|
article-title
|
COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA)—From Immunology to Treatment
|
|
abstract
|
Like severe influenza, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has emerged as an important disease that predisposes patients to secondary pulmonary aspergillosis, with 35 cases of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) published until June 2020. The release of danger-associated molecular patterns during severe COVID-19 results in both pulmonary epithelial damage and inflammatory disease, which are predisposing risk factors for pulmonary aspergillosis. Moreover, collateral effects of host recognition pathways required for the activation of antiviral immunity may, paradoxically, contribute to a highly permissive inflammatory environment that favors fungal pathogenesis. Diagnosis of CAPA remains challenging, mainly because bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan testing and culture, which represent the most sensitive diagnostic tests for aspergillosis in the ICU, are hindered by the fact that bronchoscopies are rarely performed in COVID-19 patients due to the risk of disease transmission. Similarly, autopsies are rarely performed, which may result in an underestimation of the prevalence of CAPA. Finally, the treatment of CAPA is complicated by drug–drug interactions associated with broad spectrum azoles, renal tropism and damage caused by SARS-CoV-2, which may challenge the use of liposomal amphotericin B, as well as the emergence of azole-resistance. This clinical reality creates an urgency for new antifungal drugs currently in advanced clinical development with more promising pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.
|
|
p
|
Like severe influenza, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has emerged as an important disease that predisposes patients to secondary pulmonary aspergillosis, with 35 cases of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) published until June 2020. The release of danger-associated molecular patterns during severe COVID-19 results in both pulmonary epithelial damage and inflammatory disease, which are predisposing risk factors for pulmonary aspergillosis. Moreover, collateral effects of host recognition pathways required for the activation of antiviral immunity may, paradoxically, contribute to a highly permissive inflammatory environment that favors fungal pathogenesis. Diagnosis of CAPA remains challenging, mainly because bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan testing and culture, which represent the most sensitive diagnostic tests for aspergillosis in the ICU, are hindered by the fact that bronchoscopies are rarely performed in COVID-19 patients due to the risk of disease transmission. Similarly, autopsies are rarely performed, which may result in an underestimation of the prevalence of CAPA. Finally, the treatment of CAPA is complicated by drug–drug interactions associated with broad spectrum azoles, renal tropism and damage caused by SARS-CoV-2, which may challenge the use of liposomal amphotericin B, as well as the emergence of azole-resistance. This clinical reality creates an urgency for new antifungal drugs currently in advanced clinical development with more promising pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.
|
|
body
|
1. Introduction
Invasive fungal infections caused by various fungal genera, including Aspergillus, complicate and endanger lives of millions of individuals annually [1]. Aspergillus genera, most frequently Aspergillus fumigatus, are ubiquitous in the environment and cause a wide range of infections in humans, including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), chronic rhinosinusitis, fungal asthma, and Aspergillus bronchitis [2,3]. IPA, the most severe manifestation of disease from Aspergillus, is associated with high mortality rates and is a prominent complication among those with profound immunosuppression, such as those undergoing hematopoietic transplantation, as well as those with structural lung damage who receive systemic corticosteroids for their underlying condition, such as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) [2].
Recently, it has been reported that a relatively high number of influenza patients presenting with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) also rapidly develop IPA, which is associated with increased duration of hospitalization and mortality [4,5]. Corticosteroid use and pulmonary epithelial damages caused by severe influenza are the main risk factors for developing IPA [4,5]. The recent global pandemic of coronavirus disease-19, also known as COVID-19, has infected over 6 million patients worldwide, with more than 360,000 deaths. It has been shown that up to 40% of COVID-19 hospitalized patients can develop ARDS [6], and thereby become susceptible to acquire co-infections caused by bacteria and also Aspergillus spp. [7,8], although frequency of co-infections seems to vary between centers and overall co-infections may occur less frequently than with severe influenza [9]. Once they occur, these superinfections are associated with high mortality rates and may prolong the acute phase of COVID-19 [10]. In this comprehensive review, we discuss various aspects of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), focusing specifically on immunology, risk factors, prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and current challenges.
2. Immunology
Dissecting the complex pathogenesis of CAPA requires a molecular understanding of the physiological processes whereby infection with SARS-CoV-2 facilitates fungal pathogenesis. Similar to other SARS coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 targets and invades epithelial cells and type II pneumocytes through binding of the SARS spike protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors [11]. Cleavage of the S1/S2 domain by the type 2 transmembrane protease TMPRSS2 leads to the activation of the spike protein [12], thereby facilitating viral entry into the target cell via ACE2. Besides its role as a SARS virus receptor, ACE2 was also demonstrated to be required for protection from severe acute lung injury in ARDS [13]. In support of this, an insertion/deletion polymorphism that affects ACE activity was associated with ARDS susceptibility and outcome [14]. Whether the preceding interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with host cells, by disrupting the regulation of the renin-angiotensin system and or the kallikrein-kinin system, contributes to the development of CAPA, is not known.
Viral entry and infection elicit an immune response, which is initiated by the establishment of an inflammatory cascade by innate immune cells. Although the receptor(s) and signaling pathways involved in the immune recognition of Aspergillus and the downstream production of inflammatory mediators are relatively well characterized [15], not much is known regarding how the immune system senses and responds to SARS-CoV-2. Based on the available knowledge for infections with other coronaviruses, two possible mechanisms can be anticipated and are likely to explain the development of ARDS and consequently CAPA. The first involves the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), signal molecules released by dying or damaged cells that act as endogenous danger signals to promote and exacerbate the immune and inflammatory response leading to lung injury [16]. It is noteworthy that DAMPs have also been shown to regulate inflammation in fungal diseases [17]. The DAMP/receptor for advanced glycation end-products axis was found to integrate with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to generate and amplify the inflammatory response in experimental aspergillosis [18]. Moreover, recipients of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation harboring genetic variants underlying a hyperactivation of danger signaling in response to infection displayed an increased risk of developing IPA [19]. This emerging concept could help explain fungal pathogenesis in conditions of exuberant inflammation such as that observed in COVID-19 patients and highlights DAMP targeting as potential immunomodulatory strategy in CAPA.
A second possibility involves the collateral effects of recognition pathways required for the activation of antiviral immunity that may, paradoxically, contribute to an inflammatory environment that favors secondary infections. ACE2 is not well expressed on immune cells and SARS-CoV are recognized by TLR4 and TLR3, leading to the activation of MyD88- or TRIF-mediated signaling, respectively [20,21]. Of note, this may be potentiated in the presence of Aspergillus spp. which activate TLR4/MyD88/TRIF through the cleavage of fibrinogen [22]. It is likely that SARS-CoV-2 may elicit, to a large extent, overlapping signaling pathways towards the production of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, the activation of the inflammasome by SARS-CoV and the consequent production of IL-1β is an event that contributes further to the hyperinflammatory response [23]. A transcriptome analysis of COVID-19 patients revealed an early immune response characterized by a marked upregulation of the IL-1 pathway, even after respiratory function nadir [24]. The possibility that IL-1 and related pro-inflammatory pathways could serve as therapeutic targets was demonstrated by the favorable responses in severe COVID-19 patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra [25]. Similar findings were also disclosed in acute leukemia patients with COVID-19 [26]. Likewise, IL-1 blockade with anakinra has also been found to ameliorate inflammation in both chronic granulomatous disease [27] and cystic fibrosis [28], and in either case, to restrain susceptibility to infection or colonization by Aspergillus. Therefore, the early hyperactivation of the IL-1 pathway induced by the SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a major factor establishing a highly permissive inflammatory environment that favors fungal pathogenesis.
Besides IL-1, increased levels of IL-6 have also been consistently reported in severe cases of COVID-19 [29,30], with an impact on immune cell function and the anti-viral mechanisms of immune cells [31]. An enhanced production of IL-6 is also observed in epithelial cells following infection with A. fumigatus, suggesting that, at least in some patients, the co-infection may contribute to the increased levels of this cytokine in severe COVID-19 patients [32]. In a large patient series of COVID-19 patients with ARDS, the use of the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab was recently reported to promote rapid and sustained responses associated with significant clinical improvement [33]. However, such clinical approach could paradoxically enhance the predisposition to CAPA, similar to animal models of IL-6 deficiency subjected to experimental aspergillosis [34]. For this reason, ongoing trials are addressing the combined use of IL-6 antagonists and antifungal prophylaxis in severe COVID-19 patients.
An emerging body of evidence supports therefore an increased systemic inflammatory reaction in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection who are more likely to develop CAPA. In this regard, increased levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, were observed in patients requiring intensive care, compared to those with milder infections [35]. Other studies, however, have also unveiled marked defects in immune cell populations, namely T-lymphocytes, as another factor explaining the immune dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 [36]. This suggests that while sustained innate immune function leads to hyperinflammation [37], lymphocyte numbers decline, and their function may be defective. In this regard, severe lymphocytopenia was among the factors in a risk score model that predicted the development of invasive mold disease in patients with hematological malignances [38]. It is thus reasonable to speculate that in elderly individuals or with co-morbidities, defective immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 may allow unrestricted viral replication which, in turn, elicits hyperinflammation and severe complications such as ARDS [39], besides establishing favorable conditions for the acquisition of secondary infections, such as CAPA.
While there is much to be learned about CAPA, our current understanding of the pathophysiology of other coinfections with respiratory viruses such as influenza [40] provides an important framework towards the effective design of immunotherapeutic approaches and the identification of the patients that could benefit the most from them.
3. Risk Factors Implicated in CAPA Development
Importantly, the pathogenesis of IPA differs between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, including those with COVID-19, impacting clinical presentation, radiological findings and diagnostic test results in the mycology laboratory [41,42]. Despite these important differences, revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions [43] focus primarily on neutropenic patients with underlying hematological malignancies and “typical” presentation of IPA and have been shown to have limited applicability and inferior performance in non-neutropenic patients who frequently do not fulfil radiological and host criteria, including patients with COVID-19 [41,44]. This has resulted in the creation of an alternative clinical algorithm for diagnosing IPA in the ICU setting in 2012 [41], which defines putative IPA and is now the standard of care for defining IPA in the ICU [4,45], where highly reliable definitions of IA are still missing (work on improved definitions is currently in progress [45,46]).
Rapid development of CAPA few days following ICU admission [47] resembles the observation made for influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis [4,5]. Risk factors predisposing COVID-19 patients to develop secondary pulmonary aspergillosis are similar to those identified for influenza-IPA superinfections [4,5]. The most important risk factors include severe lung damage during the course of COVID-19 [48], the use of corticosteroids in those with ARDS, the widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in intensive care units [49], and the presence of comorbidities such as structural lung defects [47,50,51,52].
There are some reports revealing that pulmonary fibrosis can be triggered by the cytokine storm activated by the viral antigens, toxicity posed by drugs, high airway pressure and hypoxia-induced acute lung injury secondary to mechanical ventilation [53]. While interstitial pulmonary fibrosis per se does not predispose to development of IPA, a small subset of these COVID-19 survivors may require long term corticosteroid treatment, which may predispose them to CAPA years after the acute phase of the viral infection. Overall, 29% of the CAPA cases published to date (10/35) had received systemic corticosteroids (Table 1). In those with ARDS, systemic corticosteroids are used to alleviate the immune responses and prevent cytokine storm [6,54,55,56], but may at the same time increase vulnerability for developing secondary infections [4,5].
Although detailed case series have not reported on antibiotic use among patients, broad-spectrum antibiotics are presumed to be used in 75% of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU [49]. Since the human gut microbiome is a highly complicated structure of bacteria and fungi, although bacteria are the most diverse constituents, the administration of antibiotics results in perturbation of microbiome steady-state composition, which allows fungi to thrive, and may predispose the host to invasive fungal infections once the immune system becomes impaired [65,66].
Underlying medical conditions may also predispose COVID-19 patients to develop CAPA. Among the 35 CAPA cases published to date (Table 1), hypertension (17/35; 49%), diabetes (9/35; 26%), obesity (8/35; 23%), COPD (5/35; 14%), heart diseases (5/35; 14%), hypercholesterinemia (4/35; 11%), and asthma (3/35; 9%) were among the most prevalent comorbidities observed. While hypertension, coronary heart diseases, and diabetes increase the risk of infection overall [67,68,69], structural lung damage caused by COPD or asthma may particularly predispose patients to develop IPA [70].
