PMC:1382200 / 14208-15784 JSONTXT 4 Projects

Annnotations TAB TSV DIC JSON TextAE

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T7006 4-14 NN denotes genotyping
T7008 15-22 VBZ denotes results
T7009 23-26 IN denotes for
T7010 27-36 NNS denotes weanlings
T7011 36-38 , denotes ,
T7012 38-55 JJ denotes post-implantation
T7014 55-57 , denotes ,
T7015 57-60 CC denotes and
T7016 61-77 JJ denotes pre-implantation
T7013 78-85 NNS denotes embryos
T7017 86-89 VBP denotes are
T7007 90-95 VBN denotes shown
T7018 96-98 IN denotes in
T7019 99-104 NN denotes Table
T7020 105-106 CD denotes 2
T7021 106-107 . denotes .
T7022 107-260 sentence denotes Curiously, the ratio of Capn2+/+ to Capn2+/-animals from inbred heterozygous intercrosses was substantially less than the predicted 1:2 Mendelian ratio.
T7023 108-117 RB denotes Curiously
T7025 117-119 , denotes ,
T7026 119-122 DT denotes the
T7027 123-128 NN denotes ratio
T7028 129-131 IN denotes of
T7029 132-137 NN denotes Capn2
T7030 137-138 SYM denotes +
T7031 138-139 HYPH denotes /
T7032 139-140 SYM denotes +
T7033 141-143 IN denotes to
T7034 144-149 NN denotes Capn2
T7036 149-150 SYM denotes +
T7037 150-151 HYPH denotes /
T7038 151-152 SYM denotes -
T7035 152-159 NNS denotes animals
T7039 160-164 IN denotes from
T7040 165-171 JJ denotes inbred
T7042 172-184 JJ denotes heterozygous
T7041 185-197 NNS denotes intercrosses
T7024 198-201 VBD denotes was
T7043 202-215 RB denotes substantially
T7044 216-220 JJR denotes less
T7045 221-225 IN denotes than
T7046 226-229 DT denotes the
T7048 230-239 VBN denotes predicted
T7049 240-241 CD denotes 1
T7050 241-242 SYM denotes :
T7051 242-243 CD denotes 2
T7052 244-253 JJ denotes Mendelian
T7047 254-259 NN denotes ratio
T7053 259-260 . denotes .
T7054 260-403 sentence denotes In a group of 199 animals derived from heterozygote breeding (33 litters), 23 Capn2+/+ (11.6%) and 176 (88.4%) Capn2+/- animals were observed.
T7055 261-263 IN denotes In
T7057 264-265 DT denotes a
T7058 266-271 NN denotes group
T7059 272-274 IN denotes of
T7060 275-278 CD denotes 199
T7061 279-286 NNS denotes animals
T7062 287-294 VBN denotes derived
T7063 295-299 IN denotes from
T7064 300-312 NN denotes heterozygote
T7065 313-321 NN denotes breeding
T7066 322-323 -LRB- denotes (
T7068 323-325 CD denotes 33
T7067 326-333 NNS denotes litters
T7069 333-334 -RRB- denotes )
T7070 334-336 , denotes ,
T7071 336-338 CD denotes 23
T7072 339-344 NN denotes Capn2
T7073 344-345 SYM denotes +
T7074 345-346 HYPH denotes /
T7075 346-347 SYM denotes +
T7076 348-349 -LRB- denotes (
T7078 349-353 CD denotes 11.6
T7077 353-354 NN denotes %
T7079 354-355 -RRB- denotes )
T7080 356-359 CC denotes and
T7081 360-363 CD denotes 176
T7083 364-365 -LRB- denotes (
T7085 365-369 CD denotes 88.4
T7084 369-370 NN denotes %
T7086 370-371 -RRB- denotes )
T7082 372-377 NN denotes Capn2
T7088 377-378 SYM denotes +
T7089 378-379 HYPH denotes /
T7090 379-380 SYM denotes -
T7087 381-388 NNS denotes animals
T7091 389-393 VBD denotes were
T7056 394-402 VBN denotes observed
T7092 402-403 . denotes .
T7093 403-652 sentence denotes The ratio of Capn2+/+ to Capn2+/- animals among males (14% to 82%) or females (13% to 90%) was essentially the same is it was for the combined population, and there were an average of six pups per litter, which is normal for this background strain.
