> top > docs > PMC:7784824 > spans > 2772-3787 > annotations

PMC:7784824 / 2772-3787 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

LitCovid-PD-HP

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue hp_id
T2 907-916 Phenotype denotes pneumonia http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0002090

LitCovid-PubTator

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue tao:has_database_id
52 218-228 Species denotes SARS-CoV-2 Tax:2697049
53 871-879 Species denotes patients Tax:9606
54 708-717 Disease denotes infection MESH:D007239
55 898-916 Disease denotes COVID-19 pneumonia MESH:C000657245

LitCovid-sentences

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T34 0-170 Sentence denotes Considering the extent of the pandemic, its socio-economic impact, and the effect on healthcare systems worldwide, there is a high need to extend the diagnostic capacity.
T35 171-346 Sentence denotes So far, the gold standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, implemented at the start of the outbreak, is real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [6].
T36 347-497 Sentence denotes In contrast with a high specificity up to 98.8% [7], RT-PCR suffers from a rather long turnaround time when performed in batch testing (2 to 6 hours).
T37 498-575 Sentence denotes Continuous PCR testing has a faster turnaround time (1 u) but a low capacity.
T38 576-738 Sentence denotes False negative results in both the very early as well as the late phase of the disease due to low virus shedding at these stages of infection are reported [8–10].
T39 739-844 Sentence denotes Studies have shown discrepant results between RT-PCR and chest computed tomography (CT) findings [11,12].
T40 845-1015 Sentence denotes CT imaging findings in 30 patients with suspicion of COVID-19 pneumonia were shown to have a sensitivity of 97.2% compared to 83.3% of initial nasopharyngeal RT-PCR [13].