4. CAPA Prevalence
Several studies from China reported high rates of Aspergillus infections among COVID-19 patients. In one study from the Jiangsu province in China, 60/257 COVID-19 (23.3%) patients had throat swab samples that tested positive for Aspergillus spp. and were reported as Aspergillus co-infections [8]. In another Chinese study from the Zhejiang province 8 of the 104 patients with COVID-19 (7.7%) patients were reported to have IPA although questions remain regarding criteria used for diagnosing IPA in this study (authors state EORTC/MSG criteria were used but all 8 patients seemingly lacked host factors) [71]. Another study from China reported that 27% of the COVID-19 patients (13/48) developed fungal infections but lacked further details [7]. In other reports from China, lower rates of fungal infections were reported ranging between 3.2–5% [54,55,72]. None of those studies have used specific definitions and standardized diagnostic algorithms to identify and define CAPA. In fact, diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging with culture exhibiting limited sensitivity [73,74], and galactomannan testing—the current gold standard—is rarely available in China [75]. As a result, some of these reported rates are likely an underestimate of the real burden of IPA in patients with COVID-19 requiring ICU admission, while other rates may be an overestimation due to potentially misinterpreting Aspergillus colonization in the upper respiratory tract as Aspergillus infection.
More recently, several studies and case-series from Europe (France, Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands) have reported high rates of CAPA among COVID-19 cases with ARDS, ranging from 20–35% (Table 1) [47,50,51,52]. The development of CAPA was fairly rapid, with a median of 6 days and range of 3–28 days after ICU admission [47,52]. Moreover, two additional CAPA cases have been reported from Germany [61] and single cases have also been reported from the Netherlands [62], Austria [60], Italy [59], Australia [63], and France [57,58] (Table 1). Among 35 CAPA cases reported to date, there were a total of 5 proven cases [52,59]. The overall mortality rate was 63% (22/35), among whom 4 were female (4/8; 50%) and 14 were male (18/27; 67%). The mortality in case series reported from France, Germany, Belgium and Netherlands ranged between 44.5–66.7% [47,50,51,52]. Of particular importance was the 100% fatality rate of those with underlying diseases reported from the Netherlands, while the two patients without underlying conditions both survived [47]. Noteworthy is the fact that COVID-19 patients presented with ARDS typically fall into the elderly category [6], whereas ARDS in those infected with influenza involves both children <5 years old and elderly >65 years old [76]. The difficulties in diagnosing CAPA, which are outlined in more detail in the next section of this review, may also contribute to increased mortality rates. The most notable example is a study from France [57], where both culture and serology assays were negative for the initial respiratory samples and became only positive after the patient expired [57]. In a case from Italy, initial BALF culture was positive for A. fumigatus but the treatment was delayed for two days and only started after the serum galactomannan test became positive [59]. CAPA was later confirmed by autopsy examination [59]. As a result, authors encouraged prompt initiation of systemic antifungal therapy immediately after obtaining positive results even if Aspergillus is detected in samples from the upper respiratory tract [59]. Since azole resistance can be associated with a higher mortality rate when compared to patients infected with azole susceptible A. fumigatus isolates, it is of paramount importance to use antifungal susceptibility testing to inform targeted antifungal treatment, especially in regions with high azole resistance [77]. Azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates were also persistently recovered from tracheal aspirates during the course of azole treatment in the most recent study from the Netherlands implicated a CAPA case for whom [62]. The azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolate (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole MICs were 16, 2, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively) harbored a well-known mutation, TR34/L98H [62], presumed to have been acquired from the environment [77]. The in vitro MIC value of the isolate obtained at day 19 (2 mg/L) was higher than the voriconazole serum trough concentration measured on day 17 (1.43 mg/L) and despite switching voriconazole to l-AmB, the patient died due to deteriorating health conditions [62]. Overall, A. fumigatus appeared to be the most prevalent Aspergillus spp. isolated among respiratory samples with positive culture (26/29; 90%), followed by A. flavus (2/29; 7%).
5. Diagnostic Workup for Accurate Identification of CAPA
The optimal diagnostic algorithm for diagnosing CAPA is currently unknown, and this question is actively being investigated in an ongoing multinational explorative trial in conjunction with the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). The most common methods to date include attempting to recover Aspergillus spp. on culture media of bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) and tracheal aspirate, as well as utilizing serologic biomarker testing such as the conventional Galactomannan (GM) from BALF, tracheal aspirate, and serum specimens. Other diagnostic tests that may prove useful also include Aspergillus PCR, serum (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG), the Aspergillus galactomannan lateral flow assay (LFA) (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma, USA), and the Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device (LFD) test (OLM Diagnostics, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK).
In published cases and case series from Germany [50,61], France [51,57,58], Italy [59], Austria [60], Belgium [52], Australia [63], and the Netherlands [47], CAPA was most commonly mycologically diagnosed by either culture from BALF or tracheal aspirate and/or based on a positive GM or LFD from BALF or tracheal aspirate (Table 1). Across published cases, Aspergillus culture was positive in 29/35 (83%) of patients; of those with a positive culture and a reported source, 16/29 (55%) were recovered from—often undirected—BALF, 12/29 (41%) from tracheal aspirate, and 1/29 (3%) from sputum. In those where a BALF GM test was performed, 14/23 (61%) had a titer ≥1.5 ODI and 16/23 (70%) a titer ≥0.5 ODI, while 6/28 (21%) of those with serum GM results had a titer > 0.5 ODI. PCR from respiratory specimens or tissue was positive in 10/14 (71%) and LFD from tracheal secretion positive in 1/1 of patients.
Thus, BALF and tracheal aspirate culture and conventional GM testing from BALF appear to be the most promising diagnostic modalities. Still, bronchoscopy can potentially aerosolize virus [78] in patients with COVID-19 infection, thus posing a risk to patients and personnel from SARS-CoV-2 virus. In many centers, the role of bronchoscopy is limited and testing from blood samples may be safer and more optimal and allow also for twice weekly screening which has been implemented in many centers [52], although the low levels of GM positivity from serum in these reports is discouraging, and the sensitivity of serum BDG, which is less specific for IA, was only 44% (4/9).
6. CAPA Treatment—Current Paradigm
While it is currently unknown whether antifungal treatment of COVID-19 associated IPA translates into a survival benefit, diagnosis should in most cases trigger early antifungal treatment. Outside the hematologic malignancy setting, voriconazole remains the recommended first-line treatment for IPA [79,80]. However, besides its narrow therapeutic window and the requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure efficacy and prevent neuro and hepatotoxicity [81], drug–drug interactions may particularly limit the use of voriconazole in the ICU setting [82]. Being metabolized via CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4, voriconazole is among the drugs most frequently associated with major drug–drug interactions in the ICU [83]. Furthermore, it may show interactions with experimental COVID-19 therapies, including hydroxychloroquine, atazanavir, lopinavir/ritonavir and last but not least—although weaker—with remdesivir, which is also a substrate for CYP3A4, although its metabolism is primarily mediated by hydrolase activity [84]. Isavuconazole and liposomal amphotericin B are the primary alternative options for treatment of IPA in the ICU [79]. Compared to voriconazole, isavuconazole shows a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and is associated with fewer toxicities. However, it is also metabolized via CYP3A4 and could therefore be problematic, although drug–drug interactions are generally less a problem with isavuconazole than with voriconazole [85,86]. Liposomal amphotericin B is a broadly effective alternative treatment option, however, in the ICU renal insufficiency often complicates initiation or requires discontinuation of this antifungal agent. This concern is particularly relevant for patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 which has shown renal tropism and been described as a frequent cause of kidney injury [87]. While itraconazole is now rarely used to treat invasive aspergillosis, it has been shown to exhibit some antiviral activity, specifically as a cholesterol transport inhibitor, and was effective in a feline coronavirus model [88]. In addition, its novel oral SUBA formulation has great bioavailability [89], and itraconazole may therefore be an alternative option for treating COVID-19 associated IPA, although it shares the problem of drug–drug interactions with other triazoles. While currently available echinocandins are not considered first-line treatment options for invasive aspergillosis due to their limited antifungal activity against Aspergillus spp., they are generally well tolerated with limited drug–drug interactions and show at least fungistatic activity against Aspergillus hyphae [90]. Furthermore, they synergistic interactions with some other antifungals, making them an excellent choice for combination antifungal therapy [90]. New antifungal classes currently under development, namely fosmanogepix and olorofim [91], may have equal efficacy without the same burden of drug–drug interactions and toxicity, and may therefore overcome the limitations of currently available antifungals and become the preferred treatment options in the near future. If the reported high incidence of COVID-19 associated IPA in ICU patients is confirmed in larger studies, there may be justification for prophylaxis trials, for which not only triazoles and nebulized liposomal amphotericin B [52], but also another novel antifungal currently under development, rezafungin (i.e., once weekly echinocandin with improved activity against Aspergillus spp.), may be a candidate [92].
7. The Current Challenges and How to Tackle Them
Bacterial, fungal and viral secondary infections or co-infections affect mortality. Acinetobacter baumanii, Klebsiella pneumonia and Aspergillus species are important nosocomial pathogens [93] complicating the disease course. Studies from France [51], Germany [50], Belgium [52], and the Netherlands [47], underline the role of CAPA. Diagnosing co-infections is complex and rapid diagnosis plays a crucial role in this setting [49]. Close monitoring for infection development is needed, as well as longitudinal sampling throughout the disease course using culture dependent and independent techniques. Aspergillus antigen and PCR testing of respiratory fluids should be a routine procedure for critically ill patients [94], specifically for those suffering from ARDS [50]. Co-infection with human metapneumovirus has been reported in two of five cases in the German CAPA series [50]. It is unknown whether hospitals caring for COVID-19 test comprehensive respiratory pathogen panels, and to date no analysis of mixed viral infection in COVID-19 patients has been reported. In the context of COVID-19, mixed viral infection may be misinterpreted as presence of innocent bystanders and thus remain underreported. With bronchoalveolar lavage and autopsy regarded as high-risk procedures, key diagnostic instruments are lacking. Autopsy studies are key to understanding pathophysiology of COVID-19 [95] and are critically enlighten interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and different pathogens. With availability of lower respiratory samples, normally obtained by BALF, the quality of microbiological and virological work up would be greatly improved. Inspection of trachea and bronchi is achieved by bronchoscopy, which is critical to find possible Aspergillus tracheobronchitis. Thus, physicians face the dilemma of taking the hazard of aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2, risking transmission versus the endeavor of facilitating the optimal diagnosis and treatment to the patients entrusted to their care.
To this day, our understanding of the true impact of Aspergillus co-infections remains frustratingly limited. Therefore, guidance on proper management of these high-risk procedures to prevent transmission and super spreading of SARS-CoV-2 is needed. The European Confederation of Medical Mycology initiated national multicenter studies aiming to explore the risk of fungal infections during COVID-19 [94] and is currently working on diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Key goals are to improve the outcome by avoiding misdiagnosis and by initiation of early and targeted antifungal treatment.
8. Future Perspectives
We anticipate that autopsies of COVID-19 fatalities will increase and likely prove the clinical relevance of CAPA [96]. Immune dysregulation together with epithelial lung damage stemming from COVID-19 immunopathology is a likely mechanism predisposing for IPA development [97]. IPA will be recognized as important co-infection in patients with severe COVID-19, but incidence will likely vary between different ICU settings. In settings where COVID-19 associated IPA occurs most commonly, screening for IPA in blood and true BALF samples (i.e., obtained via bronchoscopy) will be implemented followed by preemptive treatment in those with mycological evidence of IPA. In other high-incidence settings, clinical antifungal prophylaxis trials will be conducted among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU aiming to show a decrease in putative [4] and proven IPA cases, as well as overall mortality. Treatment trials will compare efficacy and safety of new antifungal drugs currently under development with established antifungals, initiating a new era of antifungal treatment.
|
|
sec
|
1. Introduction
Invasive fungal infections caused by various fungal genera, including Aspergillus, complicate and endanger lives of millions of individuals annually [1]. Aspergillus genera, most frequently Aspergillus fumigatus, are ubiquitous in the environment and cause a wide range of infections in humans, including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), chronic rhinosinusitis, fungal asthma, and Aspergillus bronchitis [2,3]. IPA, the most severe manifestation of disease from Aspergillus, is associated with high mortality rates and is a prominent complication among those with profound immunosuppression, such as those undergoing hematopoietic transplantation, as well as those with structural lung damage who receive systemic corticosteroids for their underlying condition, such as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) [2].
