> top > docs > PMC:7594251 > spans > 67805-68815 > annotations

PMC:7594251 / 67805-68815 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue fma_id
T33707 166-169 Body_part denotes A2A http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68761
T71880 197-204 Body_part denotes protein http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67257

LitCovid-PD-MONDO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue mondo_id
T71 241-260 Disease denotes Parkinson’s disease http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005180

LitCovid-PD-CLO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T483 0-1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes A
T484 206-207 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T485 364-365 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a

LitCovid-PD-CHEBI

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue chebi_id
T98132 170-179 Chemical denotes adenosine http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_16335
T197 197-204 Chemical denotes protein http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_36080
T99382 208-212 Chemical denotes drug http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_23888
T199 351-360 Chemical denotes molecules http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_25367
T21421 550-557 Chemical denotes ligands http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_52214
T2344 874-881 Chemical denotes ligands http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_52214
T31331 988-992 Chemical denotes drug http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_23888

LitCovid-PubTator

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue tao:has_database_id
666 170-179 Chemical denotes adenosine MESH:D000241
667 241-260 Disease denotes Parkinson’s disease MESH:D010300

LitCovid-sentences

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T461 0-267 Sentence denotes A prime example of the complementarity between NMR screening and virtual docking is found in the work of Chen et al. [331], in which the authors sought to target the A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR) protein, a drug target for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease [332].
T462 268-433 Sentence denotes They used virtual screening and an NMR-based screening method against the same 500 molecules in a fragment library so they could compare the results of both methods.
T463 434-705 Sentence denotes The virtual screen successfully predicted (based on calculated binding affinities) four out of the five orthosteric ligands discovered by NMR that were within the top 5% of the fragment library, showing that the two separate methods can give similar and reliable results.
T464 706-1010 Sentence denotes Later on, Chen et al. discovered that virtual screening picked up three additional fragments that remained undetected by the NMR-based method, and were, in fact, A2AAR ligands; this shows that though neither method is flawless, they are still perfectly complementary approaches for drug design [322,331].