T7094 404-407 DT denotes The
T7095 408-413 NN denotes ratio
T7097 414-416 IN denotes of
T7098 417-422 NN denotes Capn2
T7099 422-423 SYM denotes +
T7100 423-424 HYPH denotes /
T7101 424-425 SYM denotes +
T7102 426-428 IN denotes to
T7103 429-434 NN denotes Capn2
T7105 434-435 SYM denotes +
T7106 435-436 HYPH denotes /
T7107 436-437 SYM denotes -
T7104 438-445 NNS denotes animals
T7108 446-451 IN denotes among
T7109 452-457 NNS denotes males
T7110 458-459 -LRB- denotes (
T7112 459-461 CD denotes 14
T7111 461-462 NN denotes %
T7113 463-465 IN denotes to
T7114 466-468 CD denotes 82
T7115 468-469 NN denotes %
T7116 469-470 -RRB- denotes )
T7117 471-473 CC denotes or
T7118 474-481 NNS denotes females
T7119 482-483 -LRB- denotes (
T7121 483-485 CD denotes 13
T7120 485-486 NN denotes %
T7122 487-489 IN denotes to
T7123 490-492 CD denotes 90
T7124 492-493 NN denotes %
T7125 493-494 -RRB- denotes )
T7096 495-498 VBD denotes was
T7126 499-510 RB denotes essentially
T7127 511-514 DT denotes the
T7128 515-519 JJ denotes same
T7129 520-522 IN denotes is
T7131 523-525 PRP denotes it
T7130 526-529 VBD denotes was
T7132 530-533 IN denotes for
T7133 534-537 DT denotes the
T7135 538-546 VBN denotes combined
T7134 547-557 NN denotes population
T7136 557-559 , denotes ,
T7137 559-562 CC denotes and
T7138 563-568 EX denotes there
T7139 569-573 VBD denotes were
T7140 574-576 DT denotes an
T7141 577-584 NN denotes average
T7142 585-587 IN denotes of
T7143 588-591 CD denotes six
T7144 592-596 NNS denotes pups
T7145 597-600 IN denotes per
T7146 601-607 NN denotes litter
T7147 607-609 , denotes ,
T7148 609-614 WDT denotes which
T7149 615-617 VBZ denotes is
T7150 618-624 JJ denotes normal
T7151 625-628 IN denotes for
T7152 629-633 DT denotes this
T7154 634-644 NN denotes background
T7153 645-651 NN denotes strain
T7155 651-652 . denotes .
T7156 652-786 sentence denotes A larger than expected proportion Capn2+/- animals was also evident in both post-implantation and pre-implantation embryos (Table 2).
T7157 653-654 DT denotes A
T7159 655-661 JJR denotes larger
T7160 662-666 IN denotes than
T7161 667-675 VBN denotes expected
T7158 676-686 NN denotes proportion
T7163 687-692 NN denotes Capn2
T7165 692-693 SYM denotes +
T7166 693-694 HYPH denotes /
T7167 694-695 SYM denotes -
T7164 696-703 NNS denotes animals
T7162 704-707 VBD denotes was
T7168 708-712 RB denotes also
T7169 713-720 JJ denotes evident
T7170 721-723 IN denotes in
T7171 724-728 CC denotes both
T7173 729-746 JJ denotes post-implantation
T7174 747-750 CC denotes and
T7175 751-767 JJ denotes pre-implantation
T7172 768-775 NNS denotes embryos
T7176 776-777 -LRB- denotes (
T7177 777-782 NN denotes Table
T7178 783-784 CD denotes 2
T7179 784-785 -RRB- denotes )
T7180 785-786 . denotes .
T7181 786-964 sentence denotes Interestingly, a similar over-representation of heterozygous animals was also reported in one of the Capn4 transgenic lines, though the genotype skewing was not as extreme [32].
