Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
T58 |
0-170 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The final question to consider is how many more deaths would have resulted if the US had opted for a more limited lockdown that was much less hazardous to the US economy. |
T59 |
171-421 |
Sentence |
denotes |
It is clear that anticontagion policies significantly slow the growth of COVID‐19, but what policies and how much slowing are optimal? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586‐020‐2405‐7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586‐020‐2404‐8_reference.pdf. |
T60 |
422-549 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The best example of what might have happened is found in Sweden, and that country is an imperfect surrogate for the US economy. |
T61 |
550-644 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Sweden now has one of the highest COVID death rates in the world—almost 44 per 100,000 people. |
T62 |
645-699 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The number of U.S. deaths per 100,000 is just over 32. |
T63 |
700-851 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In Denmark, this number is 10, and in Norway, less than 5. https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/06/08/sweden‐backtracks‐on‐its‐low‐pain‐coronavirus‐plan/. |
T64 |
852-944 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Sweden’s plan is now considered to be less than optimal, but what if the US had followed it? |
T65 |
945-1015 |
Sentence |
denotes |
How many additional net deaths would we have suffered due to COVID‐19? |
T66 |
1016-1146 |
Sentence |
denotes |
How many fewer deaths would we have suffered from postponing health interventions, suicide, and domestic violence, and alcoholism? |
T67 |
1147-1224 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Let us assume 100,000 additional deaths for the sake of a simple calculation. |
T68 |
1225-1337 |
Sentence |
denotes |
To save these 100,000 individuals, the cost to the economy was $9 trillion, or $90 million per statistical life. |
T69 |
1338-1500 |
Sentence |
denotes |
And keep in mind a large component of these individuals could have an economic life valuation much less than the $10 million standard value of a statistical life. |