| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| T150 |
0-59 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Types of relationship between regional traffic and COVID-19 |
| T151 |
60-250 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In Table 3 the analyses in Table 2, Figure 4, and Figure 5 have been classified into types for each region, based on whether the trends in traffic and COVID-19 were increasing or decreasing. |
| T152 |
251-382 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Incheon was categorized as a region requiring strong control (Type 1), with increasing trends for both COVID-19 spread and traffic. |
| T153 |
383-587 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Gyeonggi and Seoul were categorized as regions in the early stages of focused control or requiring control (Type 2), with increasing traffic but a relatively stable trend for new confirmed COVID-19 cases. |
| T154 |
588-709 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The other regions were categorized as stable (Type 3), with increasing traffic but decreasing trends for COVID-19 spread. |
| T155 |
710-789 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Table 3 The level of relationship between traffic and COVID-19 in cities, 2020. |
| T156 |
790-817 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Trend in 2020 Specific City |
| T157 |
818-840 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Level Traffic COVID-19 |
| T158 |
841-887 |
Sentence |
denotes |
1 + + (Danger) Strong control required Incheon |
| T159 |
888-976 |
Sentence |
denotes |
2 0 (Caution) Control required, or in the early stage of focused control Gyeonggi, Seoul |
| T160 |
977-1116 |
Sentence |
denotes |
3 − (Stable) Under stable control Daegu, Busan, Gwangju, Daejeon, Ulsan, Sejong, Chungbuk, Chungnam, Jeonbuk, Jeonnam, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongnam |
| T161 |
1117-1158 |
Sentence |
denotes |
+ = increasing; 0 = same; − = decreasing. |