T7182 787-800 RB denotes Interestingly
T7184 800-802 , denotes ,
T7185 802-803 DT denotes a
T7187 804-811 JJ denotes similar
T7186 812-831 NN denotes over-representation
T7188 832-834 IN denotes of
T7189 835-847 JJ denotes heterozygous
T7190 848-855 NNS denotes animals
T7191 856-859 VBD denotes was
T7192 860-864 RB denotes also
T7183 865-873 VBN denotes reported
T7193 874-876 IN denotes in
T7194 877-880 CD denotes one
T7195 881-883 IN denotes of
T7196 884-887 DT denotes the
T7198 888-893 NN denotes Capn4
T7199 894-904 JJ denotes transgenic
T7197 905-910 NNS denotes lines
T7200 910-912 , denotes ,
T7201 912-918 IN denotes though
T7203 919-922 DT denotes the
T7205 923-931 NN denotes genotype
T7204 932-939 NN denotes skewing
T7202 940-943 VBD denotes was
T7206 944-947 RB denotes not
T7207 948-950 IN denotes as
T7208 951-958 JJ denotes extreme
T7209 959-960 -LRB- denotes [
T7210 960-962 CD denotes 32
T7211 962-963 -RRB- denotes ]
T7212 963-964 . denotes .
T7213 964-1093 sentence denotes Crosses between Capn2+/+ and Capn2+/- animals also resulted in a greater than expected proportion of Capn2+/- animals (Table 2).
T7214 965-972 NNS denotes Crosses
T7216 973-980 IN denotes between
T7217 981-986 NN denotes Capn2
T7219 986-987 SYM denotes +
T7220 987-988 HYPH denotes /
T7221 988-989 SYM denotes +
T7222 990-993 CC denotes and
T7223 994-999 NN denotes Capn2
T7224 999-1000 SYM denotes +
T7225 1000-1001 HYPH denotes /
T7226 1001-1002 SYM denotes -
T7218 1003-1010 NNS denotes animals
T7227 1011-1015 RB denotes also
T7215 1016-1024 VBD denotes resulted
T7228 1025-1027 IN denotes in
T7229 1028-1029 DT denotes a
T7231 1030-1037 JJR denotes greater
T7232 1038-1042 IN denotes than
T7233 1043-1051 VBN denotes expected
T7230 1052-1062 NN denotes proportion
T7234 1063-1065 IN denotes of
T7235 1066-1071 NN denotes Capn2
T7237 1071-1072 SYM denotes +
T7238 1072-1073 HYPH denotes /
T7239 1073-1074 SYM denotes -
T7236 1075-1082 NNS denotes animals
T7240 1083-1084 -LRB- denotes (
T7241 1084-1089 NN denotes Table
T7242 1090-1091 CD denotes 2
T7243 1091-1092 -RRB- denotes )
T7244 1092-1093 . denotes .
T7245 1093-1249 sentence denotes An even higher degree of Capn2+/- over-representation was seen when the mutant allele came the mother (73%) compared to when it came from the father (59%).
T7246 1094-1096 DT denotes An
T7248 1097-1101 RB denotes even
T7249 1102-1108 JJR denotes higher
T7247 1109-1115 NN denotes degree
T7251 1116-1118 IN denotes of
T7252 1119-1124 NN denotes Capn2
T7254 1124-1125 SYM denotes +
T7255 1125-1126 HYPH denotes /
T7256 1126-1127 SYM denotes -
T7253 1128-1147 NN denotes over-representation
T7257 1148-1151 VBD denotes was
T7250 1152-1156 VBN denotes seen
T7258 1157-1161 WRB denotes when
T7260 1162-1165 DT denotes the
T7262 1166-1172 NN denotes mutant
T7261 1173-1179 NN denotes allele
T7259 1180-1184 VBD denotes came
T7263 1185-1188 DT denotes the
T7264 1189-1195 NN denotes mother
T7265 1196-1197 -LRB- denotes (
T7267 1197-1199 CD denotes 73
T7266 1199-1200 NN denotes %
T7268 1200-1201 -RRB- denotes )
T7269 1202-1210 VBN denotes compared
T7270 1211-1213 IN denotes to
T7271 1214-1218 WRB denotes when
T7273 1219-1221 PRP denotes it
T7272 1222-1226 VBD denotes came
T7274 1227-1231 IN denotes from
T7275 1232-1235 DT denotes the
T7276 1236-1242 NN denotes father
T7277 1243-1244 -LRB- denotes (
T7279 1244-1246 CD denotes 59
T7278 1246-1247 NN denotes %
T7280 1247-1248 -RRB- denotes )
T7281 1248-1249 . denotes .
