-α from promoters. In HIV-1-infected monocytes Tat sustains the NF-κB activity and promotes the transcriptional activation of MIP-1α by interacting with IκB-α and p65 We next analysed whether Tat affected the NF-κB activity and the expression of MIP-1α in the course of HIV-1 infection. To detect the Tat protein, we produced HXB2 Env-pseudotyped NL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R−E− virions, which were used in single-round infection of U937, a human monocytic cell line. Cells were transfected with siRNA Tat, siRNA control or left untransfected to modulate the Tat expression, and then analysed for the kinetic of NF-κB activation following viral infection. The expression of Tat and p24 was detected at 3- to 12-h post-infection, while it was barely detected in siRNA Tat-transfected cells (Figure 6A). Figure 6. In HIV-1 infection Tat sustains the NF-κB activity and enhances the MIP-1α expression via interaction with IκB-α and p65. U937 cells (5 × 107) were transfected with siRNA Tat, siRNA control (2 nmol), or left untransfected; 24 h later cells were infected with HXB2-pseudotyped NL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R−E− virions (500 ng of p24) and harvested at the indicated time. (A) Real-time PCR of total RNA measured the Tat expression; ELISA measured the amount of p24 in whole cell extracts. (B) The binding of p65 to the NF-κB double-stranded oligonucleotide was measured in nuclear extracts (10 µg) using the NF-κB Transcription Factor ELISA assay kit (Cayman). (C) The IκB-α content was analysed by 12% SDS–PAGE and western blotting of cytosolic extracts (20 µg) using anti-IκB-α antibody. Densitometry values (D) of the bands were expressed as fold increase above the control (mock). (D) IKK activity was measured in cytosolic cell extracts (100 µg) using HTScan IKK Kinase Assay (Cell Signaling Technology). (E) U937 cells (5 × 107) were infected with HXB2-pseudotyped NL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R−E− virions, or left uninfected. Twenty-four-hour post-infection, cell extracts (1 mg) were immunoprecipitated with protein G-Sepharose-coupled anti-FLAG antibody. Immunocomplexes were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and analysed by western blotting with anti-p65, anti-FLAG and anti-IκB-α antibodies. (F) U937 cells (5 × 107) were transfected with siRNA Tat, siRNA p65, siRNA control (2 nmol), or left untransfected; 24 h later, cells were infected with HXB2-pseudotyped NL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R−E− virions, or left uninfected. Twenty-four-hour post-infection, total RNA was analysed for MIP-1α expression by real-time PCR. (G and H) U937 cells (5 × 107) were transfected with siRNA Tat or siRNA control (2 nmol), or left untransfected; 24 h later, cells were infected with HXB2-pseudotyped NL4-3.FLAG-Tat.R−E− virions, or left uninfected. Twenty-four-hour post-infection, ChIP was performed with anti-p65 (G) or anti-FLAG (H). Real-time PCR was performed with primers specific for MIP-1α and GAPDH promoters. Values (mean ± SE, n = 3) are shown. The asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared to the control (mock), according to the Student's t-test (P < 0.05). The NF-κB activity, as measured by p65 DNA binding, was induced at 3-h post-infection in both Tat-positive (no siRNA and siRNA control) and Tat-negative cells (siRNA Tat), and increased at 12 h only in Tat-positive cells (Figure 6B). Degradation of IκB-α was observed at 3-h post-infection, and was followed by de novo synthesis of IκB-α at 12 h independently of the Tat presence (Figure 6C). Consistently, the IKK activity was induced at 3-h post-infection and turned off at 12 h independently of the Tat presence (Figure 6D). These results agreed with the kinetic of NF-κB activation in single-round HIV-1 infection of Jurkat cells (Figure 1), and further supported the requirement of viral expression to counteract the post-activation turn off of NF-κB. In HIV-1-infected U937 cells, the endogenous Tat was coimmunoprecipitated with IκB-α and p65 (Figure 6E), and activated the MIP-1α expression in a p65-dependent manner, as shown by the lack of effect following RNA interference of Tat or p65 (Figure 6F). Moreover, Tat and p65 were both recruited to the NF-κB enhancer of MIP-1α, while the p65 occupancy was abolished by siRNA Tat (Figure 6G and H). Altogether these results indicated that in single round HIV-1 infection Tat associated with IκB-α and p65, and induced the p65-dependent activation of MIP-1α expression through occupancy of the MIP-1α promoter and increased recruitment of p65. DISCUSSION This study reports a novel mechanism of NF-κB activation by the HIV-1 Tat transactivator. Based on the evidence that Tat enhanced the transcriptional activity of the p65 subunit of NF-κB (49,63,64), and physically interacted with the IκB-α repressor (50,51), we investigated the possibility that Tat could activate NF-κB via direct interaction with IκB-α and p65. To this end, the NF-κB activity was monitored in single round HIV-1 infection using RNA interference to silence the Tat expression. By this approach, we avoided the perpetuation of NF-κB activation signaling due to subsequent rounds of viral entry in cell culture propagation (30,31). Upon HIV-1 infection, the early NF-κB activation occurred concomitantly with IKK activation and IκB-α degradation in the absence of Tat. Soon after the shut off of IKK activity and new synthesis of IκB-α, the NF-κB activity was kept elevated in the presence of Tat, while it was down regulated upon silencing of the Tat gene. These findings indicate that in single round HIV-1 infection, Tat enhanced the NF-κB activity without affecting the IKK activity and the half-life of IκB-α. Similar kinetic of NF-κB activation occurred upon short-pulse of PMA in Tat-transfected HeLa cells, where Tat inhibited the post-activation turn off of NF-κB in presence of newly synthesized