PMC:7247521 / 20009-20168
Annnotations
LitCovid-PD-CLO
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T124 | 155-157 | http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001387 | denotes | 4C |
LitCovid-PD-CHEBI
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue | chebi_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T98 | 9-11 | Chemical | denotes | TF | http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_74862 |
| T99 | 61-63 | Chemical | denotes | TF | http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_74862 |
| T100 | 131-136 | Chemical | denotes | group | http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433 |
LitCovid-PD-GO-BP
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T64 | 9-11 | http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0000981 | denotes | TF |
| T65 | 61-63 | http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0000981 | denotes | TF |
LitCovid-sentences
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T112 | 0-159 | Sentence | denotes | Finally, TF analysis showed that LXR was the highest linking TF to bind the four formulae targets and formulae WLS was the highest group to bind TFs (Fig. 4C). |