PMC:7796291 / 18679-20106 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"194","span":{"begin":45,"end":52},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"195","span":{"begin":175,"end":180},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"196","span":{"begin":227,"end":240},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"197","span":{"begin":280,"end":285},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"198","span":{"begin":331,"end":335},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"199","span":{"begin":768,"end":772},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"200","span":{"begin":776,"end":779},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"201","span":{"begin":923,"end":926},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A194","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"194","obj":"MESH:D000438"},{"id":"A195","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"195","obj":"MESH:D014867"},{"id":"A196","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"196","obj":"MESH:D011126"},{"id":"A197","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"197","obj":"MESH:D014867"},{"id":"A198","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"198","obj":"MESH:D000431"},{"id":"A199","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"199","obj":"MESH:D000431"},{"id":"A200","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"200","obj":"MESH:D019840"},{"id":"A201","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"201","obj":"MESH:D006997"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"The charge decay occurred by the exposure to alcohol and detergent solution was probably due to the mobility of the charge carrier caused by the penetration of liquid [9,24]. Water has high surface tension and does not wet the polypropylene (PP) surface; therefore, the effect of water-immersion on PP media is negligible. IPA and EtOH immediately wetted the PP media in each layer as represented by the contact angle ~0° (Figure 4); and penetration of solvents into PP molecules expedited the charge carrier mobility, quickly dissipating the charges. In the case of 0.1% detergent solution, instantaneous contact angle was around 120°, then within 30~60 s, the PP web fully absorbed the liquid droplets. As the affinity of detergent solution to PP was not as high as EtOH or IPA, the impact of detergent on the electrostatic filtration was not as significant as that of organic solvents. Unlike the other test liquid, the ClO− droplet maintained the contact angle of 140° without spreading, and the electrostatic filtration was hardly affected (Figure 2). Among the treatments, detergent treatment reduced the contact angle; this increased surface wettability of filter web would adversely influence the charge retention by increasing the electric conductivity, as evidenced from the surface potential measurement in Figure 3. As a result, the filtration performance after detergent treatment significantly decreased (≥10.8%)."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T156","span":{"begin":0,"end":174},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T157","span":{"begin":175,"end":322},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T158","span":{"begin":323,"end":551},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T159","span":{"begin":552,"end":704},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T160","span":{"begin":705,"end":888},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T161","span":{"begin":889,"end":1056},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T162","span":{"begin":1057,"end":1327},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T163","span":{"begin":1328,"end":1427},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"The charge decay occurred by the exposure to alcohol and detergent solution was probably due to the mobility of the charge carrier caused by the penetration of liquid [9,24]. Water has high surface tension and does not wet the polypropylene (PP) surface; therefore, the effect of water-immersion on PP media is negligible. IPA and EtOH immediately wetted the PP media in each layer as represented by the contact angle ~0° (Figure 4); and penetration of solvents into PP molecules expedited the charge carrier mobility, quickly dissipating the charges. In the case of 0.1% detergent solution, instantaneous contact angle was around 120°, then within 30~60 s, the PP web fully absorbed the liquid droplets. As the affinity of detergent solution to PP was not as high as EtOH or IPA, the impact of detergent on the electrostatic filtration was not as significant as that of organic solvents. Unlike the other test liquid, the ClO− droplet maintained the contact angle of 140° without spreading, and the electrostatic filtration was hardly affected (Figure 2). Among the treatments, detergent treatment reduced the contact angle; this increased surface wettability of filter web would adversely influence the charge retention by increasing the electric conductivity, as evidenced from the surface potential measurement in Figure 3. As a result, the filtration performance after detergent treatment significantly decreased (≥10.8%)."}