| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| TextSentencer_T1 |
0-147 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The type and yield of lipopolysaccharide from symbiotically deficient rhizobium lipopolysaccharide mutants vary depending on the extraction method. |
| T1 |
0-147 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The type and yield of lipopolysaccharide from symbiotically deficient rhizobium lipopolysaccharide mutants vary depending on the extraction method. |
| T1 |
0-147 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The type and yield of lipopolysaccharide from symbiotically deficient rhizobium lipopolysaccharide mutants vary depending on the extraction method. |
| TextSentencer_T2 |
148-266 |
Sentence |
denotes |
At least 18 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extraction methods are available, and no single method is universally applicable. |
| T2 |
148-266 |
Sentence |
denotes |
At least 18 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extraction methods are available, and no single method is universally applicable. |
| T2 |
148-266 |
Sentence |
denotes |
At least 18 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extraction methods are available, and no single method is universally applicable. |
| TextSentencer_T3 |
267-482 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Here, the LPSs from four R.etli, one R.leguminosarum bv. trifolii mutant, 24AR, and the R.etli parent strain, CE3, were isolated by hot phenol/water (phi;/W), and phenol/EDTA/triethylamine (phi/EDTA/TEA) extraction. |
| T3 |
267-482 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Here, the LPSs from four R.etli, one R.leguminosarum bv. trifolii mutant, 24AR, and the R.etli parent strain, CE3, were isolated by hot phenol/water (phi;/W), and phenol/EDTA/triethylamine (phi/EDTA/TEA) extraction. |
| T3 |
267-482 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Here, the LPSs from four R.etli, one R.leguminosarum bv. trifolii mutant, 24AR, and the R.etli parent strain, CE3, were isolated by hot phenol/water (phi;/W), and phenol/EDTA/triethylamine (phi/EDTA/TEA) extraction. |
| TextSentencer_T4 |
483-625 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS in various preparations was quantified, analyzed by deoxycholate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (DOC-PAGE), and by immunoblotting. |
| T4 |
483-625 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS in various preparations was quantified, analyzed by deoxycholate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (DOC-PAGE), and by immunoblotting. |
| T4 |
483-625 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS in various preparations was quantified, analyzed by deoxycholate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (DOC-PAGE), and by immunoblotting. |
| TextSentencer_T5 |
626-742 |
Sentence |
denotes |
These rhizobia normally have two prominent LPS forms: LPS I, which has O-polysaccharide, and LPS II, which has none. |
| T5 |
626-742 |
Sentence |
denotes |
These rhizobia normally have two prominent LPS forms: LPS I, which has O-polysaccharide, and LPS II, which has none. |
| T5 |
626-742 |
Sentence |
denotes |
These rhizobia normally have two prominent LPS forms: LPS I, which has O-polysaccharide, and LPS II, which has none. |
| TextSentencer_T6 |
743-852 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS forms obtained depend on the method of extraction and vary depending on the mutant that is extracted. |
| T6 |
743-852 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS forms obtained depend on the method of extraction and vary depending on the mutant that is extracted. |
| T6 |
743-852 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS forms obtained depend on the method of extraction and vary depending on the mutant that is extracted. |
| TextSentencer_T7 |
853-900 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Both methods extract LPS I and LPS II from CE3. |
| T7 |
853-900 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Both methods extract LPS I and LPS II from CE3. |
| T7 |
853-900 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Both methods extract LPS I and LPS II from CE3. |
| TextSentencer_T8 |
901-989 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The phi/EDTA/TEA, but not the phi/W, method extracts LPS I from mutants CE358 and CE359. |
| T8 |
901-989 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The phi/EDTA/TEA, but not the phi/W, method extracts LPS I from mutants CE358 and CE359. |
| T8 |
901-989 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The phi/EDTA/TEA, but not the phi/W, method extracts LPS I from mutants CE358 and CE359. |
| TextSentencer_T9 |
990-1247 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Conversely, the phi;/W but not the phi;/EDTA/TEA method extracts CE359 LPS V, an LPS form with a truncated O-polysaccharide. phi/EDTA/TEA extraction of mutant CE406 gives good yields of LPS I and II, while phi/W extraction gives very small amounts of LPS I. |
| T9 |
990-1247 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Conversely, the phi;/W but not the phi;/EDTA/TEA method extracts CE359 LPS V, an LPS form with a truncated O-polysaccharide. phi/EDTA/TEA extraction of mutant CE406 gives good yields of LPS I and II, while phi/W extraction gives very small amounts of LPS I. |
| T9 |
990-1426 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Conversely, the phi;/W but not the phi;/EDTA/TEA method extracts CE359 LPS V, an LPS form with a truncated O-polysaccharide. phi/EDTA/TEA extraction of mutant CE406 gives good yields of LPS I and II, while phi/W extraction gives very small amounts of LPS I. The LPS yield from all the strains using phi/EDTA/TEA extraction is fairly consistent (3-fold range), while the yields from phi/W extraction are highly variable (850-fold range). |
| TextSentencer_T10 |
1248-1426 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS yield from all the strains using phi/EDTA/TEA extraction is fairly consistent (3-fold range), while the yields from phi/W extraction are highly variable (850-fold range). |
| T10 |
1248-1426 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The LPS yield from all the strains using phi/EDTA/TEA extraction is fairly consistent (3-fold range), while the yields from phi/W extraction are highly variable (850-fold range). |
| TextSentencer_T11 |
1427-1599 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The phi/EDTA/TEA method extracts LPS I and LPS II from mutant 24AR, but the phi/W method partitions LPS II exclusively into the phenol phase, making its recovery difficult. |
| T10 |
1427-1599 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The phi/EDTA/TEA method extracts LPS I and LPS II from mutant 24AR, but the phi/W method partitions LPS II exclusively into the phenol phase, making its recovery difficult. |
| T11 |
1427-1599 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The phi/EDTA/TEA method extracts LPS I and LPS II from mutant 24AR, but the phi/W method partitions LPS II exclusively into the phenol phase, making its recovery difficult. |
| TextSentencer_T12 |
1600-1758 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Overall, phi/EDTA/TEA extraction yields more forms of LPS from the mutants and provides a simpler, faster, and less hazardous alternative to phi/W extraction. |
| T11 |
1600-1758 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Overall, phi/EDTA/TEA extraction yields more forms of LPS from the mutants and provides a simpler, faster, and less hazardous alternative to phi/W extraction. |
| T12 |
1600-1758 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Overall, phi/EDTA/TEA extraction yields more forms of LPS from the mutants and provides a simpler, faster, and less hazardous alternative to phi/W extraction. |
| TextSentencer_T13 |
1759-1881 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Nevertheless, it is concluded that careful analysis of any LPS mutant requires the use of more than one extraction method. |
| T12 |
1759-1881 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Nevertheless, it is concluded that careful analysis of any LPS mutant requires the use of more than one extraction method. |
| T13 |
1759-1881 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Nevertheless, it is concluded that careful analysis of any LPS mutant requires the use of more than one extraction method. |