Recently, it has been reported that a relatively high number of influenza patients presenting with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) also rapidly develop IPA, which is associated with increased duration of hospitalization and mortality [4,5]. Corticosteroid use and pulmonary epithelial damages caused by severe influenza are the main risk factors for developing IPA [4,5]. The recent global pandemic of coronavirus disease-19, also known as COVID-19, has infected over 6 million patients worldwide, with more than 360,000 deaths. It has been shown that up to 40% of COVID-19 hospitalized patients can develop ARDS [6], and thereby become susceptible to acquire co-infections caused by bacteria and also Aspergillus spp. [7,8], although frequency of co-infections seems to vary between centers and overall co-infections may occur less frequently than with severe influenza [9]. Once they occur, these superinfections are associated with high mortality rates and may prolong the acute phase of COVID-19 [10]. In this comprehensive review, we discuss various aspects of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), focusing specifically on immunology, risk factors, prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and current challenges.
|
|
title
|
1. Introduction
|
|
p
|
Invasive fungal infections caused by various fungal genera, including Aspergillus, complicate and endanger lives of millions of individuals annually [1]. Aspergillus genera, most frequently Aspergillus fumigatus, are ubiquitous in the environment and cause a wide range of infections in humans, including invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA), allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), chronic rhinosinusitis, fungal asthma, and Aspergillus bronchitis [2,3]. IPA, the most severe manifestation of disease from Aspergillus, is associated with high mortality rates and is a prominent complication among those with profound immunosuppression, such as those undergoing hematopoietic transplantation, as well as those with structural lung damage who receive systemic corticosteroids for their underlying condition, such as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) [2].
|
|
p
|
Recently, it has been reported that a relatively high number of influenza patients presenting with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) also rapidly develop IPA, which is associated with increased duration of hospitalization and mortality [4,5]. Corticosteroid use and pulmonary epithelial damages caused by severe influenza are the main risk factors for developing IPA [4,5]. The recent global pandemic of coronavirus disease-19, also known as COVID-19, has infected over 6 million patients worldwide, with more than 360,000 deaths. It has been shown that up to 40% of COVID-19 hospitalized patients can develop ARDS [6], and thereby become susceptible to acquire co-infections caused by bacteria and also Aspergillus spp. [7,8], although frequency of co-infections seems to vary between centers and overall co-infections may occur less frequently than with severe influenza [9]. Once they occur, these superinfections are associated with high mortality rates and may prolong the acute phase of COVID-19 [10]. In this comprehensive review, we discuss various aspects of COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), focusing specifically on immunology, risk factors, prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and current challenges.
|
|
sec
|
2. Immunology
Dissecting the complex pathogenesis of CAPA requires a molecular understanding of the physiological processes whereby infection with SARS-CoV-2 facilitates fungal pathogenesis. Similar to other SARS coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 targets and invades epithelial cells and type II pneumocytes through binding of the SARS spike protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors [11]. Cleavage of the S1/S2 domain by the type 2 transmembrane protease TMPRSS2 leads to the activation of the spike protein [12], thereby facilitating viral entry into the target cell via ACE2. Besides its role as a SARS virus receptor, ACE2 was also demonstrated to be required for protection from severe acute lung injury in ARDS [13]. In support of this, an insertion/deletion polymorphism that affects ACE activity was associated with ARDS susceptibility and outcome [14]. Whether the preceding interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with host cells, by disrupting the regulation of the renin-angiotensin system and or the kallikrein-kinin system, contributes to the development of CAPA, is not known.
Viral entry and infection elicit an immune response, which is initiated by the establishment of an inflammatory cascade by innate immune cells. Although the receptor(s) and signaling pathways involved in the immune recognition of Aspergillus and the downstream production of inflammatory mediators are relatively well characterized [15], not much is known regarding how the immune system senses and responds to SARS-CoV-2. Based on the available knowledge for infections with other coronaviruses, two possible mechanisms can be anticipated and are likely to explain the development of ARDS and consequently CAPA. The first involves the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), signal molecules released by dying or damaged cells that act as endogenous danger signals to promote and exacerbate the immune and inflammatory response leading to lung injury [16]. It is noteworthy that DAMPs have also been shown to regulate inflammation in fungal diseases [17]. The DAMP/receptor for advanced glycation end-products axis was found to integrate with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to generate and amplify the inflammatory response in experimental aspergillosis [18]. Moreover, recipients of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation harboring genetic variants underlying a hyperactivation of danger signaling in response to infection displayed an increased risk of developing IPA [19]. This emerging concept could help explain fungal pathogenesis in conditions of exuberant inflammation such as that observed in COVID-19 patients and highlights DAMP targeting as potential immunomodulatory strategy in CAPA.
A second possibility involves the collateral effects of recognition pathways required for the activation of antiviral immunity that may, paradoxically, contribute to an inflammatory environment that favors secondary infections. ACE2 is not well expressed on immune cells and SARS-CoV are recognized by TLR4 and TLR3, leading to the activation of MyD88- or TRIF-mediated signaling, respectively [20,21]. Of note, this may be potentiated in the presence of Aspergillus spp. which activate TLR4/MyD88/TRIF through the cleavage of fibrinogen [22]. It is likely that SARS-CoV-2 may elicit, to a large extent, overlapping signaling pathways towards the production of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, the activation of the inflammasome by SARS-CoV and the consequent production of IL-1β is an event that contributes further to the hyperinflammatory response [23]. A transcriptome analysis of COVID-19 patients revealed an early immune response characterized by a marked upregulation of the IL-1 pathway, even after respiratory function nadir [24]. The possibility that IL-1 and related pro-inflammatory pathways could serve as therapeutic targets was demonstrated by the favorable responses in severe COVID-19 patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra [25]. Similar findings were also disclosed in acute leukemia patients with COVID-19 [26]. Likewise, IL-1 blockade with anakinra has also been found to ameliorate inflammation in both chronic granulomatous disease [27] and cystic fibrosis [28], and in either case, to restrain susceptibility to infection or colonization by Aspergillus. Therefore, the early hyperactivation of the IL-1 pathway induced by the SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a major factor establishing a highly permissive inflammatory environment that favors fungal pathogenesis.
Besides IL-1, increased levels of IL-6 have also been consistently reported in severe cases of COVID-19 [29,30], with an impact on immune cell function and the anti-viral mechanisms of immune cells [31]. An enhanced production of IL-6 is also observed in epithelial cells following infection with A. fumigatus, suggesting that, at least in some patients, the co-infection may contribute to the increased levels of this cytokine in severe COVID-19 patients [32]. In a large patient series of COVID-19 patients with ARDS, the use of the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab was recently reported to promote rapid and sustained responses associated with significant clinical improvement [33]. However, such clinical approach could paradoxically enhance the predisposition to CAPA, similar to animal models of IL-6 deficiency subjected to experimental aspergillosis [34]. For this reason, ongoing trials are addressing the combined use of IL-6 antagonists and antifungal prophylaxis in severe COVID-19 patients.
An emerging body of evidence supports therefore an increased systemic inflammatory reaction in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection who are more likely to develop CAPA. In this regard, increased levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, were observed in patients requiring intensive care, compared to those with milder infections [35]. Other studies, however, have also unveiled marked defects in immune cell populations, namely T-lymphocytes, as another factor explaining the immune dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 [36]. This suggests that while sustained innate immune function leads to hyperinflammation [37], lymphocyte numbers decline, and their function may be defective. In this regard, severe lymphocytopenia was among the factors in a risk score model that predicted the development of invasive mold disease in patients with hematological malignances [38]. It is thus reasonable to speculate that in elderly individuals or with co-morbidities, defective immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 may allow unrestricted viral replication which, in turn, elicits hyperinflammation and severe complications such as ARDS [39], besides establishing favorable conditions for the acquisition of secondary infections, such as CAPA.
While there is much to be learned about CAPA, our current understanding of the pathophysiology of other coinfections with respiratory viruses such as influenza [40] provides an important framework towards the effective design of immunotherapeutic approaches and the identification of the patients that could benefit the most from them.
|
|
title
|
2. Immunology
|
|
p
|
Dissecting the complex pathogenesis of CAPA requires a molecular understanding of the physiological processes whereby infection with SARS-CoV-2 facilitates fungal pathogenesis. Similar to other SARS coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 targets and invades epithelial cells and type II pneumocytes through binding of the SARS spike protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors [11]. Cleavage of the S1/S2 domain by the type 2 transmembrane protease TMPRSS2 leads to the activation of the spike protein [12], thereby facilitating viral entry into the target cell via ACE2. Besides its role as a SARS virus receptor, ACE2 was also demonstrated to be required for protection from severe acute lung injury in ARDS [13]. In support of this, an insertion/deletion polymorphism that affects ACE activity was associated with ARDS susceptibility and outcome [14]. Whether the preceding interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with host cells, by disrupting the regulation of the renin-angiotensin system and or the kallikrein-kinin system, contributes to the development of CAPA, is not known.
|
|
p
|
Viral entry and infection elicit an immune response, which is initiated by the establishment of an inflammatory cascade by innate immune cells. Although the receptor(s) and signaling pathways involved in the immune recognition of Aspergillus and the downstream production of inflammatory mediators are relatively well characterized [15], not much is known regarding how the immune system senses and responds to SARS-CoV-2. Based on the available knowledge for infections with other coronaviruses, two possible mechanisms can be anticipated and are likely to explain the development of ARDS and consequently CAPA. The first involves the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), signal molecules released by dying or damaged cells that act as endogenous danger signals to promote and exacerbate the immune and inflammatory response leading to lung injury [16]. It is noteworthy that DAMPs have also been shown to regulate inflammation in fungal diseases [17]. The DAMP/receptor for advanced glycation end-products axis was found to integrate with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to generate and amplify the inflammatory response in experimental aspergillosis [18]. Moreover, recipients of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation harboring genetic variants underlying a hyperactivation of danger signaling in response to infection displayed an increased risk of developing IPA [19]. This emerging concept could help explain fungal pathogenesis in conditions of exuberant inflammation such as that observed in COVID-19 patients and highlights DAMP targeting as potential immunomodulatory strategy in CAPA.
|
|
p
|
A second possibility involves the collateral effects of recognition pathways required for the activation of antiviral immunity that may, paradoxically, contribute to an inflammatory environment that favors secondary infections. ACE2 is not well expressed on immune cells and SARS-CoV are recognized by TLR4 and TLR3, leading to the activation of MyD88- or TRIF-mediated signaling, respectively [20,21]. Of note, this may be potentiated in the presence of Aspergillus spp. which activate TLR4/MyD88/TRIF through the cleavage of fibrinogen [22]. It is likely that SARS-CoV-2 may elicit, to a large extent, overlapping signaling pathways towards the production of inflammatory cytokines. In addition, the activation of the inflammasome by SARS-CoV and the consequent production of IL-1β is an event that contributes further to the hyperinflammatory response [23]. A transcriptome analysis of COVID-19 patients revealed an early immune response characterized by a marked upregulation of the IL-1 pathway, even after respiratory function nadir [24]. The possibility that IL-1 and related pro-inflammatory pathways could serve as therapeutic targets was demonstrated by the favorable responses in severe COVID-19 patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra [25]. Similar findings were also disclosed in acute leukemia patients with COVID-19 [26]. Likewise, IL-1 blockade with anakinra has also been found to ameliorate inflammation in both chronic granulomatous disease [27] and cystic fibrosis [28], and in either case, to restrain susceptibility to infection or colonization by Aspergillus. Therefore, the early hyperactivation of the IL-1 pathway induced by the SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a major factor establishing a highly permissive inflammatory environment that favors fungal pathogenesis.
|
|
p
|
Besides IL-1, increased levels of IL-6 have also been consistently reported in severe cases of COVID-19 [29,30], with an impact on immune cell function and the anti-viral mechanisms of immune cells [31]. An enhanced production of IL-6 is also observed in epithelial cells following infection with A. fumigatus, suggesting that, at least in some patients, the co-infection may contribute to the increased levels of this cytokine in severe COVID-19 patients [32]. In a large patient series of COVID-19 patients with ARDS, the use of the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab was recently reported to promote rapid and sustained responses associated with significant clinical improvement [33]. However, such clinical approach could paradoxically enhance the predisposition to CAPA, similar to animal models of IL-6 deficiency subjected to experimental aspergillosis [34]. For this reason, ongoing trials are addressing the combined use of IL-6 antagonists and antifungal prophylaxis in severe COVID-19 patients.
|
|
p
|
An emerging body of evidence supports therefore an increased systemic inflammatory reaction in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection who are more likely to develop CAPA. In this regard, increased levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, were observed in patients requiring intensive care, compared to those with milder infections [35]. Other studies, however, have also unveiled marked defects in immune cell populations, namely T-lymphocytes, as another factor explaining the immune dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 [36]. This suggests that while sustained innate immune function leads to hyperinflammation [37], lymphocyte numbers decline, and their function may be defective. In this regard, severe lymphocytopenia was among the factors in a risk score model that predicted the development of invasive mold disease in patients with hematological malignances [38]. It is thus reasonable to speculate that in elderly individuals or with co-morbidities, defective immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 may allow unrestricted viral replication which, in turn, elicits hyperinflammation and severe complications such as ARDS [39], besides establishing favorable conditions for the acquisition of secondary infections, such as CAPA.
|
|
p
|
While there is much to be learned about CAPA, our current understanding of the pathophysiology of other coinfections with respiratory viruses such as influenza [40] provides an important framework towards the effective design of immunotherapeutic approaches and the identification of the patients that could benefit the most from them.
|
|
sec
|
3. Risk Factors Implicated in CAPA Development
Importantly, the pathogenesis of IPA differs between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, including those with COVID-19, impacting clinical presentation, radiological findings and diagnostic test results in the mycology laboratory [41,42]. Despite these important differences, revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions [43] focus primarily on neutropenic patients with underlying hematological malignancies and “typical” presentation of IPA and have been shown to have limited applicability and inferior performance in non-neutropenic patients who frequently do not fulfil radiological and host criteria, including patients with COVID-19 [41,44]. This has resulted in the creation of an alternative clinical algorithm for diagnosing IPA in the ICU setting in 2012 [41], which defines putative IPA and is now the standard of care for defining IPA in the ICU [4,45], where highly reliable definitions of IA are still missing (work on improved definitions is currently in progress [45,46]).
