PMC:6736480 / 14963-15970 JSONTXT

{"target":"https://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/6736480","sourcedb":"PMC","sourceid":"6736480","source_url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/6736480","text":"When the good response group was defined as ypT0 (Fig. 3A), the values of AUC showed significant differences between the 3 modalities (P \u003c .001). Endoscopy showed significantly higher AUC (0.818) than did mrTRG and combination modality in differentiating good response from poor response (P \u003c .001). Among the 3 modalities, endoscopy showed the highest value and mrTRG showed the lowest value. When the good response group was defined as ypT0-1 (Fig. 3B), the 3 modalities showed no significant differences in differentiating good tumor response from poor response (P = .117). However, the AUC (0.717) of the combination modality was significantly higher than that of mrTRG (P = .011). When the good response group was defined as ypT0-2 (Fig. 3C), the 3 modalities showed significant differences in differentiating good tumor response from poor response (P = .011). The AUC (0.697) of the combination modality was the highest among the methods, and it was significantly higher than that of mrTRG (P = .026).","tracks":[]}