LitCovid-sentences  

PubMed:32676739 JSONTXT 13 Projects

Annnotations TAB TSV DIC JSON TextAE

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T1 0-82 Sentence denotes The wave of "opinion articles" in the coverage of COVID-19 in surgical literature.
T2 83-96 Sentence denotes INTRODUCTION:
T3 97-201 Sentence denotes The COVID-19 pandemic is having a deep impact on our surgical practice and scientific publishing output.
T4 202-210 Sentence denotes METHODS:
T5 211-264 Sentence denotes The 100 best-ranked "surgery journals" were selected.
T6 265-367 Sentence denotes The contents of the March, April, May, and June 2020 issues and ahead-of-print articles were screened.
T7 368-567 Sentence denotes The retrieved articles on COVID-19 were separated into two categories: "opinion articles" and "scientific articles," i.e., randomized trials and original articles with structured methods and results.
T8 568-691 Sentence denotes The number of COVID articles published in the TOP-10 journals was compared with that of COVID articles published elsewhere.
T9 692-700 Sentence denotes RESULTS:
T10 701-744 Sentence denotes There were 59 COVID original articles (8%).
T11 745-806 Sentence denotes The great majority of articles were opinion articles (83.4%).
T12 807-874 Sentence denotes Almost 40% of COVID articles were published in the TOP-10 journals.
T13 875-886 Sentence denotes CONCLUSION:
T14 887-949 Sentence denotes Original COVID articles (the core of our knowledge) are scant.
T15 950-1060 Sentence denotes Faced with a novel disease, neither the authors nor the editors should be criticized regarding this situation.
T16 1061-1158 Sentence denotes The future step should be to publish high-quality papers in the setting of a major health crisis.