| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| TextSentencer_T1 |
0-117 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF. |
| T1 |
0-117 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF. |
| TextSentencer_T2 |
118-375 |
Sentence |
denotes |
A comparative study on the three quantitative methods frequently used in proteomics, 2D DIGE (difference gel electrophoresis), cICAT (cleavable isotope-coded affinity tags) and iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification), was carried out. |
| T2 |
118-375 |
Sentence |
denotes |
A comparative study on the three quantitative methods frequently used in proteomics, 2D DIGE (difference gel electrophoresis), cICAT (cleavable isotope-coded affinity tags) and iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification), was carried out. |
| TextSentencer_T3 |
376-555 |
Sentence |
denotes |
DIGE and cICAT are familiar techniques used in gel- and LC-based quantitative proteomics, respectively. iTRAQ is a new LC-based technique which is gradually gaining in popularity. |
| T3 |
376-555 |
Sentence |
denotes |
DIGE and cICAT are familiar techniques used in gel- and LC-based quantitative proteomics, respectively. iTRAQ is a new LC-based technique which is gradually gaining in popularity. |
| TextSentencer_T4 |
556-635 |
Sentence |
denotes |
A systematic comparison among these quantitative methods has not been reported. |
| T4 |
556-635 |
Sentence |
denotes |
A systematic comparison among these quantitative methods has not been reported. |
| TextSentencer_T5 |
636-863 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In this study, we conducted well-designed comparisons using a six-protein mixture, a reconstituted protein mixture (BSA spiked into human plasma devoid of six abundant proteins), and complex HCT-116 cell lysates as the samples. |
| T5 |
636-863 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In this study, we conducted well-designed comparisons using a six-protein mixture, a reconstituted protein mixture (BSA spiked into human plasma devoid of six abundant proteins), and complex HCT-116 cell lysates as the samples. |
| TextSentencer_T6 |
864-1006 |
Sentence |
denotes |
All three techniques yielded quantitative results with reasonable accuracy when the six-protein or the reconstituted protein mixture was used. |
| T6 |
864-1006 |
Sentence |
denotes |
All three techniques yielded quantitative results with reasonable accuracy when the six-protein or the reconstituted protein mixture was used. |
| TextSentencer_T7 |
1007-1120 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In DIGE, accurate quantification was sometimes compromised due to comigration or partial comigration of proteins. |
| T7 |
1007-1120 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In DIGE, accurate quantification was sometimes compromised due to comigration or partial comigration of proteins. |
| TextSentencer_T8 |
1121-1256 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The iTRAQ method is more susceptible to errors in precursor ion isolation, which could be manifested with increasing sample complexity. |
| T8 |
1121-1256 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The iTRAQ method is more susceptible to errors in precursor ion isolation, which could be manifested with increasing sample complexity. |
| TextSentencer_T9 |
1257-1369 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The quantification sensitivity of each method was estimated by the number of peptides detected for each protein. |
| T9 |
1257-1369 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The quantification sensitivity of each method was estimated by the number of peptides detected for each protein. |
| TextSentencer_T10 |
1370-1563 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In this regard, the global-tagging iTRAQ technique was more sensitive than the cysteine-specific cICAT method, which in turn was as sensitive as, if not more sensitive than, the DIGE technique. |
| T10 |
1370-1563 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In this regard, the global-tagging iTRAQ technique was more sensitive than the cysteine-specific cICAT method, which in turn was as sensitive as, if not more sensitive than, the DIGE technique. |
| TextSentencer_T11 |
1564-1757 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Protein profiling on HCT-116 and HCT-116 p53 -/- cell lysates displayed limited overlapping among proteins identified by the three methods, suggesting the complementary nature of these methods. |
| T11 |
1564-1757 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Protein profiling on HCT-116 and HCT-116 p53 -/- cell lysates displayed limited overlapping among proteins identified by the three methods, suggesting the complementary nature of these methods. |