PubMed:29587633 / 1169-1735 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

GoldHamster

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T71 44-47 1799649 denotes SPs
T67 44-47 CVCL_R927 denotes SPs
T66 44-47 PR:P49903 denotes SPs
T70 44-47 PR:000014643 denotes SPs
T73 44-47 PR:Q8S948 denotes SPs
T68 44-47 GO:0046524 denotes SPs
T69 44-47 D016750 denotes SPs
T72 44-47 C535540 denotes SPs
T74 246-254 CHEBI:36080 denotes proteins
T75 292-295 CHEBI:85361 denotes TMs
T77 451-468 D004272 denotes mitochondrial DNA
T78 451-468 SO:0001032 denotes mitochondrial DNA
T76 451-468 GO:0000262 denotes mitochondrial DNA
T83 499-505 37565 denotes tandem
T84 499-505 SO:0001513 denotes tandem
T86 560-565 D004272 denotes mtDNA
T87 560-565 SO:0001032 denotes mtDNA
T85 560-565 GO:0000262 denotes mtDNA

PubMed_Structured_Abstracts

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T2 0-566 RESULTS denotes In silico analyses suggests the presence of SPs and SCSs and provides some insight into possible function(s) of these novel ORFs. The assessed confidence in these structures and functions was highly variable, possibly due to the novelty of these proteins. The number and topology of putative TMs appear to be maintained among both F- and H-ORFs, however, this is not the case for M-ORFs. There does not appear to be a typical control region in H-type mitochondrial DNA, especially given the loss of tandem repeats in unassigned regions when compared to F-type mtDNA.

Goldhamster2_Cellosaurus

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T9 44-47 CVCL_4920|Spontaneously_immortalized_cell_line|Sus scrofa denotes SPs
T10 44-47 CVCL_R927|Spontaneously_immortalized_cell_line|Lateolabrax japonicus denotes SPs
T11 416-417 CVCL_6479|Finite_cell_line|Mus musculus denotes a