T7282 1249-1576 sentence denotes In these crosses the ratios of Capn2+/+ to Capn2+/- animals among males or females compared well with the ratio in the combined populations; 77% of males and 69% of females were Capn2+/- when the mutant allele came from the mother, and 62% of males and 55% of females were Capn2+/- when the mutant allele came from the father.
T7283 1250-1252 IN denotes In
T7285 1253-1258 DT denotes these
T7286 1259-1266 NNS denotes crosses
T7287 1267-1270 DT denotes the
T7288 1271-1277 NNS denotes ratios
T7289 1278-1280 IN denotes of
T7290 1281-1286 NN denotes Capn2
T7291 1286-1287 SYM denotes +
T7292 1287-1288 HYPH denotes /
T7293 1288-1289 SYM denotes +
T7294 1290-1292 IN denotes to
T7295 1293-1298 NN denotes Capn2
T7297 1298-1299 SYM denotes +
T7298 1299-1300 HYPH denotes /
T7299 1300-1301 SYM denotes -
T7296 1302-1309 NNS denotes animals
T7300 1310-1315 IN denotes among
T7301 1316-1321 NNS denotes males
T7302 1322-1324 CC denotes or
T7303 1325-1332 NNS denotes females
T7284 1333-1341 VBN denotes compared
T7304 1342-1346 RB denotes well
T7305 1347-1351 IN denotes with
T7306 1352-1355 DT denotes the
T7307 1356-1361 NN denotes ratio
T7308 1362-1364 IN denotes in
T7309 1365-1368 DT denotes the
T7311 1369-1377 VBN denotes combined
T7310 1378-1389 NNS denotes populations
T7312 1389-1390 : denotes ;
T7313 1391-1393 CD denotes 77
T7314 1393-1394 NN denotes %
T7316 1395-1397 IN denotes of
T7317 1398-1403 NNS denotes males
T7318 1404-1407 CC denotes and
T7319 1408-1410 CD denotes 69
T7320 1410-1411 NN denotes %
T7321 1412-1414 IN denotes of
T7322 1415-1422 NNS denotes females
T7315 1423-1427 VBD denotes were
T7323 1428-1433 NN denotes Capn2
T7324 1433-1434 SYM denotes +
T7325 1434-1435 HYPH denotes /
T7326 1435-1436 SYM denotes -
T7327 1437-1441 WRB denotes when
T7329 1442-1445 DT denotes the
T7331 1446-1452 NN denotes mutant
T7330 1453-1459 NN denotes allele
T7328 1460-1464 VBD denotes came
T7332 1465-1469 IN denotes from
T7333 1470-1473 DT denotes the
T7334 1474-1480 NN denotes mother
T7335 1480-1482 , denotes ,
T7336 1482-1485 CC denotes and
T7337 1486-1488 CD denotes 62
T7338 1488-1489 NN denotes %
T7340 1490-1492 IN denotes of
T7341 1493-1498 NNS denotes males
T7342 1499-1502 CC denotes and
T7343 1503-1505 CD denotes 55
T7344 1505-1506 NN denotes %
T7345 1507-1509 IN denotes of
T7346 1510-1517 NNS denotes females
T7339 1518-1522 VBD denotes were
T7347 1523-1528 NN denotes Capn2
T7348 1528-1529 SYM denotes +
T7349 1529-1530 HYPH denotes /
T7350 1530-1531 SYM denotes -
T7351 1532-1536 WRB denotes when
T7353 1537-1540 DT denotes the
T7355 1541-1547 NN denotes mutant
T7354 1548-1554 NN denotes allele
T7352 1555-1559 VBD denotes came
T7356 1560-1564 IN denotes from
T7357 1565-1568 DT denotes the
T7358 1569-1575 NN denotes father
T7359 1575-1576 . denotes .
