PMC:7738161 / 17903-18950 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB TSV DIC JSON TextAE

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T131 0-105 Sentence denotes We found that, as of April 11, 2020, physical distancing had considerably reduced the contact rate in BC.
T132 106-356 Sentence denotes We estimated that individuals practising physical distancing experienced approximately 0.22 (0.11–0.34 90% CI [credible interval]) of their normal contact rate, which was below the critical threshold (0.55; Fig 3; Figures E–H and Table C in S1 Text).
T133 357-525 Sentence denotes The model described the count data well, with reported cases showing a peak in late March, approximately two weeks after the initiation of distancing measures (Fig 3A).
T134 526-678 Sentence denotes The data were informative with respect to both main parameters with the posteriors distinctly different and more peaked than the priors (Fig 3B and 3D).
T135 679-804 Sentence denotes We used a fixed value of e, the fraction engaged in distancing; this choice was motivated by the survey and behavioural data.
T136 805-907 Sentence denotes If e were lower, the estimated strength of distancing would be higher to achieve the same case counts.
T137 908-1047 Sentence denotes We found this trade-off analytically using the basic reproduction number for the full model (Supplemental Methods and Figure A in S1 Text).