Rapid development of CAPA few days following ICU admission [47] resembles the observation made for influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis [4,5]. Risk factors predisposing COVID-19 patients to develop secondary pulmonary aspergillosis are similar to those identified for influenza-IPA superinfections [4,5]. The most important risk factors include severe lung damage during the course of COVID-19 [48], the use of corticosteroids in those with ARDS, the widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in intensive care units [49], and the presence of comorbidities such as structural lung defects [47,50,51,52].
There are some reports revealing that pulmonary fibrosis can be triggered by the cytokine storm activated by the viral antigens, toxicity posed by drugs, high airway pressure and hypoxia-induced acute lung injury secondary to mechanical ventilation [53]. While interstitial pulmonary fibrosis per se does not predispose to development of IPA, a small subset of these COVID-19 survivors may require long term corticosteroid treatment, which may predispose them to CAPA years after the acute phase of the viral infection. Overall, 29% of the CAPA cases published to date (10/35) had received systemic corticosteroids (Table 1). In those with ARDS, systemic corticosteroids are used to alleviate the immune responses and prevent cytokine storm [6,54,55,56], but may at the same time increase vulnerability for developing secondary infections [4,5].
Although detailed case series have not reported on antibiotic use among patients, broad-spectrum antibiotics are presumed to be used in 75% of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU [49]. Since the human gut microbiome is a highly complicated structure of bacteria and fungi, although bacteria are the most diverse constituents, the administration of antibiotics results in perturbation of microbiome steady-state composition, which allows fungi to thrive, and may predispose the host to invasive fungal infections once the immune system becomes impaired [65,66].
Underlying medical conditions may also predispose COVID-19 patients to develop CAPA. Among the 35 CAPA cases published to date (Table 1), hypertension (17/35; 49%), diabetes (9/35; 26%), obesity (8/35; 23%), COPD (5/35; 14%), heart diseases (5/35; 14%), hypercholesterinemia (4/35; 11%), and asthma (3/35; 9%) were among the most prevalent comorbidities observed. While hypertension, coronary heart diseases, and diabetes increase the risk of infection overall [67,68,69], structural lung damage caused by COPD or asthma may particularly predispose patients to develop IPA [70].
|
|
title
|
3. Risk Factors Implicated in CAPA Development
|
|
p
|
Importantly, the pathogenesis of IPA differs between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, including those with COVID-19, impacting clinical presentation, radiological findings and diagnostic test results in the mycology laboratory [41,42]. Despite these important differences, revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) definitions [43] focus primarily on neutropenic patients with underlying hematological malignancies and “typical” presentation of IPA and have been shown to have limited applicability and inferior performance in non-neutropenic patients who frequently do not fulfil radiological and host criteria, including patients with COVID-19 [41,44]. This has resulted in the creation of an alternative clinical algorithm for diagnosing IPA in the ICU setting in 2012 [41], which defines putative IPA and is now the standard of care for defining IPA in the ICU [4,45], where highly reliable definitions of IA are still missing (work on improved definitions is currently in progress [45,46]).
|
|
p
|
Rapid development of CAPA few days following ICU admission [47] resembles the observation made for influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis [4,5]. Risk factors predisposing COVID-19 patients to develop secondary pulmonary aspergillosis are similar to those identified for influenza-IPA superinfections [4,5]. The most important risk factors include severe lung damage during the course of COVID-19 [48], the use of corticosteroids in those with ARDS, the widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in intensive care units [49], and the presence of comorbidities such as structural lung defects [47,50,51,52].
|
|
p
|
There are some reports revealing that pulmonary fibrosis can be triggered by the cytokine storm activated by the viral antigens, toxicity posed by drugs, high airway pressure and hypoxia-induced acute lung injury secondary to mechanical ventilation [53]. While interstitial pulmonary fibrosis per se does not predispose to development of IPA, a small subset of these COVID-19 survivors may require long term corticosteroid treatment, which may predispose them to CAPA years after the acute phase of the viral infection. Overall, 29% of the CAPA cases published to date (10/35) had received systemic corticosteroids (Table 1). In those with ARDS, systemic corticosteroids are used to alleviate the immune responses and prevent cytokine storm [6,54,55,56], but may at the same time increase vulnerability for developing secondary infections [4,5].
|
|
p
|
Although detailed case series have not reported on antibiotic use among patients, broad-spectrum antibiotics are presumed to be used in 75% of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU [49]. Since the human gut microbiome is a highly complicated structure of bacteria and fungi, although bacteria are the most diverse constituents, the administration of antibiotics results in perturbation of microbiome steady-state composition, which allows fungi to thrive, and may predispose the host to invasive fungal infections once the immune system becomes impaired [65,66].
|
|
p
|
Underlying medical conditions may also predispose COVID-19 patients to develop CAPA. Among the 35 CAPA cases published to date (Table 1), hypertension (17/35; 49%), diabetes (9/35; 26%), obesity (8/35; 23%), COPD (5/35; 14%), heart diseases (5/35; 14%), hypercholesterinemia (4/35; 11%), and asthma (3/35; 9%) were among the most prevalent comorbidities observed. While hypertension, coronary heart diseases, and diabetes increase the risk of infection overall [67,68,69], structural lung damage caused by COPD or asthma may particularly predispose patients to develop IPA [70].
|
|
sec
|
4. CAPA Prevalence
Several studies from China reported high rates of Aspergillus infections among COVID-19 patients. In one study from the Jiangsu province in China, 60/257 COVID-19 (23.3%) patients had throat swab samples that tested positive for Aspergillus spp. and were reported as Aspergillus co-infections [8]. In another Chinese study from the Zhejiang province 8 of the 104 patients with COVID-19 (7.7%) patients were reported to have IPA although questions remain regarding criteria used for diagnosing IPA in this study (authors state EORTC/MSG criteria were used but all 8 patients seemingly lacked host factors) [71]. Another study from China reported that 27% of the COVID-19 patients (13/48) developed fungal infections but lacked further details [7]. In other reports from China, lower rates of fungal infections were reported ranging between 3.2–5% [54,55,72]. None of those studies have used specific definitions and standardized diagnostic algorithms to identify and define CAPA. In fact, diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging with culture exhibiting limited sensitivity [73,74], and galactomannan testing—the current gold standard—is rarely available in China [75]. As a result, some of these reported rates are likely an underestimate of the real burden of IPA in patients with COVID-19 requiring ICU admission, while other rates may be an overestimation due to potentially misinterpreting Aspergillus colonization in the upper respiratory tract as Aspergillus infection.
More recently, several studies and case-series from Europe (France, Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands) have reported high rates of CAPA among COVID-19 cases with ARDS, ranging from 20–35% (Table 1) [47,50,51,52]. The development of CAPA was fairly rapid, with a median of 6 days and range of 3–28 days after ICU admission [47,52]. Moreover, two additional CAPA cases have been reported from Germany [61] and single cases have also been reported from the Netherlands [62], Austria [60], Italy [59], Australia [63], and France [57,58] (Table 1). Among 35 CAPA cases reported to date, there were a total of 5 proven cases [52,59]. The overall mortality rate was 63% (22/35), among whom 4 were female (4/8; 50%) and 14 were male (18/27; 67%). The mortality in case series reported from France, Germany, Belgium and Netherlands ranged between 44.5–66.7% [47,50,51,52]. Of particular importance was the 100% fatality rate of those with underlying diseases reported from the Netherlands, while the two patients without underlying conditions both survived [47]. Noteworthy is the fact that COVID-19 patients presented with ARDS typically fall into the elderly category [6], whereas ARDS in those infected with influenza involves both children <5 years old and elderly >65 years old [76]. The difficulties in diagnosing CAPA, which are outlined in more detail in the next section of this review, may also contribute to increased mortality rates. The most notable example is a study from France [57], where both culture and serology assays were negative for the initial respiratory samples and became only positive after the patient expired [57]. In a case from Italy, initial BALF culture was positive for A. fumigatus but the treatment was delayed for two days and only started after the serum galactomannan test became positive [59]. CAPA was later confirmed by autopsy examination [59]. As a result, authors encouraged prompt initiation of systemic antifungal therapy immediately after obtaining positive results even if Aspergillus is detected in samples from the upper respiratory tract [59]. Since azole resistance can be associated with a higher mortality rate when compared to patients infected with azole susceptible A. fumigatus isolates, it is of paramount importance to use antifungal susceptibility testing to inform targeted antifungal treatment, especially in regions with high azole resistance [77]. Azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates were also persistently recovered from tracheal aspirates during the course of azole treatment in the most recent study from the Netherlands implicated a CAPA case for whom [62]. The azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolate (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole MICs were 16, 2, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively) harbored a well-known mutation, TR34/L98H [62], presumed to have been acquired from the environment [77]. The in vitro MIC value of the isolate obtained at day 19 (2 mg/L) was higher than the voriconazole serum trough concentration measured on day 17 (1.43 mg/L) and despite switching voriconazole to l-AmB, the patient died due to deteriorating health conditions [62]. Overall, A. fumigatus appeared to be the most prevalent Aspergillus spp. isolated among respiratory samples with positive culture (26/29; 90%), followed by A. flavus (2/29; 7%).
|
|
title
|
4. CAPA Prevalence
|
|
p
|
Several studies from China reported high rates of Aspergillus infections among COVID-19 patients. In one study from the Jiangsu province in China, 60/257 COVID-19 (23.3%) patients had throat swab samples that tested positive for Aspergillus spp. and were reported as Aspergillus co-infections [8]. In another Chinese study from the Zhejiang province 8 of the 104 patients with COVID-19 (7.7%) patients were reported to have IPA although questions remain regarding criteria used for diagnosing IPA in this study (authors state EORTC/MSG criteria were used but all 8 patients seemingly lacked host factors) [71]. Another study from China reported that 27% of the COVID-19 patients (13/48) developed fungal infections but lacked further details [7]. In other reports from China, lower rates of fungal infections were reported ranging between 3.2–5% [54,55,72]. None of those studies have used specific definitions and standardized diagnostic algorithms to identify and define CAPA. In fact, diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging with culture exhibiting limited sensitivity [73,74], and galactomannan testing—the current gold standard—is rarely available in China [75]. As a result, some of these reported rates are likely an underestimate of the real burden of IPA in patients with COVID-19 requiring ICU admission, while other rates may be an overestimation due to potentially misinterpreting Aspergillus colonization in the upper respiratory tract as Aspergillus infection.
|
|
p
|
More recently, several studies and case-series from Europe (France, Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands) have reported high rates of CAPA among COVID-19 cases with ARDS, ranging from 20–35% (Table 1) [47,50,51,52]. The development of CAPA was fairly rapid, with a median of 6 days and range of 3–28 days after ICU admission [47,52]. Moreover, two additional CAPA cases have been reported from Germany [61] and single cases have also been reported from the Netherlands [62], Austria [60], Italy [59], Australia [63], and France [57,58] (Table 1). Among 35 CAPA cases reported to date, there were a total of 5 proven cases [52,59]. The overall mortality rate was 63% (22/35), among whom 4 were female (4/8; 50%) and 14 were male (18/27; 67%). The mortality in case series reported from France, Germany, Belgium and Netherlands ranged between 44.5–66.7% [47,50,51,52]. Of particular importance was the 100% fatality rate of those with underlying diseases reported from the Netherlands, while the two patients without underlying conditions both survived [47]. Noteworthy is the fact that COVID-19 patients presented with ARDS typically fall into the elderly category [6], whereas ARDS in those infected with influenza involves both children <5 years old and elderly >65 years old [76]. The difficulties in diagnosing CAPA, which are outlined in more detail in the next section of this review, may also contribute to increased mortality rates. The most notable example is a study from France [57], where both culture and serology assays were negative for the initial respiratory samples and became only positive after the patient expired [57]. In a case from Italy, initial BALF culture was positive for A. fumigatus but the treatment was delayed for two days and only started after the serum galactomannan test became positive [59]. CAPA was later confirmed by autopsy examination [59]. As a result, authors encouraged prompt initiation of systemic antifungal therapy immediately after obtaining positive results even if Aspergillus is detected in samples from the upper respiratory tract [59]. Since azole resistance can be associated with a higher mortality rate when compared to patients infected with azole susceptible A. fumigatus isolates, it is of paramount importance to use antifungal susceptibility testing to inform targeted antifungal treatment, especially in regions with high azole resistance [77]. Azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates were also persistently recovered from tracheal aspirates during the course of azole treatment in the most recent study from the Netherlands implicated a CAPA case for whom [62]. The azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolate (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole MICs were 16, 2, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively) harbored a well-known mutation, TR34/L98H [62], presumed to have been acquired from the environment [77]. The in vitro MIC value of the isolate obtained at day 19 (2 mg/L) was higher than the voriconazole serum trough concentration measured on day 17 (1.43 mg/L) and despite switching voriconazole to l-AmB, the patient died due to deteriorating health conditions [62]. Overall, A. fumigatus appeared to be the most prevalent Aspergillus spp. isolated among respiratory samples with positive culture (26/29; 90%), followed by A. flavus (2/29; 7%).
|
|
sec
|
5. Diagnostic Workup for Accurate Identification of CAPA
The optimal diagnostic algorithm for diagnosing CAPA is currently unknown, and this question is actively being investigated in an ongoing multinational explorative trial in conjunction with the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). The most common methods to date include attempting to recover Aspergillus spp. on culture media of bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) and tracheal aspirate, as well as utilizing serologic biomarker testing such as the conventional Galactomannan (GM) from BALF, tracheal aspirate, and serum specimens. Other diagnostic tests that may prove useful also include Aspergillus PCR, serum (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG), the Aspergillus galactomannan lateral flow assay (LFA) (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma, USA), and the Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device (LFD) test (OLM Diagnostics, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK).
