| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| T131 |
176-375 |
Sentence |
denotes |
RT-qPCR–positive samples with a CT < 30 scored positive in the RT-LAMP assay (79 of 81), whereas almost all samples with CT values between 30 and 40 scored negative (only 4 positive of 36) (Fig. 3B). |
| T132 |
376-498 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This confirmed the sensitivity of the RT-LAMP assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in samples corresponding to a CT < 30. |
| T133 |
499-657 |
Sentence |
denotes |
We observed small differences between different plates on the exact sensitivity threshold, probably caused by slight variability in plate or reagent handling. |
| T134 |
658-821 |
Sentence |
denotes |
We found two RT-qPCR–negative samples that scored positive in the RT-LAMP assay (Fig. 3A and Table 1) and one sample that scored just below the ΔOD cutoff of +0.3. |
| T135 |
822-910 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The overall specificity of the RT-LAMP test was 99.7% (Wilson’s 95% confidence interval: |
| T136 |
911-1027 |
Sentence |
denotes |
98.9 to 99.9%), and the sensitivity for samples with CT < 30 on RT-qPCR was 97.5% (Wilson’s 95% confidence interval: |
| T137 |
1028-1066 |
Sentence |
denotes |
91.4 to 99.3%) (Fig. 3B and table S2). |
