PMC:7529504 / 12074-12382 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T54","span":{"begin":297,"end":303},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A54","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T54","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0004992"}],"text":"ual level of care, and more than half (55.34%) of the reduction was a precautionary measure; however, in many cases, the disruption was due to other causes, such as an overwhelmed system (19.94%), staff shortage (17.98%), and lack of access to medications (9.83%; Table 2).\nTABLE 2 Disruption of Cancer Care"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T52","span":{"begin":68,"end":69},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"}],"text":"ual level of care, and more than half (55.34%) of the reduction was a precautionary measure; however, in many cases, the disruption was due to other causes, such as an overwhelmed system (19.94%), staff shortage (17.98%), and lack of access to medications (9.83%; Table 2).\nTABLE 2 Disruption of Cancer Care"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"185","span":{"begin":297,"end":303},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A185","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"185","obj":"MESH:D009369"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"ual level of care, and more than half (55.34%) of the reduction was a precautionary measure; however, in many cases, the disruption was due to other causes, such as an overwhelmed system (19.94%), staff shortage (17.98%), and lack of access to medications (9.83%; Table 2).\nTABLE 2 Disruption of Cancer Care"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T47","span":{"begin":297,"end":303},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A47","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T47","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0002664"}],"text":"ual level of care, and more than half (55.34%) of the reduction was a precautionary measure; however, in many cases, the disruption was due to other causes, such as an overwhelmed system (19.94%), staff shortage (17.98%), and lack of access to medications (9.83%; Table 2).\nTABLE 2 Disruption of Cancer Care"}