In published cases and case series from Germany [50,61], France [51,57,58], Italy [59], Austria [60], Belgium [52], Australia [63], and the Netherlands [47], CAPA was most commonly mycologically diagnosed by either culture from BALF or tracheal aspirate and/or based on a positive GM or LFD from BALF or tracheal aspirate (Table 1). Across published cases, Aspergillus culture was positive in 29/35 (83%) of patients; of those with a positive culture and a reported source, 16/29 (55%) were recovered from—often undirected—BALF, 12/29 (41%) from tracheal aspirate, and 1/29 (3%) from sputum. In those where a BALF GM test was performed, 14/23 (61%) had a titer ≥1.5 ODI and 16/23 (70%) a titer ≥0.5 ODI, while 6/28 (21%) of those with serum GM results had a titer > 0.5 ODI. PCR from respiratory specimens or tissue was positive in 10/14 (71%) and LFD from tracheal secretion positive in 1/1 of patients.
Thus, BALF and tracheal aspirate culture and conventional GM testing from BALF appear to be the most promising diagnostic modalities. Still, bronchoscopy can potentially aerosolize virus [78] in patients with COVID-19 infection, thus posing a risk to patients and personnel from SARS-CoV-2 virus. In many centers, the role of bronchoscopy is limited and testing from blood samples may be safer and more optimal and allow also for twice weekly screening which has been implemented in many centers [52], although the low levels of GM positivity from serum in these reports is discouraging, and the sensitivity of serum BDG, which is less specific for IA, was only 44% (4/9).
|
|
title
|
5. Diagnostic Workup for Accurate Identification of CAPA
|
|
p
|
The optimal diagnostic algorithm for diagnosing CAPA is currently unknown, and this question is actively being investigated in an ongoing multinational explorative trial in conjunction with the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). The most common methods to date include attempting to recover Aspergillus spp. on culture media of bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) and tracheal aspirate, as well as utilizing serologic biomarker testing such as the conventional Galactomannan (GM) from BALF, tracheal aspirate, and serum specimens. Other diagnostic tests that may prove useful also include Aspergillus PCR, serum (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG), the Aspergillus galactomannan lateral flow assay (LFA) (IMMY, Norman, Oklahoma, USA), and the Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device (LFD) test (OLM Diagnostics, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK).
|
|
p
|
In published cases and case series from Germany [50,61], France [51,57,58], Italy [59], Austria [60], Belgium [52], Australia [63], and the Netherlands [47], CAPA was most commonly mycologically diagnosed by either culture from BALF or tracheal aspirate and/or based on a positive GM or LFD from BALF or tracheal aspirate (Table 1). Across published cases, Aspergillus culture was positive in 29/35 (83%) of patients; of those with a positive culture and a reported source, 16/29 (55%) were recovered from—often undirected—BALF, 12/29 (41%) from tracheal aspirate, and 1/29 (3%) from sputum. In those where a BALF GM test was performed, 14/23 (61%) had a titer ≥1.5 ODI and 16/23 (70%) a titer ≥0.5 ODI, while 6/28 (21%) of those with serum GM results had a titer > 0.5 ODI. PCR from respiratory specimens or tissue was positive in 10/14 (71%) and LFD from tracheal secretion positive in 1/1 of patients.
|
|
p
|
Thus, BALF and tracheal aspirate culture and conventional GM testing from BALF appear to be the most promising diagnostic modalities. Still, bronchoscopy can potentially aerosolize virus [78] in patients with COVID-19 infection, thus posing a risk to patients and personnel from SARS-CoV-2 virus. In many centers, the role of bronchoscopy is limited and testing from blood samples may be safer and more optimal and allow also for twice weekly screening which has been implemented in many centers [52], although the low levels of GM positivity from serum in these reports is discouraging, and the sensitivity of serum BDG, which is less specific for IA, was only 44% (4/9).
|
|
sec
|
6. CAPA Treatment—Current Paradigm
While it is currently unknown whether antifungal treatment of COVID-19 associated IPA translates into a survival benefit, diagnosis should in most cases trigger early antifungal treatment. Outside the hematologic malignancy setting, voriconazole remains the recommended first-line treatment for IPA [79,80]. However, besides its narrow therapeutic window and the requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure efficacy and prevent neuro and hepatotoxicity [81], drug–drug interactions may particularly limit the use of voriconazole in the ICU setting [82]. Being metabolized via CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4, voriconazole is among the drugs most frequently associated with major drug–drug interactions in the ICU [83]. Furthermore, it may show interactions with experimental COVID-19 therapies, including hydroxychloroquine, atazanavir, lopinavir/ritonavir and last but not least—although weaker—with remdesivir, which is also a substrate for CYP3A4, although its metabolism is primarily mediated by hydrolase activity [84]. Isavuconazole and liposomal amphotericin B are the primary alternative options for treatment of IPA in the ICU [79]. Compared to voriconazole, isavuconazole shows a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and is associated with fewer toxicities. However, it is also metabolized via CYP3A4 and could therefore be problematic, although drug–drug interactions are generally less a problem with isavuconazole than with voriconazole [85,86]. Liposomal amphotericin B is a broadly effective alternative treatment option, however, in the ICU renal insufficiency often complicates initiation or requires discontinuation of this antifungal agent. This concern is particularly relevant for patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 which has shown renal tropism and been described as a frequent cause of kidney injury [87]. While itraconazole is now rarely used to treat invasive aspergillosis, it has been shown to exhibit some antiviral activity, specifically as a cholesterol transport inhibitor, and was effective in a feline coronavirus model [88]. In addition, its novel oral SUBA formulation has great bioavailability [89], and itraconazole may therefore be an alternative option for treating COVID-19 associated IPA, although it shares the problem of drug–drug interactions with other triazoles. While currently available echinocandins are not considered first-line treatment options for invasive aspergillosis due to their limited antifungal activity against Aspergillus spp., they are generally well tolerated with limited drug–drug interactions and show at least fungistatic activity against Aspergillus hyphae [90]. Furthermore, they synergistic interactions with some other antifungals, making them an excellent choice for combination antifungal therapy [90]. New antifungal classes currently under development, namely fosmanogepix and olorofim [91], may have equal efficacy without the same burden of drug–drug interactions and toxicity, and may therefore overcome the limitations of currently available antifungals and become the preferred treatment options in the near future. If the reported high incidence of COVID-19 associated IPA in ICU patients is confirmed in larger studies, there may be justification for prophylaxis trials, for which not only triazoles and nebulized liposomal amphotericin B [52], but also another novel antifungal currently under development, rezafungin (i.e., once weekly echinocandin with improved activity against Aspergillus spp.), may be a candidate [92].
|
|
title
|
6. CAPA Treatment—Current Paradigm
|
|
p
|
While it is currently unknown whether antifungal treatment of COVID-19 associated IPA translates into a survival benefit, diagnosis should in most cases trigger early antifungal treatment. Outside the hematologic malignancy setting, voriconazole remains the recommended first-line treatment for IPA [79,80]. However, besides its narrow therapeutic window and the requirement for therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure efficacy and prevent neuro and hepatotoxicity [81], drug–drug interactions may particularly limit the use of voriconazole in the ICU setting [82]. Being metabolized via CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4, voriconazole is among the drugs most frequently associated with major drug–drug interactions in the ICU [83]. Furthermore, it may show interactions with experimental COVID-19 therapies, including hydroxychloroquine, atazanavir, lopinavir/ritonavir and last but not least—although weaker—with remdesivir, which is also a substrate for CYP3A4, although its metabolism is primarily mediated by hydrolase activity [84]. Isavuconazole and liposomal amphotericin B are the primary alternative options for treatment of IPA in the ICU [79]. Compared to voriconazole, isavuconazole shows a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and is associated with fewer toxicities. However, it is also metabolized via CYP3A4 and could therefore be problematic, although drug–drug interactions are generally less a problem with isavuconazole than with voriconazole [85,86]. Liposomal amphotericin B is a broadly effective alternative treatment option, however, in the ICU renal insufficiency often complicates initiation or requires discontinuation of this antifungal agent. This concern is particularly relevant for patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 which has shown renal tropism and been described as a frequent cause of kidney injury [87]. While itraconazole is now rarely used to treat invasive aspergillosis, it has been shown to exhibit some antiviral activity, specifically as a cholesterol transport inhibitor, and was effective in a feline coronavirus model [88]. In addition, its novel oral SUBA formulation has great bioavailability [89], and itraconazole may therefore be an alternative option for treating COVID-19 associated IPA, although it shares the problem of drug–drug interactions with other triazoles. While currently available echinocandins are not considered first-line treatment options for invasive aspergillosis due to their limited antifungal activity against Aspergillus spp., they are generally well tolerated with limited drug–drug interactions and show at least fungistatic activity against Aspergillus hyphae [90]. Furthermore, they synergistic interactions with some other antifungals, making them an excellent choice for combination antifungal therapy [90]. New antifungal classes currently under development, namely fosmanogepix and olorofim [91], may have equal efficacy without the same burden of drug–drug interactions and toxicity, and may therefore overcome the limitations of currently available antifungals and become the preferred treatment options in the near future. If the reported high incidence of COVID-19 associated IPA in ICU patients is confirmed in larger studies, there may be justification for prophylaxis trials, for which not only triazoles and nebulized liposomal amphotericin B [52], but also another novel antifungal currently under development, rezafungin (i.e., once weekly echinocandin with improved activity against Aspergillus spp.), may be a candidate [92].
|
|
sec
|
7. The Current Challenges and How to Tackle Them
Bacterial, fungal and viral secondary infections or co-infections affect mortality. Acinetobacter baumanii, Klebsiella pneumonia and Aspergillus species are important nosocomial pathogens [93] complicating the disease course. Studies from France [51], Germany [50], Belgium [52], and the Netherlands [47], underline the role of CAPA. Diagnosing co-infections is complex and rapid diagnosis plays a crucial role in this setting [49]. Close monitoring for infection development is needed, as well as longitudinal sampling throughout the disease course using culture dependent and independent techniques. Aspergillus antigen and PCR testing of respiratory fluids should be a routine procedure for critically ill patients [94], specifically for those suffering from ARDS [50]. Co-infection with human metapneumovirus has been reported in two of five cases in the German CAPA series [50]. It is unknown whether hospitals caring for COVID-19 test comprehensive respiratory pathogen panels, and to date no analysis of mixed viral infection in COVID-19 patients has been reported. In the context of COVID-19, mixed viral infection may be misinterpreted as presence of innocent bystanders and thus remain underreported. With bronchoalveolar lavage and autopsy regarded as high-risk procedures, key diagnostic instruments are lacking. Autopsy studies are key to understanding pathophysiology of COVID-19 [95] and are critically enlighten interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and different pathogens. With availability of lower respiratory samples, normally obtained by BALF, the quality of microbiological and virological work up would be greatly improved. Inspection of trachea and bronchi is achieved by bronchoscopy, which is critical to find possible Aspergillus tracheobronchitis. Thus, physicians face the dilemma of taking the hazard of aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2, risking transmission versus the endeavor of facilitating the optimal diagnosis and treatment to the patients entrusted to their care.