IκB-α. The Tat-dependent activation of NF-κB correlated with the association of the viral protein with IκB-α, which interfered with the generation of the IκB-α/p65 complex. This evidence demonstrated that Tat competed for the binding of IκB-α to p65 and prevented the IκB-α repression of p65. As additional mechanism of NF-κB activation, Tat associated with p65 and increased the p65 binding affinity to the NF-κB enhancer; this evidence was obtained with recombinant proteins indicating that the stronger binding of p65 to DNA was a consequence of direct association with Tat, which likely caused a conformational change of p65. We also demonstrated that the Tat cysteine-rich sequence (C22,25,27) was involved in the binding to the RHD of p65 and NF-κB activation. Differently, the Tat arginine-rich sequence (R49,52,53,55,56,57) was required for the binding to the sixth ankyrin of IκB-α (50,51), and for releasing p65 from the IκB-α inhibition. Altogether these results demonstrated that Tat abolished the negative feedback regulation of NF-κB by hijacking the IκB-α repressor, shielding p65 from the IκB-α embrace, and enforcing the p65 binding to DNA. Further evidence of Tat activation of NF-κB showed that wild-type Tat, and not the Tat mutants lacking the arginine- or cysteine-rich domains, up-regulated in vivo the expression of a number of NF-κB-responsive genes, including MIP-1α, CSF3, LTA, NFKBIA and TLR2. By ChIP analysis, we observed that Tat increased the recruitment of p65 to the NF-κB enhancers of the activated genes, and was recovered at the same sites. RNA interference of p65 abolished the Tat occupancy of the NF-κB enhancers indicating that the Tat binding to the NF-κB sites was mediated by p65. These results were consistent with the evidence that Tat displaced p65 from the binding to IκB-α (Figures 2D and 3C), and increased the p65 DNA binding affinity through association (Figure 4E and F). Thus, Tat likely increased the recruitment of p65 to the NF-κB-dependent promoters by associating with p65 and by interfering with the assembly of p65 with the repressor IκB-α. Of interest, IκB-α was found associated to the NF-κB enhancers in absence of Tat, where it was displaced in presence of Tat. These results suggest a negative regulatory role of IκB-α in gene regulation through occupancy of specific promoters. Indeed, IκB-α was found associated with hystone deacetylases at the hes1 promoter, from where it was removed following TNF-α stimulation causing histone acetylation and hes1 transcriptional activation (65). A similar mechanism of gene regulation could apply to the NF-κB-dependent genes analysed in this study, where Tat could activate the gene expression by removing IκB-α and promoting the p65 loading (Figure 7). Figure 7. Model of MIP-1α transcriptional activation by HIV-1 Tat. (A) In absence of Tat, IκB-α occupies the NF-κB enhancer of the MIP-1α promoter and likely interacts with transcriptional repressors, such as HDACs (65), to inhibit gene transcription. (B) Tat activates the MIP-1α expression by removing the IκB-α repressor from the NF-κB enhancer, and by increasing the binding of p65 NF-κB complex to the NF-κB enhancer. The physiological relevance of Tat cross talk with NF-κB was demonstrated in the HIV-1 infection of human monocytes, where HIV-1-encoded Tat protein counteracted post-activation turn off of NF-κB, as shown by: (i) sustained NF-κB activity by Tat in presence of newly synthesized IκB-α; (ii) coimmunoprecipitation of Tat with IκB-α and p65; (iii) induction of MIP-1α expression dependent on Tat and p65; (iv) Tat occupancy of the MIP-1α NF-κB enhancer associated with increased recruitment of p65. This study supports the pro-inflammatory action of Tat through physical interaction with p65 and IκB-α. Several inflammatory cytokines under the transcriptional control of NF-κB are hyper-expressed in HIV-1 infected individuals, including IL-6 (66,67), TNF-α (68), and MIP-1α (57–62,69–71). In the case of TNF-α and IL-6, Tat activated the cytokine expression by binding to the TAR-like stem loop of the 5′ transcript, thus likely promoting the transcriptional elongation (33,37,47). Here, we have shown that the Tat-dependent transcriptional activation of a number of pro-inflammatory genes required the assembly of Tat with p65 at the NF-κB enhancer together with the displacement of IκB-α (Figure 5). Thus, in the set of distinct NF-κB-responsive genes, Tat acted as a component of the transcriptional initiation complex, which is consistent with previous reports on Tat promoting the transcription via DNA motifs (72,73). Overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines is considered a major mechanism of immune deregulation (26) and neuron dysfunction in AIDS (74,75). In this scenario, inhibition of NF-κB activity could lead to a therapeutic strategy for counteracting the abnormal production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in HIV-1 infection. NF-κB inhibitors, such as anti-oxidants, proteasome and IKK inhibitors, significantly reduced the HIV-1 replication and the associated inflammatory response (76,77); however, these NF-κB inhibitors acted indiscriminately in both HIV-1-infected and uninfected cells. The evidence that Tat activates NF-κB through direct interaction with IκB-α and p65 may lead to specific inhibitors to counteract the Tat pro-inflammatory action. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online: Supplementary Figures 1–3 and Supplementary Materials and Methods. FUNDING Istituto Superiore di Sanità-National Research Program on AIDS (Grant number 40C.77 to I.Q.); Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Grant number FIRB RBLA033WJX_006 to I.Q.); EUROPRISE (Grant number LSHP-CT-2006-037611 to G.S.); FIRC fellowship (to A.R.). Funding for open access charge: EUROPRISE (grant number LSHP-CT-2006-037611). Conflict of interest statement. None declared. Supplementary Material Supplementary Data