R1882 T7006 T7007 nsubjpass genotyping,shown
R1883 T7008 T7006 nmod results,genotyping
R1884 T7009 T7006 prep for,genotyping
R1885 T7010 T7009 pobj weanlings,for
R1886 T7011 T7010 punct ", ",weanlings
R1887 T7012 T7013 nmod post-implantation,embryos
R1888 T7013 T7010 appos embryos,weanlings
R1889 T7014 T7012 punct ", ",post-implantation
R1890 T7015 T7012 cc and,post-implantation
R1891 T7016 T7012 conj pre-implantation,post-implantation
R1892 T7017 T7007 auxpass are,shown
R1893 T7018 T7007 prep in,shown
R1894 T7019 T7018 pobj Table,in
R1895 T7020 T7019 nummod 2,Table
R1896 T7021 T7007 punct .,shown
R1897 T7023 T7024 advmod Curiously,was
R1898 T7025 T7024 punct ", ",was
R1899 T7026 T7027 det the,ratio
R1900 T7027 T7024 nsubj ratio,was
R1901 T7028 T7027 prep of,ratio
R1902 T7029 T7028 pobj Capn2,of
R1903 T7030 T7029 punct +,Capn2
R1904 T7031 T7029 punct /,Capn2
R1905 T7032 T7029 punct +,Capn2
R1906 T7033 T7027 prep to,ratio
R1907 T7034 T7035 nmod Capn2,animals
R1908 T7035 T7033 pobj animals,to
R1909 T7036 T7034 punct +,Capn2
R1910 T7037 T7034 punct /,Capn2
R1911 T7038 T7034 punct -,Capn2
R1912 T7039 T7027 prep from,ratio
R1913 T7040 T7041 amod inbred,intercrosses
R1914 T7041 T7039 pobj intercrosses,from
R1915 T7042 T7041 amod heterozygous,intercrosses
R1916 T7043 T7044 advmod substantially,less
R1917 T7044 T7024 acomp less,was
R1918 T7045 T7044 prep than,less
R1919 T7046 T7047 det the,ratio
R1920 T7047 T7045 pobj ratio,than
R1921 T7048 T7047 amod predicted,ratio
R1922 T7049 T7047 nummod 1,ratio
R1923 T7050 T7051 punct :,2
R1924 T7051 T7049 prep 2,1
R1925 T7052 T7047 amod Mendelian,ratio
R1926 T7053 T7024 punct .,was
R1927 T7055 T7056 prep In,observed
R1928 T7057 T7058 det a,group
R1929 T7058 T7055 pobj group,In
R1930 T7059 T7058 prep of,group
R1931 T7060 T7061 nummod 199,animals
R1932 T7061 T7059 pobj animals,of
R1933 T7062 T7061 acl derived,animals
R1934 T7063 T7062 prep from,derived
R1935 T7064 T7065 compound heterozygote,breeding
R1936 T7065 T7063 pobj breeding,from
R1937 T7066 T7067 punct (,litters
R1938 T7067 T7065 parataxis litters,breeding
R1939 T7068 T7067 nummod 33,litters
R1940 T7069 T7067 punct ),litters
R1941 T7070 T7056 punct ", ",observed
R1942 T7071 T7072 nummod 23,Capn2
R1943 T7072 T7056 nsubjpass Capn2,observed
R1944 T7073 T7072 punct +,Capn2
R1945 T7074 T7072 punct /,Capn2
R1946 T7075 T7072 punct +,Capn2
R1947 T7076 T7077 punct (,%
R1948 T7077 T7072 parataxis %,Capn2
R1949 T7078 T7077 nummod 11.6,%
R1950 T7079 T7077 punct ),%
R1951 T7080 T7072 cc and,Capn2
R1952 T7081 T7082 nummod 176,Capn2
R1953 T7082 T7087 nmod Capn2,animals
R1954 T7083 T7084 punct (,%
R1955 T7084 T7082 parataxis %,Capn2
R1956 T7085 T7084 nummod 88.4,%
R1957 T7086 T7084 punct ),%
R1958 T7087 T7072 conj animals,Capn2
R1959 T7088 T7082 punct +,Capn2
R1960 T7089 T7082 punct /,Capn2
R1961 T7090 T7082 punct -,Capn2
R1962 T7091 T7056 auxpass were,observed
R1963 T7092 T7056 punct .,observed