To this day, our understanding of the true impact of Aspergillus co-infections remains frustratingly limited. Therefore, guidance on proper management of these high-risk procedures to prevent transmission and super spreading of SARS-CoV-2 is needed. The European Confederation of Medical Mycology initiated national multicenter studies aiming to explore the risk of fungal infections during COVID-19 [94] and is currently working on diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Key goals are to improve the outcome by avoiding misdiagnosis and by initiation of early and targeted antifungal treatment.
|
|
title
|
7. The Current Challenges and How to Tackle Them
|
|
p
|
Bacterial, fungal and viral secondary infections or co-infections affect mortality. Acinetobacter baumanii, Klebsiella pneumonia and Aspergillus species are important nosocomial pathogens [93] complicating the disease course. Studies from France [51], Germany [50], Belgium [52], and the Netherlands [47], underline the role of CAPA. Diagnosing co-infections is complex and rapid diagnosis plays a crucial role in this setting [49]. Close monitoring for infection development is needed, as well as longitudinal sampling throughout the disease course using culture dependent and independent techniques. Aspergillus antigen and PCR testing of respiratory fluids should be a routine procedure for critically ill patients [94], specifically for those suffering from ARDS [50]. Co-infection with human metapneumovirus has been reported in two of five cases in the German CAPA series [50]. It is unknown whether hospitals caring for COVID-19 test comprehensive respiratory pathogen panels, and to date no analysis of mixed viral infection in COVID-19 patients has been reported. In the context of COVID-19, mixed viral infection may be misinterpreted as presence of innocent bystanders and thus remain underreported. With bronchoalveolar lavage and autopsy regarded as high-risk procedures, key diagnostic instruments are lacking. Autopsy studies are key to understanding pathophysiology of COVID-19 [95] and are critically enlighten interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and different pathogens. With availability of lower respiratory samples, normally obtained by BALF, the quality of microbiological and virological work up would be greatly improved. Inspection of trachea and bronchi is achieved by bronchoscopy, which is critical to find possible Aspergillus tracheobronchitis. Thus, physicians face the dilemma of taking the hazard of aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2, risking transmission versus the endeavor of facilitating the optimal diagnosis and treatment to the patients entrusted to their care.
|
|
p
|
To this day, our understanding of the true impact of Aspergillus co-infections remains frustratingly limited. Therefore, guidance on proper management of these high-risk procedures to prevent transmission and super spreading of SARS-CoV-2 is needed. The European Confederation of Medical Mycology initiated national multicenter studies aiming to explore the risk of fungal infections during COVID-19 [94] and is currently working on diagnostic and treatment algorithms. Key goals are to improve the outcome by avoiding misdiagnosis and by initiation of early and targeted antifungal treatment.
|
|
sec
|
8. Future Perspectives
We anticipate that autopsies of COVID-19 fatalities will increase and likely prove the clinical relevance of CAPA [96]. Immune dysregulation together with epithelial lung damage stemming from COVID-19 immunopathology is a likely mechanism predisposing for IPA development [97]. IPA will be recognized as important co-infection in patients with severe COVID-19, but incidence will likely vary between different ICU settings. In settings where COVID-19 associated IPA occurs most commonly, screening for IPA in blood and true BALF samples (i.e., obtained via bronchoscopy) will be implemented followed by preemptive treatment in those with mycological evidence of IPA. In other high-incidence settings, clinical antifungal prophylaxis trials will be conducted among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU aiming to show a decrease in putative [4] and proven IPA cases, as well as overall mortality. Treatment trials will compare efficacy and safety of new antifungal drugs currently under development with established antifungals, initiating a new era of antifungal treatment.
|
|
title
|
8. Future Perspectives
|
|
p
|
We anticipate that autopsies of COVID-19 fatalities will increase and likely prove the clinical relevance of CAPA [96]. Immune dysregulation together with epithelial lung damage stemming from COVID-19 immunopathology is a likely mechanism predisposing for IPA development [97]. IPA will be recognized as important co-infection in patients with severe COVID-19, but incidence will likely vary between different ICU settings. In settings where COVID-19 associated IPA occurs most commonly, screening for IPA in blood and true BALF samples (i.e., obtained via bronchoscopy) will be implemented followed by preemptive treatment in those with mycological evidence of IPA. In other high-incidence settings, clinical antifungal prophylaxis trials will be conducted among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU aiming to show a decrease in putative [4] and proven IPA cases, as well as overall mortality. Treatment trials will compare efficacy and safety of new antifungal drugs currently under development with established antifungals, initiating a new era of antifungal treatment.
|
|
back
|
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.H., A.A., and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., A.C., M.H., F.L.v.d.V., J.D.J., C.L.-F., P.K., O.A.C., D.S.P., R.K.; writing—review and editing, M.H., A.A., A.C., F.L.v.d.V., J.D.J., C.L.-F., P.K., O.A.C., D.S.P., R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
AC was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (CEECIND/03628/2017, UIDB/50026/2020 and UIDP/50026/2020), and the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013 and NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023). This research received no other external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
M.H. received research funding by Gilead and Pfizer. D.S.P. receives research support and/or serves on advisory boards for Amplyx, Cidara, Scynexis, N8 Medical, Merck, Regeneron, and Pfizer. P.K. has received non-financial scientific grants from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, and the Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, and is an adivisor to, or received lecture honoraria from Akademie für Infektionsmedizin e.V., Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GPR Academy Ruesselsheim, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, NOXXON Pharma NV., and University Hospital, LMU Munich outside the submitted work. O.A.C. is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education; is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CECAD, EXC 2030 - 390661388); has received research grants from Actelion, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Cidara, Da Volterra, F2G, Gilead, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medicines Company, MedPace, Melinta Therapeutics, MSD, Pfizer, and Scynexis; is a consultant to Actelion, Allecra Therapeutics, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Biosys UK, Cidara, Da Volterra, Entasis, F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini Ricerche, Roche Diagnostics, MSD, Nabriva Therapeutics, Octapharma, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PSI, Rempex, Scynexis, Seres Therapeutics, Tetraphase, and Vical; and received lecture honoraria from Astellas, Basilea, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana, MSD, and Pfizer.
|
|
notes
|
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.H., A.A., and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., A.C., M.H., F.L.v.d.V., J.D.J., C.L.-F., P.K., O.A.C., D.S.P., R.K.; writing—review and editing, M.H., A.A., A.C., F.L.v.d.V., J.D.J., C.L.-F., P.K., O.A.C., D.S.P., R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
|
|
title
|
Author Contributions
|
|
p
|
Conceptualization, M.H., A.A., and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., A.C., M.H., F.L.v.d.V., J.D.J., C.L.-F., P.K., O.A.C., D.S.P., R.K.; writing—review and editing, M.H., A.A., A.C., F.L.v.d.V., J.D.J., C.L.-F., P.K., O.A.C., D.S.P., R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
|
|
notes
|
Funding
AC was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (CEECIND/03628/2017, UIDB/50026/2020 and UIDP/50026/2020), and the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013 and NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023). This research received no other external funding.
|
|
title
|
Funding
|
|
p
|
AC was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) (CEECIND/03628/2017, UIDB/50026/2020 and UIDP/50026/2020), and the Northern Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000013 and NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000023). This research received no other external funding.
|
|
notes
|
Conflicts of Interest
M.H. received research funding by Gilead and Pfizer. D.S.P. receives research support and/or serves on advisory boards for Amplyx, Cidara, Scynexis, N8 Medical, Merck, Regeneron, and Pfizer. P.K. has received non-financial scientific grants from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, and the Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, and is an adivisor to, or received lecture honoraria from Akademie für Infektionsmedizin e.V., Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GPR Academy Ruesselsheim, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, NOXXON Pharma NV., and University Hospital, LMU Munich outside the submitted work. O.A.C. is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education; is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CECAD, EXC 2030 - 390661388); has received research grants from Actelion, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Cidara, Da Volterra, F2G, Gilead, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medicines Company, MedPace, Melinta Therapeutics, MSD, Pfizer, and Scynexis; is a consultant to Actelion, Allecra Therapeutics, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Biosys UK, Cidara, Da Volterra, Entasis, F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini Ricerche, Roche Diagnostics, MSD, Nabriva Therapeutics, Octapharma, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PSI, Rempex, Scynexis, Seres Therapeutics, Tetraphase, and Vical; and received lecture honoraria from Astellas, Basilea, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana, MSD, and Pfizer.
|
|
title
|
Conflicts of Interest
|
|
p
|
M.H. received research funding by Gilead and Pfizer. D.S.P. receives research support and/or serves on advisory boards for Amplyx, Cidara, Scynexis, N8 Medical, Merck, Regeneron, and Pfizer. P.K. has received non-financial scientific grants from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, and the Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, and is an adivisor to, or received lecture honoraria from Akademie für Infektionsmedizin e.V., Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, GPR Academy Ruesselsheim, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, NOXXON Pharma NV., and University Hospital, LMU Munich outside the submitted work. O.A.C. is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education; is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CECAD, EXC 2030 - 390661388); has received research grants from Actelion, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Cidara, Da Volterra, F2G, Gilead, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Medicines Company, MedPace, Melinta Therapeutics, MSD, Pfizer, and Scynexis; is a consultant to Actelion, Allecra Therapeutics, Amplyx, Astellas, Basilea, Biosys UK, Cidara, Da Volterra, Entasis, F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini Ricerche, Roche Diagnostics, MSD, Nabriva Therapeutics, Octapharma, Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PSI, Rempex, Scynexis, Seres Therapeutics, Tetraphase, and Vical; and received lecture honoraria from Astellas, Basilea, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana, MSD, and Pfizer.
|
|
table-wrap
|
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis published before 10 June 2020.
Country (Prevalence) COHORT [Ref] Age/Sex Underlying Conditions CAPA Classification Local/Systemic Corticosteroid Use GM (ODI)/Serum BDG (pg/mL)/qPCR Species (Voriconazole Susceptibility Pattern) Treatment # Outcome
Germany (5/19; 26.3%)ARDS [50] 62/F Cholecystectomy for cholecystitis, arterial hypertension, obesity with sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia, ex-smoker, COPD (GOLD 2) Putative Inhaled steroids for COPD GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive Aspergillus fumigatus (S) culture from BALF VCZ Died
70/M Vertebral disc prolapse left L4/5, flavectomy and nucleotomy, Ex-smoker Putative No GM Serum = 0.7 GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive A. fumigatus by PCR; negative culture ISA Died
54/M Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, aneurysm coiling right A. vertebralis Putative Intravenous corticosteroid therapy 0.4 mg/kg/d, total of 13 days) GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate CASPO→ VCZ Alive
73/M Arterial hypertension, bullous emphysema, smoker, COPD (GOLD 3), Previous Hepatitis B Putative Inhaled steroids for COPD GM Serum negative qPCR tracheal secretion = Positive A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate VCZ Died
54/F None Putative No GM Serum = 1.3 and 2.7 qPCR tracheal secretion = Negative Negative culture CASPO→ VCZ Alive
France (9/27; 33.3%)ARDS * [51] 53/M Hypertension, obesity, ischemic heart disease Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.13 GM BALF = 0.89 BDG = 523 qPCR = Negative Negative culture None Alive
59/F Hypertension, obesity, diabetes Putative No GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.03 qPCR = Negative A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
69/F Hypertension, obesity Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.04 BDG = 7.8 qPCR BALF = 23.9 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion None Alive
63/F Hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.51GM BALF = 0.15 BDG = 63 Negative culture None Died
43/M Asthma with steroid use history Putative No GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.12 BDG = 7 qPCR = Negative A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
79/M Hypertension Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.02 GM BALF = 0.05 BDG = 23 qPCR BALF = 34.5 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
77/M Hypertension, asthma Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 3.91 BDG = 135 qPCR BALF = 29 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF VCZ Died
75/F Hypertension, diabetes Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 0.36 BDG = 450 qPCR BALF = 31.7 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF CASPO Died
47/M Multiple myeloma with steroid therapy Probable No GM Serum = 0.09 BDG = 14 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion None Died
Netherlands (6/31; 19.4%)ARDS [47] 83/M Cardiomyopathy Possible Prednisolone 0ꞏ13mg/kg/day for 28 dayspre-admission GM Serum = 0.4 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate VCZ + ANID (5/6) L-AmB (1/6) Died
67/M COPD (GOLD 3), Post RTx NSCLC 2014 Possible Prednisolone 0ꞏ37mg/kg/day for 2 dayspre-admission NA A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate Died
75/M COPD (GOLD 2a) Probable No GM BALF = 4.0 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF Died
43/M None Probable No GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 3.8 NA Alive
57/M Bronchial asthma Probable Fluticasone 1ꞏ94 mcg/kg/day for 1 month pre-admission GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 1.6 A. fumigatus. culture from BALF Died
58/M None Possible No NA Aspergillus spp. (S), culture from sputum Alive
Belgium (7/20; 35%)ARDS [52] 86/M Hypercholesterinemia NA No GM serum = 0.1 A. flavus culture from tracheal aspirate None Died
38/M Obesity, hypercholesterinemia Proven No GM serum = 0.3 GM BALF > 2.8 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ, ISA Alive
62/M Diabetes Proven No GM serum = 0.2 GM BALF = 2 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Died
73/M Diabetes, obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia Proven No GM serum= 0.1 GM BALF > 2.8 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Alive
77/M Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, pemphigus foliaceus Proven Yes, ND GM serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 2.79 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Alive
55/M HIV, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia NA No GM serum = 0.80 GM BALF = 0.69 Negative culture VCZ, ISA Died
75/M Acute myeloid leukemia NA No GM BALF = 2.63 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Died
France (1)ARDS [57] 74/M Myelodysplastic syndrome, CD8 + T-cell lymphocytosis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, hypertension, benign prostatic hypertrophy Putative No First GM on tracheal secretion = Negative First qPCR = Positive Second GM tracheal secretion = NA Second qPCR = Positive Direct smear of the second sample = branched septate hyphae A. fumigatus, culture of the second tracheal secretion None Died
France (1/5; 20%)Mixed ICU [58] 80/M Thyroid cancer (patient presented with ARDS) Putative NA No A. flavus, culture from tracheal secretion VCZ→ ISA Died
Italy (1)ARDS [59] 73/M Diabetes, hypertension, obesity, hyperthyroidism, atrial fibrillation Proven No GM Serum = 8.6 qPCR from paraffin block tissue = Positive A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB → ISA Died
Austria (1)ARDS [60] 70/M COPD (GOLD 2), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes with end organ damage, arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, and obesity Putative Inhaled Budesonide (400 mg per day) GM Serum = Negative BDG = Negative LFD Positive from endotracheal aspiration A. fumigatus, culture from endotracheal aspiration VCZ Died
Germany (2)ARDS [61] 80/M Suspected pulmonary fibrosis ND No GM Serum = 1.5 GM BALF = 6.3 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB Died
70/M None ND No GM Serum = Negative GM BALF = 6.1 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB Died
Netherlands (1)ARDS [62] 74/F Polyarthritis, reflux, stopped smoking 20 years ago Putative No GM serum = Persistently < 0.5 GM tracheal aspirate = >3 BDG serum = 1590 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate (R)TR34/L98HICZ = 16µg/mL, VCZ = 2µg/mL, and POSA = 0.5µg/ml VCZ + CASPO→ Oral VCZ→ L-AmB Died
Australia (1) ARDS [63] 66/F Hypertension, osteopenia, ex-smoker (20 pack years) Putative No N/A A. fumigatus culture from tracheal aspirate (3x) VCZ + Therapeutic Drug monitoring Alive
* All serum qPCR remained negative. # All dosages are standard dosages (e.g., VCZ 6 mg/kg bid Day 1, and 4 mg/kg bid starting Day 2) [64]. ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; NA: not applicable; ND: not determined; BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BDG: beta-D-Glucan; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GM; galactomannan; GOLD: global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; ODI: optical density index; RTx: radio therapy; LFD: lateral flow device; qPCR: quantitative real-time PCR; VCZ: voriconazole; ISA: isavuconazole; CASPO: caspofungin; ANID: anidulafungin; L-AmB: liposomal amphotericin B; ICZ: itraconazole; POSA = posaconazole.
