| Id |
Subject |
Object |
Predicate |
Lexical cue |
| T137 |
0-50 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Effects of quarantine rates at different scenarios |
| T138 |
51-181 |
Sentence |
denotes |
In this section, the effects of quarantine rates at six scenarios on the COVID-19 variations are displayed in Figure 5, Figure 6 . |
| T139 |
182-463 |
Sentence |
denotes |
For the first time point t 1 = 10, Feb 6, 2020, Sce 1 (q 1, q 2) = (0q 1 * , 0q 2 *) has significantly negative impacts on the COVID-19 variations with the disease outbreak again which suggest the very high risks appear at the quarantine strategy of Sce 1 (Figure 5, Figure 6A). |
| T140 |
464-628 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Specifically, the confirmed cases reaches its first peak value as the baseline result at Feb 10, 2020, and then the number is decreased close to 97 at Mar 14, 2020. |
| T141 |
629-755 |
Sentence |
denotes |
A sharp increase is detected to the second peak value of the confirmed cases with the number of 1016704 at 165 days (Fig. 6A). |
| T142 |
756-872 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The disease will become extinction after 361 days with the MVCCC dramatically reaching to more than 9 million (Figs. |
| T143 |
873-890 |
Sentence |
denotes |
5A and STable 2). |
| T144 |
891-1154 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Sce 2: (q 1, q 2) = (0q 1 * , 0.5q 2 *) and Sce 3: (q 1, q 2) = (0q 1 * , q 2 *) have the similar impacts on the disease variations with the largest cumulative confirmed values of 1444 at 110 days (i.e. May 15, 2020), and 1416 at 105 days (i.e. May 10, 2020). |
| T145 |
1155-1358 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The DDE and MVCCC of Sce 4: (q 1, q 2) = (0.5q 1 * , 0.5q 2 *), Sce 5: (q 1, q 2) = (0.5q 1 * , q 2 *) and Sce 6: (q 1, q 2) = (q 1 * , 0.5q 2 *) are agreement with the baseline results (STable 2). |
| T146 |
1359-1494 |
Sentence |
denotes |
These three scenarios have very weak influences on the confirmed case variations compared with the baseline result (Fig. 6A, STable 2). |
| T147 |
1495-1743 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Figure 5 Scenarios results of quarantine rates impacting on the cumuletive confirmed COVID-19 cases at four time points: (A) t1 = 10, (B) t1 = 20, (C) t1 = 28 and (D) t1 = 38 corresponding to Feb 6, 2020, Feb 16, 2020, Feb 24, 2020 and Mar 5, 2020. |
| T148 |
1744-1981 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Figure 6 Scenarios results of quarantine rates impacting on the confirmed COVID-19 cases at four time points: (A) t1 = 10, (B) t1 = 20, (C) t1 = 28 and (D) t1 = 38 corresponding to Feb 6, 2020, Feb 16, 2020, Feb 24, 2020 and Mar 5, 2020. |
| T149 |
1982-2243 |
Sentence |
denotes |
For the other three time points, Sce 1: (q 1, q 2) = (0q 1 * , 0q 2 *) increased the MVCCC and prolonged the DDE with the values of 1430 at 123 days (i.e. May 28, 2020), 1416 at 115 days (i.e. May 20, 2020) and 1409 at 112 days (i.e. May 17, 2020) (STable 2). |
| T150 |
2244-2402 |
Sentence |
denotes |
The disease variations of the other scenarios are agreement with the baseline results which indicates the weak impacts of these scenarios (Fig. 5A, STable 2). |
| T151 |
2403-2695 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Moreover, we also explored that the second outbreak of the disease appears when both the values of q 1 and q 2 are nearly close to zero, such as (q 1, q 2) = (0.01q 1 * , 0.01q 2 *), (0q 1 * , 0.05q 2 *) at t 1 = 10, and (q 1, q 2) = (0q 1 * , 0q 2 *) at t 1 = 11 (Fig. 7 , STable 3). |
| T152 |
2696-2905 |
Sentence |
denotes |
This suggests that no quarantine or very weak quarantine on the susceptible individuals and exposed individuals before the days of the peak values of the confirmed cases may lead to the disease outbreak again. |
| T153 |
2906-3178 |
Sentence |
denotes |
Figure 7 Cumulative confirmed COVID-19 cases (A) and confirmed COVID-19 cases (B) at the scenarios of aspect 2 with (q1, q2) = (0.01q1 * , 0.01q2 *), (0q1 * , 0.05q2 *) at t1 = 10, and (q1, q2) = (0q1 * , 0q2 *) at t1 = 11, and the other parameters as the baseline values. |