R1964 T7094 T7095 det The,ratio
R1965 T7095 T7096 nsubj ratio,was
R1966 T7097 T7095 prep of,ratio
R1967 T7098 T7097 pobj Capn2,of
R1968 T7099 T7098 punct +,Capn2
R1969 T7100 T7098 punct /,Capn2
R1970 T7101 T7098 punct +,Capn2
R1971 T7102 T7095 prep to,ratio
R1972 T7103 T7104 nmod Capn2,animals
R1973 T7104 T7102 pobj animals,to
R1974 T7105 T7103 punct +,Capn2
R1975 T7106 T7103 punct /,Capn2
R1976 T7107 T7103 punct -,Capn2
R1977 T7108 T7095 prep among,ratio
R1978 T7109 T7108 pobj males,among
R1979 T7110 T7111 punct (,%
R1980 T7111 T7109 parataxis %,males
R1981 T7112 T7111 nummod 14,%
R1982 T7113 T7111 prep to,%
R1983 T7114 T7115 nummod 82,%
R1984 T7115 T7113 pobj %,to
R1985 T7116 T7111 punct ),%
R1986 T7117 T7109 cc or,males
R1987 T7118 T7109 conj females,males
R1988 T7202 T7183 advcl was,reported
R1989 T7119 T7120 punct (,%
R1990 T7203 T7204 det the,skewing
R1991 T7120 T7118 parataxis %,females
R1992 T7204 T7202 nsubj skewing,was
R1993 T7121 T7120 nummod 13,%
R1994 T7205 T7204 compound genotype,skewing
R1995 T7206 T7202 neg not,was
R1996 T7207 T7202 prep as,was
R1997 T7122 T7120 prep to,%
R1998 T7208 T7207 amod extreme,as
R1999 T7209 T7210 punct [,32
R2000 T7123 T7124 nummod 90,%
R2001 T7210 T7202 parataxis 32,was
R2002 T7211 T7210 punct ],32
R2003 T7212 T7183 punct .,reported
R2004 T7124 T7122 pobj %,to
R2005 T7214 T7215 nsubj Crosses,resulted
R2006 T7125 T7120 punct ),%
R2007 T7216 T7214 prep between,Crosses
R2008 T7217 T7218 nmod Capn2,animals
R2009 T7218 T7216 pobj animals,between
R2010 T7219 T7217 punct +,Capn2
R2011 T7220 T7217 punct /,Capn2
R2012 T7126 T7096 advmod essentially,was
R2013 T7221 T7217 punct +,Capn2
R2014 T7222 T7217 cc and,Capn2
R2015 T7223 T7217 conj Capn2,Capn2
R2016 T7224 T7223 punct +,Capn2
R2017 T7127 T7128 advmod the,same
R2018 T7128 T7096 acomp same,was
R2019 T7129 T7130 mark is,was
R2020 T7225 T7223 punct /,Capn2
R2021 T7130 T7128 advcl was,same
R2022 T7226 T7223 punct -,Capn2
R2023 T7227 T7215 advmod also,resulted
R2024 T7228 T7215 prep in,resulted
R2025 T7131 T7130 nsubj it,was
R2026 T7229 T7230 det a,proportion
R2027 T7230 T7228 pobj proportion,in
R2028 T7132 T7130 prep for,was
R2029 T7231 T7230 amod greater,proportion
R2030 T7232 T7233 mark than,expected
R2031 T7233 T7231 advcl expected,greater
R2032 T7133 T7134 det the,population
R2033 T7234 T7230 prep of,proportion
R2034 T7235 T7236 nmod Capn2,animals
R2035 T7134 T7132 pobj population,for
R2036 T7236 T7234 pobj animals,of
R2037 T7237 T7235 punct +,Capn2
R2038 T7238 T7235 punct /,Capn2
R2039 T7135 T7134 amod combined,population
R2040 T7239 T7235 punct -,Capn2
R2041 T7240 T7241 punct (,Table
R2042 T7241 T7215 parataxis Table,resulted
R2043 T7136 T7096 punct ", ",was
R2044 T7242 T7241 nummod 2,Table
R2045 T7243 T7241 punct ),Table
R2046 T7244 T7215 punct .,resulted
R2047 T7137 T7096 cc and,was
R2048 T7246 T7247 det An,degree
R2049 T7247 T7250 nsubjpass degree,seen
R2050 T7138 T7139 expl there,were
