| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| T1 |
0-124 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Effects of Neighboring DNA homopolymers on the biochemical and physical properties of the Escherichia coli lactose promoter. |
| T1 |
0-124 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Effects of Neighboring DNA homopolymers on the biochemical and physical properties of the Escherichia coli lactose promoter. |
| T2 |
125-128 |
Sentence |
denotes |
II. |
| T2 |
125-128 |
Sentence |
denotes |
II. |
| T3 |
129-161 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In vitro transcription analyses. |
| T3 |
129-161 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In vitro transcription analyses. |
| T4 |
162-359 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Transcription studies were conducted on the primary promoter (which initiates at +1) of lac wild type (wt) and UV5 that had insertions of poly(dA).poly(dT) or poly(dG).poly(dC) in their -60 region. |
| T4 |
162-359 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Transcription studies were conducted on the primary promoter (which initiates at +1) of lac wild type (wt) and UV5 that had insertions of poly(dA).poly(dT) or poly(dG).poly(dC) in their -60 region. |
| T5 |
360-489 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This series of recombinant DNAs was designed to study systematically the effect of neighboring DNA sequences on the lac promoter. |
| T5 |
360-489 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This series of recombinant DNAs was designed to study systematically the effect of neighboring DNA sequences on the lac promoter. |
| T6 |
490-664 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Investigations using linear templates showed that wild type expression was enhanced by the poly(dA).poly(dT) insertion, whereas UV5 activity was not affected by this polymer. |
| T6 |
490-664 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Investigations using linear templates showed that wild type expression was enhanced by the poly(dA).poly(dT) insertion, whereas UV5 activity was not affected by this polymer. |
| T7 |
665-753 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Neither the wt nor the UV5 promoter was influenced by the presence of poly(dG).poly(dC). |
| T7 |
665-753 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Neither the wt nor the UV5 promoter was influenced by the presence of poly(dG).poly(dC). |
| T8 |
754-891 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Quantitation of abortive transcripts from supercoiled templates showed that the influence of the polymers on promoter activity was small. |
| T8 |
754-891 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Quantitation of abortive transcripts from supercoiled templates showed that the influence of the polymers on promoter activity was small. |
| T9 |
892-1032 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Comparative studies of the primary promoter with a secondary promoter (which initiates near -22), activated by 25% glycerol, were performed. |
| T9 |
892-1032 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Comparative studies of the primary promoter with a secondary promoter (which initiates near -22), activated by 25% glycerol, were performed. |