PMC:7558333 / 2270-2574 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":201,"end":209},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A19","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T19","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":" [3]. This classification is considered as robust because it has been evaluated in patients for whom autopsy results were available, but it is quite awkward to use in routine practice, particularly in COVID-19 patients with clinical and CT-scan signs hard to interpret [4]. Besides, it does not include m"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":61,"end":64},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"}],"text":" [3]. This classification is considered as robust because it has been evaluated in patients for whom autopsy results were available, but it is quite awkward to use in routine practice, particularly in COVID-19 patients with clinical and CT-scan signs hard to interpret [4]. Besides, it does not include m"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T22","span":{"begin":6,"end":273},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":" [3]. This classification is considered as robust because it has been evaluated in patients for whom autopsy results were available, but it is quite awkward to use in routine practice, particularly in COVID-19 patients with clinical and CT-scan signs hard to interpret [4]. Besides, it does not include m"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"53","span":{"begin":83,"end":91},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"54","span":{"begin":210,"end":218},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"59","span":{"begin":201,"end":209},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A53","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"53","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A54","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"54","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A59","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"59","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":" [3]. This classification is considered as robust because it has been evaluated in patients for whom autopsy results were available, but it is quite awkward to use in routine practice, particularly in COVID-19 patients with clinical and CT-scan signs hard to interpret [4]. Besides, it does not include m"}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32664423-22517788-60101693","span":{"begin":2,"end":3},"obj":"22517788"},{"id":"32664423-28954783-60101694","span":{"begin":270,"end":271},"obj":"28954783"}],"text":" [3]. This classification is considered as robust because it has been evaluated in patients for whom autopsy results were available, but it is quite awkward to use in routine practice, particularly in COVID-19 patients with clinical and CT-scan signs hard to interpret [4]. Besides, it does not include m"}