R2051 T7248 T7249 advmod even,higher
R2052 T7249 T7247 amod higher,degree
R2053 T7139 T7096 conj were,was
R2054 T7251 T7247 prep of,degree
R2055 T7252 T7253 nmod Capn2,over-representation
R2056 T7140 T7141 det an,average
R2057 T7253 T7251 pobj over-representation,of
R2058 T7254 T7252 punct +,Capn2
R2059 T7255 T7252 punct /,Capn2
R2060 T7141 T7139 attr average,were
R2061 T7256 T7252 punct -,Capn2
R2062 T7257 T7250 auxpass was,seen
R2063 T7258 T7259 advmod when,came
R2064 T7259 T7250 advcl came,seen
R2065 T7260 T7261 det the,allele
R2066 T7261 T7259 nsubj allele,came
R2067 T7142 T7141 prep of,average
R2068 T7262 T7261 compound mutant,allele
R2069 T7263 T7264 det the,mother
R2070 T7264 T7259 dobj mother,came
R2071 T7143 T7144 nummod six,pups
R2072 T7265 T7266 punct (,%
R2073 T7266 T7259 parataxis %,came
R2074 T7144 T7142 pobj pups,of
R2075 T7267 T7266 nummod 73,%
R2076 T7268 T7266 punct ),%
R2077 T7269 T7250 prep compared,seen
R2078 T7145 T7144 prep per,pups
R2079 T7270 T7269 prep to,compared
R2080 T7271 T7272 advmod when,came
R2081 T7146 T7145 pobj litter,per
R2082 T7272 T7270 pcomp came,to
R2083 T7273 T7272 nsubj it,came
R2084 T7147 T7141 punct ", ",average
R2085 T7148 T7149 dep which,is
R2086 T7274 T7272 prep from,came
R2087 T7149 T7141 relcl is,average
R2088 T7275 T7276 det the,father
R2089 T7276 T7274 pobj father,from
R2090 T7150 T7149 acomp normal,is
R2091 T7277 T7278 punct (,%
R2092 T7278 T7272 parataxis %,came
R2093 T7279 T7278 nummod 59,%
R2094 T7151 T7149 prep for,is
R2095 T7280 T7278 punct ),%
R2096 T7281 T7250 punct .,seen
R2097 T7152 T7153 det this,strain
R2098 T7283 T7284 prep In,compared
R2099 T7153 T7151 pobj strain,for
R2100 T7285 T7286 det these,crosses
R2101 T7286 T7283 pobj crosses,In
R2102 T7154 T7153 compound background,strain
R2103 T7287 T7288 det the,ratios
R2104 T7288 T7284 nsubj ratios,compared
R2105 T7289 T7288 prep of,ratios
R2106 T7155 T7139 punct .,were
R2107 T7290 T7289 pobj Capn2,of
R2108 T7291 T7290 punct +,Capn2
R2109 T7157 T7158 det A,proportion
R2110 T7292 T7290 punct /,Capn2
R2111 T7293 T7290 punct +,Capn2
R2112 T7294 T7288 prep to,ratios
R2113 T7295 T7296 nmod Capn2,animals
R2114 T7296 T7294 pobj animals,to
R2115 T7297 T7295 punct +,Capn2
R2116 T7298 T7295 punct /,Capn2
R2117 T7158 T7162 nsubj proportion,was
R2118 T7299 T7295 punct -,Capn2
R2119 T7300 T7288 prep among,ratios
R2120 T7301 T7300 pobj males,among
R2121 T7159 T7158 amod larger,proportion
R2122 T7302 T7301 cc or,males
R2123 T7303 T7301 conj females,males
R2124 T7304 T7284 advmod well,compared
R2125 T7160 T7161 mark than,expected
R2126 T7305 T7284 prep with,compared
R2127 T7306 T7307 det the,ratio
R2128 T7161 T7159 advcl expected,larger
R2129 T7163 T7164 nmod Capn2,animals
R2130 T7164 T7158 npadvmod animals,proportion
R2131 T7307 T7305 pobj ratio,with
R2132 T7165 T7163 punct +,Capn2
R2133 T7308 T7284 prep in,compared
R2134 T7309 T7310 det the,populations
