Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
T50 |
0-2 |
Sentence |
denotes |
2. |
T51 |
3-10 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Methods |
T52 |
12-16 |
Sentence |
denotes |
2.1. |
T53 |
17-63 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Systematic Review Protocol and Search Strategy |
T54 |
64-248 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The guidelines and the procedures as detailed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [50] were followed for drafting this systematic review. |
T55 |
249-434 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Original research articles reporting influenza virus types IAV, IBV, ICV, and IDV in swine populations until February 21, 2020 were searched through PubMed and Google Scholar databases. |
T56 |
435-670 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The influenza virus sequence information was also verified using “Influenza Virus Resource” of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/FLU/) and “Influenza Research Database” (https://www.fludb.org/brc/home.spg?decorator=influenza). |
T57 |
671-807 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The sequence information helped in the identification of additional relevant articles reported from Indonesia, Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka. |
T58 |
808-1207 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The search terms including “Influenza outbreak in swine” OR “Influenza A virus in swine” OR “Influenza B virus in swine” OR “Influenza C virus in swine” OR “Influenza D virus in swine” OR “Influenza virus in pigs” were entered one by one in PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify all full-text research publications or case reports which reported influenza virus types or subtypes in swine. |
T59 |
1208-1504 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The outcome suggesting research publications reporting influenza virus types and subtypes in swine along with the transmission of influenza viruses between human and swine, birds and swine, poultry and swine, cattle and swine as well as horse and swine were thoroughly investigated for inclusion. |
T60 |
1505-1652 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The search results suggesting influenza virus prevalence and/or transmission in or between species other than swine were omitted from the analysis. |
T61 |
1653-1778 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Occasionally, the full-text articles were also requested from the authors, if the full-text article was not available online. |
T62 |
1779-1855 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Two publications which could not be accessed were omitted from the analysis. |
T63 |
1856-1953 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Search results yielding articles in a language other than English were omitted from the analysis. |
T64 |
1954-2187 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The articles were first screened through their abstracts to find out their relevance for inclusion, and, if required, the introduction and/or results and discussion sections were also screened to assess their relevance for inclusion. |
T65 |
2188-2332 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The relevant articles were downloaded and stored on the computer drive for further screening and refinement according to PRISMA guidelines [50]. |
T66 |
2333-2520 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The references of downloaded publications were also screened to identify relevant articles reporting the influenza viruses in swine, which were also downloaded to include in the analysis. |
T67 |
2521-2599 |
Sentence |
denotes |
An overview of the methodology can be observed in the PRISMA chart (Figure 2). |
T68 |
2601-2605 |
Sentence |
denotes |
2.2. |
T69 |
2606-2638 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria |
T70 |
2639-2714 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The following criteria were applied for screening of the eligible articles: |
T71 |
2715-2878 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The original research articles and case reports which documented the influenza viruses in swine in natural settings across the world were included in the analysis. |
T72 |
2879-2975 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The experimental studies which did not report the natural cases were excluded from the analysis. |
T73 |
2976-3114 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The reviews, letters, editorials, conference proceedings, and articles in a language other than English were not included in the analysis. |
T74 |
3115-3171 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Duplicate articles were also excluded from the analysis. |
T75 |
3172-3275 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The eligible articles (n = 281) thus selected were included in the analysis for this systematic review. |
T76 |
3277-3281 |
Sentence |
denotes |
2.3. |
T77 |
3282-3299 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Ethical Approvals |
T78 |
3300-3399 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This systematic review did not involve animal sampling or experimental protocols in the laboratory. |
T79 |
3400-3498 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The data used for writing this article were obtained from the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. |
T80 |
3499-3741 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This systematic review is part of a research project which has already obtained the relevant ethical approvals from the Animal Research Ethics Committee (AREC), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; AREC Reference: AREC/041/019D. |
T81 |
3742-3876 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Additionally, the authors have the required permission to do research in terms of Section 20 of the Animal Diseases Act, 1984 (Act No. |
T82 |
3877-4015 |
Sentence |
denotes |
35 of 1984) from the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), Government of the Republic of South Africa; DAFF Reference: |
T83 |
4016-4035 |
Sentence |
denotes |
12/11/1/5/4 (1425). |