|
|
label
|
Table 1
|
|
caption
|
Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis published before 10 June 2020.
|
|
p
|
Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis published before 10 June 2020.
|
|
table
|
Country (Prevalence) COHORT [Ref] Age/Sex Underlying Conditions CAPA Classification Local/Systemic Corticosteroid Use GM (ODI)/Serum BDG (pg/mL)/qPCR Species (Voriconazole Susceptibility Pattern) Treatment # Outcome
Germany (5/19; 26.3%)ARDS [50] 62/F Cholecystectomy for cholecystitis, arterial hypertension, obesity with sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia, ex-smoker, COPD (GOLD 2) Putative Inhaled steroids for COPD GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive Aspergillus fumigatus (S) culture from BALF VCZ Died
70/M Vertebral disc prolapse left L4/5, flavectomy and nucleotomy, Ex-smoker Putative No GM Serum = 0.7 GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive A. fumigatus by PCR; negative culture ISA Died
54/M Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, aneurysm coiling right A. vertebralis Putative Intravenous corticosteroid therapy 0.4 mg/kg/d, total of 13 days) GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate CASPO→ VCZ Alive
73/M Arterial hypertension, bullous emphysema, smoker, COPD (GOLD 3), Previous Hepatitis B Putative Inhaled steroids for COPD GM Serum negative qPCR tracheal secretion = Positive A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate VCZ Died
54/F None Putative No GM Serum = 1.3 and 2.7 qPCR tracheal secretion = Negative Negative culture CASPO→ VCZ Alive
France (9/27; 33.3%)ARDS * [51] 53/M Hypertension, obesity, ischemic heart disease Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.13 GM BALF = 0.89 BDG = 523 qPCR = Negative Negative culture None Alive
59/F Hypertension, obesity, diabetes Putative No GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.03 qPCR = Negative A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
69/F Hypertension, obesity Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.04 BDG = 7.8 qPCR BALF = 23.9 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion None Alive
63/F Hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.51GM BALF = 0.15 BDG = 63 Negative culture None Died
43/M Asthma with steroid use history Putative No GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.12 BDG = 7 qPCR = Negative A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
79/M Hypertension Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.02 GM BALF = 0.05 BDG = 23 qPCR BALF = 34.5 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
77/M Hypertension, asthma Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 3.91 BDG = 135 qPCR BALF = 29 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF VCZ Died
75/F Hypertension, diabetes Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 0.36 BDG = 450 qPCR BALF = 31.7 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF CASPO Died
47/M Multiple myeloma with steroid therapy Probable No GM Serum = 0.09 BDG = 14 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion None Died
Netherlands (6/31; 19.4%)ARDS [47] 83/M Cardiomyopathy Possible Prednisolone 0ꞏ13mg/kg/day for 28 dayspre-admission GM Serum = 0.4 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate VCZ + ANID (5/6) L-AmB (1/6) Died
67/M COPD (GOLD 3), Post RTx NSCLC 2014 Possible Prednisolone 0ꞏ37mg/kg/day for 2 dayspre-admission NA A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate Died
75/M COPD (GOLD 2a) Probable No GM BALF = 4.0 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF Died
43/M None Probable No GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 3.8 NA Alive
57/M Bronchial asthma Probable Fluticasone 1ꞏ94 mcg/kg/day for 1 month pre-admission GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 1.6 A. fumigatus. culture from BALF Died
58/M None Possible No NA Aspergillus spp. (S), culture from sputum Alive
Belgium (7/20; 35%)ARDS [52] 86/M Hypercholesterinemia NA No GM serum = 0.1 A. flavus culture from tracheal aspirate None Died
38/M Obesity, hypercholesterinemia Proven No GM serum = 0.3 GM BALF > 2.8 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ, ISA Alive
62/M Diabetes Proven No GM serum = 0.2 GM BALF = 2 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Died
73/M Diabetes, obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia Proven No GM serum= 0.1 GM BALF > 2.8 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Alive
77/M Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, pemphigus foliaceus Proven Yes, ND GM serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 2.79 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Alive
55/M HIV, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia NA No GM serum = 0.80 GM BALF = 0.69 Negative culture VCZ, ISA Died
75/M Acute myeloid leukemia NA No GM BALF = 2.63 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Died
France (1)ARDS [57] 74/M Myelodysplastic syndrome, CD8 + T-cell lymphocytosis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, hypertension, benign prostatic hypertrophy Putative No First GM on tracheal secretion = Negative First qPCR = Positive Second GM tracheal secretion = NA Second qPCR = Positive Direct smear of the second sample = branched septate hyphae A. fumigatus, culture of the second tracheal secretion None Died
France (1/5; 20%)Mixed ICU [58] 80/M Thyroid cancer (patient presented with ARDS) Putative NA No A. flavus, culture from tracheal secretion VCZ→ ISA Died
Italy (1)ARDS [59] 73/M Diabetes, hypertension, obesity, hyperthyroidism, atrial fibrillation Proven No GM Serum = 8.6 qPCR from paraffin block tissue = Positive A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB → ISA Died
Austria (1)ARDS [60] 70/M COPD (GOLD 2), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes with end organ damage, arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, and obesity Putative Inhaled Budesonide (400 mg per day) GM Serum = Negative BDG = Negative LFD Positive from endotracheal aspiration A. fumigatus, culture from endotracheal aspiration VCZ Died
Germany (2)ARDS [61] 80/M Suspected pulmonary fibrosis ND No GM Serum = 1.5 GM BALF = 6.3 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB Died
70/M None ND No GM Serum = Negative GM BALF = 6.1 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB Died
Netherlands (1)ARDS [62] 74/F Polyarthritis, reflux, stopped smoking 20 years ago Putative No GM serum = Persistently < 0.5 GM tracheal aspirate = >3 BDG serum = 1590 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate (R)TR34/L98HICZ = 16µg/mL, VCZ = 2µg/mL, and POSA = 0.5µg/ml VCZ + CASPO→ Oral VCZ→ L-AmB Died
Australia (1) ARDS [63] 66/F Hypertension, osteopenia, ex-smoker (20 pack years) Putative No N/A A. fumigatus culture from tracheal aspirate (3x) VCZ + Therapeutic Drug monitoring Alive
|
|
tr
|
Country (Prevalence) COHORT [Ref] Age/Sex Underlying Conditions CAPA Classification Local/Systemic Corticosteroid Use GM (ODI)/Serum BDG (pg/mL)/qPCR Species (Voriconazole Susceptibility Pattern) Treatment # Outcome
|
|
th
|
Country (Prevalence) COHORT [Ref]
|
|
th
|
Age/Sex
|
|
th
|
Underlying Conditions
|
|
th
|
CAPA Classification
|
|
th
|
Local/Systemic Corticosteroid Use
|
|
th
|
GM (ODI)/Serum BDG (pg/mL)/qPCR
|
|
th
|
Species (Voriconazole Susceptibility Pattern)
|
|
th
|
Treatment #
|
|
th
|
Outcome
|
|
tr
|
Germany (5/19; 26.3%)ARDS [50] 62/F Cholecystectomy for cholecystitis, arterial hypertension, obesity with sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia, ex-smoker, COPD (GOLD 2) Putative Inhaled steroids for COPD GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive Aspergillus fumigatus (S) culture from BALF VCZ Died
|
|
td
|
Germany (5/19; 26.3%)ARDS [50]
|
|
td
|
62/F
|
|
td
|
Cholecystectomy for cholecystitis, arterial hypertension, obesity with sleep apnea, hypercholesterolemia, ex-smoker, COPD (GOLD 2)
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Inhaled steroids for COPD
|
|
td
|
GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive
|
|
td
|
Aspergillus fumigatus (S) culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
70/M Vertebral disc prolapse left L4/5, flavectomy and nucleotomy, Ex-smoker Putative No GM Serum = 0.7 GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive A. fumigatus by PCR; negative culture ISA Died
|
|
td
|
70/M
|
|
td
|
Vertebral disc prolapse left L4/5, flavectomy and nucleotomy, Ex-smoker
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.7 GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus by PCR; negative culture
|
|
td
|
ISA
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
54/M Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, aneurysm coiling right A. vertebralis Putative Intravenous corticosteroid therapy 0.4 mg/kg/d, total of 13 days) GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate CASPO→ VCZ Alive
|
|
td
|
54/M
|
|
td
|
Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, aneurysm coiling right A. vertebralis
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Intravenous corticosteroid therapy 0.4 mg/kg/d, total of 13 days)
|
|
td
|
GM Serum negative GM BALF> 2.5 qPCR BALF = Positive
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate
|
|
td
|
CASPO→ VCZ
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
73/M Arterial hypertension, bullous emphysema, smoker, COPD (GOLD 3), Previous Hepatitis B Putative Inhaled steroids for COPD GM Serum negative qPCR tracheal secretion = Positive A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate VCZ Died
|
|
td
|
73/M
|
|
td
|
Arterial hypertension, bullous emphysema, smoker, COPD (GOLD 3), Previous Hepatitis B
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Inhaled steroids for COPD
|
|
td
|
GM Serum negative qPCR tracheal secretion = Positive
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus (S) culture from tracheal aspirate
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
54/F None Putative No GM Serum = 1.3 and 2.7 qPCR tracheal secretion = Negative Negative culture CASPO→ VCZ Alive
|
|
td
|
54/F
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 1.3 and 2.7 qPCR tracheal secretion = Negative
|
|
td
|
Negative culture
|
|
td
|
CASPO→ VCZ
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
France (9/27; 33.3%)ARDS * [51] 53/M Hypertension, obesity, ischemic heart disease Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.13 GM BALF = 0.89 BDG = 523 qPCR = Negative Negative culture None Alive
|
|
td
|
France (9/27; 33.3%)ARDS * [51]
|
|
td
|
53/M
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, obesity, ischemic heart disease
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.13 GM BALF = 0.89 BDG = 523 qPCR = Negative
|
|
td
|
Negative culture
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
59/F Hypertension, obesity, diabetes Putative No GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.03 qPCR = Negative A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
|
|
td
|
59/F
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, obesity, diabetes
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.03 qPCR = Negative
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
69/F Hypertension, obesity Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.04 BDG = 7.8 qPCR BALF = 23.9 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion None Alive
|
|
td
|
69/F
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, obesity
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.04 BDG = 7.8 qPCR BALF = 23.9
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
63/F Hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.51GM BALF = 0.15 BDG = 63 Negative culture None Died
|
|
td
|
63/F
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.51GM BALF = 0.15 BDG = 63
|
|
td
|
Negative culture
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
43/M Asthma with steroid use history Putative No GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.12 BDG = 7 qPCR = Negative A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
|
|
td
|
43/M
|
|
td
|
Asthma with steroid use history
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.04 GM BALF = 0.12 BDG = 7 qPCR = Negative
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
79/M Hypertension Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.02 GM BALF = 0.05 BDG = 23 qPCR BALF = 34.5 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF None Alive
|
|
td
|
79/M
|
|
td
|
Hypertension
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.02 GM BALF = 0.05 BDG = 23 qPCR BALF = 34.5
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
77/M Hypertension, asthma Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 3.91 BDG = 135 qPCR BALF = 29 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF VCZ Died
|
|
td
|
77/M
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, asthma
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 3.91 BDG = 135 qPCR BALF = 29
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
