PMC:7247521 / 20009-20168 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T124","span":{"begin":155,"end":157},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001387"}],"text":"Finally, TF analysis showed that LXR was the highest linking TF to bind the four formulae targets and formulae WLS was the highest group to bind TFs (Fig. 4C)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T98","span":{"begin":9,"end":11},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T99","span":{"begin":61,"end":63},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T100","span":{"begin":131,"end":136},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A98","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T98","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_74862"},{"id":"A99","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T99","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_74862"},{"id":"A100","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T100","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_24433"}],"text":"Finally, TF analysis showed that LXR was the highest linking TF to bind the four formulae targets and formulae WLS was the highest group to bind TFs (Fig. 4C)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T64","span":{"begin":9,"end":11},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0000981"},{"id":"T65","span":{"begin":61,"end":63},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0000981"}],"text":"Finally, TF analysis showed that LXR was the highest linking TF to bind the four formulae targets and formulae WLS was the highest group to bind TFs (Fig. 4C)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T112","span":{"begin":0,"end":159},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Finally, TF analysis showed that LXR was the highest linking TF to bind the four formulae targets and formulae WLS was the highest group to bind TFs (Fig. 4C)."}