R2135 T7310 T7308 pobj populations,in
R2136 T7166 T7163 punct /,Capn2
R2137 T7311 T7310 amod combined,populations
R2138 T7312 T7284 punct ;,compared
R2139 T7167 T7163 punct -,Capn2
R2140 T7313 T7314 nummod 77,%
R2141 T7314 T7315 nsubj %,were
R2142 T7315 T7284 conj were,compared
R2143 T7168 T7162 advmod also,was
R2144 T7316 T7314 prep of,%
R2145 T7317 T7316 pobj males,of
R2146 T7318 T7314 cc and,%
R2147 T7169 T7162 acomp evident,was
R2148 T7319 T7320 nummod 69,%
R2149 T7320 T7314 conj %,%
R2150 T7170 T7162 prep in,was
R2151 T7321 T7320 prep of,%
R2152 T7322 T7321 pobj females,of
R2153 T7323 T7315 attr Capn2,were
R2154 T7171 T7172 preconj both,embryos
R2155 T7324 T7323 punct +,Capn2
R2156 T7325 T7323 punct /,Capn2
R2157 T7326 T7323 punct -,Capn2
R2158 T7172 T7170 pobj embryos,in
R2159 T7327 T7328 advmod when,came
R2160 T7328 T7315 advcl came,were
R2161 T7329 T7330 det the,allele
R2162 T7173 T7172 nmod post-implantation,embryos
R2163 T7330 T7328 nsubj allele,came
R2164 T7331 T7330 compound mutant,allele
R2165 T7332 T7328 prep from,came
R2166 T7333 T7334 det the,mother
R2167 T7334 T7332 pobj mother,from
R2168 T7335 T7315 punct ", ",were
R2169 T7174 T7173 cc and,post-implantation
R2170 T7336 T7315 cc and,were
R2171 T7337 T7338 nummod 62,%
R2172 T7338 T7339 nsubj %,were
R2173 T7175 T7173 conj pre-implantation,post-implantation
R2174 T7339 T7315 conj were,were
R2175 T7340 T7338 prep of,%
R2176 T7341 T7340 pobj males,of
R2177 T7176 T7177 punct (,Table
R2178 T7342 T7338 cc and,%
R2179 T7343 T7344 nummod 55,%
R2180 T7344 T7338 conj %,%
R2181 T7177 T7162 parataxis Table,was
R2182 T7345 T7344 prep of,%
R2183 T7346 T7345 pobj females,of
R2184 T7347 T7339 attr Capn2,were
R2185 T7178 T7177 nummod 2,Table
R2186 T7348 T7347 punct +,Capn2
R2187 T7349 T7347 punct /,Capn2
R2188 T7350 T7347 punct -,Capn2
R2189 T7179 T7177 punct ),Table
R2190 T7351 T7352 advmod when,came
R2191 T7352 T7339 advcl came,were
R2192 T7180 T7162 punct .,was
R2193 T7353 T7354 det the,allele
R2194 T7354 T7352 nsubj allele,came
R2195 T7355 T7354 compound mutant,allele
R2196 T7182 T7183 advmod Interestingly,reported
R2197 T7356 T7352 prep from,came
R2198 T7184 T7183 punct ", ",reported
R2199 T7357 T7358 det the,father
R2200 T7358 T7356 pobj father,from
R2201 T7185 T7186 det a,over-representation
R2202 T7359 T7339 punct .,were
R2203 T7186 T7183 nsubjpass over-representation,reported
R2204 T7187 T7186 amod similar,over-representation
R2205 T7188 T7186 prep of,over-representation
R2206 T7189 T7190 amod heterozygous,animals
R2207 T7190 T7188 pobj animals,of
R2208 T7191 T7183 auxpass was,reported
R2209 T7192 T7183 advmod also,reported
R2210 T7193 T7183 prep in,reported
R2211 T7194 T7193 pobj one,in
R2212 T7195 T7194 prep of,one
R2213 T7196 T7197 det the,lines
R2214 T7197 T7195 pobj lines,of
R2215 T7198 T7197 nmod Capn4,lines
R2216 T7199 T7197 amod transgenic,lines
R2217 T7200 T7183 punct ", ",reported
R2218 T7201 T7202 mark though,was