75/F Hypertension, diabetes Putative Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10 GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 0.36 BDG = 450 qPCR BALF = 31.7 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF CASPO Died
|
|
td
|
75/F
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, diabetes
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Dexamethasone iv 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, followed by 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.37 GM BALF = 0.36 BDG = 450 qPCR BALF = 31.7
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
CASPO
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
47/M Multiple myeloma with steroid therapy Probable No GM Serum = 0.09 BDG = 14 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion None Died
|
|
td
|
47/M
|
|
td
|
Multiple myeloma with steroid therapy
|
|
td
|
Probable
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.09 BDG = 14
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal secretion
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
Netherlands (6/31; 19.4%)ARDS [47] 83/M Cardiomyopathy Possible Prednisolone 0ꞏ13mg/kg/day for 28 dayspre-admission GM Serum = 0.4 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate VCZ + ANID (5/6) L-AmB (1/6) Died
|
|
td
|
Netherlands (6/31; 19.4%)ARDS [47]
|
|
td
|
83/M
|
|
td
|
Cardiomyopathy
|
|
td
|
Possible
|
|
td
|
Prednisolone 0ꞏ13mg/kg/day for 28 dayspre-admission
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.4
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate
|
|
td
|
VCZ + ANID (5/6) L-AmB (1/6)
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
67/M COPD (GOLD 3), Post RTx NSCLC 2014 Possible Prednisolone 0ꞏ37mg/kg/day for 2 dayspre-admission NA A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate Died
|
|
td
|
67/M
|
|
td
|
COPD (GOLD 3), Post RTx NSCLC 2014
|
|
td
|
Possible
|
|
td
|
Prednisolone 0ꞏ37mg/kg/day for 2 dayspre-admission
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
75/M COPD (GOLD 2a) Probable No GM BALF = 4.0 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF Died
|
|
td
|
75/M
|
|
td
|
COPD (GOLD 2a)
|
|
td
|
Probable
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM BALF = 4.0
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
43/M None Probable No GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 3.8 NA Alive
|
|
td
|
43/M
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Probable
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 3.8
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
57/M Bronchial asthma Probable Fluticasone 1ꞏ94 mcg/kg/day for 1 month pre-admission GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 1.6 A. fumigatus. culture from BALF Died
|
|
td
|
57/M
|
|
td
|
Bronchial asthma
|
|
td
|
Probable
|
|
td
|
Fluticasone 1ꞏ94 mcg/kg/day for 1 month pre-admission
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 1.6
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus. culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
58/M None Possible No NA Aspergillus spp. (S), culture from sputum Alive
|
|
td
|
58/M
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Possible
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
Aspergillus spp. (S), culture from sputum
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
Belgium (7/20; 35%)ARDS [52] 86/M Hypercholesterinemia NA No GM serum = 0.1 A. flavus culture from tracheal aspirate None Died
|
|
td
|
Belgium (7/20; 35%)ARDS [52]
|
|
td
|
86/M
|
|
td
|
Hypercholesterinemia
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM serum = 0.1
|
|
td
|
A. flavus culture from tracheal aspirate
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
38/M Obesity, hypercholesterinemia Proven No GM serum = 0.3 GM BALF > 2.8 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ, ISA Alive
|
|
td
|
38/M
|
|
td
|
Obesity, hypercholesterinemia
|
|
td
|
Proven
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM serum = 0.3 GM BALF > 2.8
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ, ISA
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
62/M Diabetes Proven No GM serum = 0.2 GM BALF = 2 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Died
|
|
td
|
62/M
|
|
td
|
Diabetes
|
|
td
|
Proven
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM serum = 0.2 GM BALF = 2
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
73/M Diabetes, obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia Proven No GM serum= 0.1 GM BALF > 2.8 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Alive
|
|
td
|
73/M
|
|
td
|
Diabetes, obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia
|
|
td
|
Proven
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM serum= 0.1 GM BALF > 2.8
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
77/M Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, pemphigus foliaceus Proven Yes, ND GM serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 2.79 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Alive
|
|
td
|
77/M
|
|
td
|
Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, pemphigus foliaceus
|
|
td
|
Proven
|
|
td
|
Yes, ND
|
|
td
|
GM serum = 0.1 GM BALF = 2.79
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
tr
|
55/M HIV, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia NA No GM serum = 0.80 GM BALF = 0.69 Negative culture VCZ, ISA Died
|
|
td
|
55/M
|
|
td
|
HIV, hypertension, hypercholesterinemia
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM serum = 0.80 GM BALF = 0.69
|
|
td
|
Negative culture
|
|
td
|
VCZ, ISA
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
75/M Acute myeloid leukemia NA No GM BALF = 2.63 A. fumigatus culture from BALF VCZ Died
|
|
td
|
75/M
|
|
td
|
Acute myeloid leukemia
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM BALF = 2.63
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
France (1)ARDS [57] 74/M Myelodysplastic syndrome, CD8 + T-cell lymphocytosis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, hypertension, benign prostatic hypertrophy Putative No First GM on tracheal secretion = Negative First qPCR = Positive Second GM tracheal secretion = NA Second qPCR = Positive Direct smear of the second sample = branched septate hyphae A. fumigatus, culture of the second tracheal secretion None Died
|
|
td
|
France (1)ARDS [57]
|
|
td
|
74/M
|
|
td
|
Myelodysplastic syndrome, CD8 + T-cell lymphocytosis, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, hypertension, benign prostatic hypertrophy
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
First GM on tracheal secretion = Negative First qPCR = Positive Second GM tracheal secretion = NA Second qPCR = Positive Direct smear of the second sample = branched septate hyphae
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture of the second tracheal secretion
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
France (1/5; 20%)Mixed ICU [58] 80/M Thyroid cancer (patient presented with ARDS) Putative NA No A. flavus, culture from tracheal secretion VCZ→ ISA Died
|
|
td
|
France (1/5; 20%)Mixed ICU [58]
|
|
td
|
80/M
|
|
td
|
Thyroid cancer (patient presented with ARDS)
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
NA
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
A. flavus, culture from tracheal secretion
|
|
td
|
VCZ→ ISA
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
Italy (1)ARDS [59] 73/M Diabetes, hypertension, obesity, hyperthyroidism, atrial fibrillation Proven No GM Serum = 8.6 qPCR from paraffin block tissue = Positive A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB → ISA Died
|
|
td
|
Italy (1)ARDS [59]
|
|
td
|
73/M
|
|
td
|
Diabetes, hypertension, obesity, hyperthyroidism, atrial fibrillation
|
|
td
|
Proven
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 8.6 qPCR from paraffin block tissue = Positive
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
L-AmB → ISA
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
Austria (1)ARDS [60] 70/M COPD (GOLD 2), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes with end organ damage, arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, and obesity Putative Inhaled Budesonide (400 mg per day) GM Serum = Negative BDG = Negative LFD Positive from endotracheal aspiration A. fumigatus, culture from endotracheal aspiration VCZ Died
|
|
td
|
Austria (1)ARDS [60]
|
|
td
|
70/M
|
|
td
|
COPD (GOLD 2), obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes with end organ damage, arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, and obesity
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
Inhaled Budesonide (400 mg per day)
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = Negative BDG = Negative LFD Positive from endotracheal aspiration
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from endotracheal aspiration
|
|
td
|
VCZ
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
Germany (2)ARDS [61] 80/M Suspected pulmonary fibrosis ND No GM Serum = 1.5 GM BALF = 6.3 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB Died
|
|
td
|
Germany (2)ARDS [61]
|
|
td
|
80/M
|
|
td
|
Suspected pulmonary fibrosis
|
|
td
|
ND
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = 1.5 GM BALF = 6.3
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
L-AmB
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
70/M None ND No GM Serum = Negative GM BALF = 6.1 A. fumigatus, culture from BALF L-AmB Died
|
|
td
|
70/M
|
|
td
|
None
|
|
td
|
ND
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM Serum = Negative GM BALF = 6.1
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from BALF
|
|
td
|
L-AmB
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
Netherlands (1)ARDS [62] 74/F Polyarthritis, reflux, stopped smoking 20 years ago Putative No GM serum = Persistently < 0.5 GM tracheal aspirate = >3 BDG serum = 1590 A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate (R)TR34/L98HICZ = 16µg/mL, VCZ = 2µg/mL, and POSA = 0.5µg/ml VCZ + CASPO→ Oral VCZ→ L-AmB Died
|
|
td
|
Netherlands (1)ARDS [62]
|
|
td
|
74/F
|
|
td
|
Polyarthritis, reflux, stopped smoking 20 years ago
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
GM serum = Persistently < 0.5 GM tracheal aspirate = >3 BDG serum = 1590
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus, culture from tracheal aspirate (R)TR34/L98HICZ = 16µg/mL, VCZ = 2µg/mL, and POSA = 0.5µg/ml
|
|
td
|
VCZ + CASPO→ Oral VCZ→ L-AmB
|
|
td
|
Died
|
|
tr
|
Australia (1) ARDS [63] 66/F Hypertension, osteopenia, ex-smoker (20 pack years) Putative No N/A A. fumigatus culture from tracheal aspirate (3x) VCZ + Therapeutic Drug monitoring Alive
|
|
td
|
Australia (1) ARDS [63]
|
|
td
|
66/F
|
|
td
|
Hypertension, osteopenia, ex-smoker (20 pack years)
|
|
td
|
Putative
|
|
td
|
No
|
|
td
|
N/A
|
|
td
|
A. fumigatus culture from tracheal aspirate (3x)
|
|
td
|
VCZ + Therapeutic Drug monitoring
|
|
td
|
Alive
|
|
table-wrap-foot
|
* All serum qPCR remained negative. # All dosages are standard dosages (e.g., VCZ 6 mg/kg bid Day 1, and 4 mg/kg bid starting Day 2) [64]. ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; NA: not applicable; ND: not determined; BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BDG: beta-D-Glucan; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GM; galactomannan; GOLD: global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; ODI: optical density index; RTx: radio therapy; LFD: lateral flow device; qPCR: quantitative real-time PCR; VCZ: voriconazole; ISA: isavuconazole; CASPO: caspofungin; ANID: anidulafungin; L-AmB: liposomal amphotericin B; ICZ: itraconazole; POSA = posaconazole.
|
|
footnote
|
* All serum qPCR remained negative. # All dosages are standard dosages (e.g., VCZ 6 mg/kg bid Day 1, and 4 mg/kg bid starting Day 2) [64]. ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; NA: not applicable; ND: not determined; BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BDG: beta-D-Glucan; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GM; galactomannan; GOLD: global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; ODI: optical density index; RTx: radio therapy; LFD: lateral flow device; qPCR: quantitative real-time PCR; VCZ: voriconazole; ISA: isavuconazole; CASPO: caspofungin; ANID: anidulafungin; L-AmB: liposomal amphotericin B; ICZ: itraconazole; POSA = posaconazole.
|
|
p
|
* All serum qPCR remained negative. # All dosages are standard dosages (e.g., VCZ 6 mg/kg bid Day 1, and 4 mg/kg bid starting Day 2) [64]. ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; NA: not applicable; ND: not determined; BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BDG: beta-D-Glucan; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GM; galactomannan; GOLD: global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease; NSCLC: non-small-cell lung cancer; ODI: optical density index; RTx: radio therapy; LFD: lateral flow device; qPCR: quantitative real-time PCR; VCZ: voriconazole; ISA: isavuconazole; CASPO: caspofungin; ANID: anidulafungin; L-AmB: liposomal amphotericin B; ICZ: itraconazole; POSA = posaconazole.
|
