PMC:7797241 / 22148-23153 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"211","span":{"begin":480,"end":485},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"212","span":{"begin":389,"end":394},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"213","span":{"begin":311,"end":319},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A211","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"211","obj":"Gene:23741"},{"id":"A212","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"212","obj":"Gene:163126"},{"id":"A213","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"213","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Estimating the reproduction number under interventions\nFigure 4 shows the model prediction for the reproduction (‘R’) number over time until 11 May 2020, when lockdown measures were relaxed. All interventions (social distancing, school closures/lockdown) had a significant impact on the reproductive number for COVID-19 in the SW. We predict that prior to any interventions R was 2.6 (95% CrI 2.0 to 3.2), and the introduction of social distancing reduced this number to 2.3 (95% CrI 1.8 to 2.9). At the minimum, R was 0.6 (95% CrI 0.5 to 0.7) after all prior interventions were enacted and adhered to (social distancing, school closures and lockdown).\nFigure 4 The effect of interventions on estimates of R (y-axis) over time until 11 May 2020. Additional results for the fitting performance of the model (online supplemental figure S2A, B and table S2), the performance based on prior data (online supplemental figure S3A–D) and sensitivity analysis can be found in the online supplemental information."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T149","span":{"begin":0,"end":54},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T150","span":{"begin":55,"end":190},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T151","span":{"begin":191,"end":330},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T152","span":{"begin":331,"end":496},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T153","span":{"begin":497,"end":652},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T154","span":{"begin":653,"end":746},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T155","span":{"begin":747,"end":1005},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Estimating the reproduction number under interventions\nFigure 4 shows the model prediction for the reproduction (‘R’) number over time until 11 May 2020, when lockdown measures were relaxed. All interventions (social distancing, school closures/lockdown) had a significant impact on the reproductive number for COVID-19 in the SW. We predict that prior to any interventions R was 2.6 (95% CrI 2.0 to 3.2), and the introduction of social distancing reduced this number to 2.3 (95% CrI 1.8 to 2.9). At the minimum, R was 0.6 (95% CrI 0.5 to 0.7) after all prior interventions were enacted and adhered to (social distancing, school closures and lockdown).\nFigure 4 The effect of interventions on estimates of R (y-axis) over time until 11 May 2020. Additional results for the fitting performance of the model (online supplemental figure S2A, B and table S2), the performance based on prior data (online supplemental figure S3A–D) and sensitivity analysis can be found in the online supplemental information."}