PMC:7454258 / 92031-93546 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T468","span":{"begin":159,"end":161},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0053733"},{"id":"T469","span":{"begin":431,"end":432},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T470","span":{"begin":548,"end":551},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001003"},{"id":"T471","span":{"begin":748,"end":751},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001003"},{"id":"T472","span":{"begin":771,"end":774},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"},{"id":"T473","span":{"begin":775,"end":776},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T474","span":{"begin":786,"end":791},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0009985"},{"id":"T475","span":{"begin":853,"end":854},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"}],"text":"Notably, the Roadmap did not include any data, findings, or recommendations on current or new nutrition research investment levels, leadership, or structures (11). Thus, the Roadmap lacked any prioritization between the 120 identified initiatives, due to variable and nonharmonized funding criteria, priorities, and capacities across federal, nonprofit, and private-sector research agencies in the US and globally. This may be why a 2017 analysis found only early signs of implementation of the Roadmap among ICHNR member departments and agencies (163). ICHNR recognized that further engagement with the extramural scientific community and leveraging existing or new public–private partnerships would be important to achieving the Roadmap's goals (163). Currently, ICHNR has a narrower focus, meeting about twice per year to discuss the DGAs, DRIs, and a potential new federal database of nutrition research projects. There are few other indicators of current use or monitoring of the Roadmap's aims or progress (164). Although ICHNR is the current major entity charged with improving coordination among federal departments and agencies engaged in nutrition research (164), several structural challenges have limited its impact. These include lack of any strong or consistent connection to the White House, no specific budget appropriations, no mechanism for reporting to Congress, and absence of any well-supported infrastructure for external advisory input on cross-governmental strategies for nutrition research."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T489","span":{"begin":0,"end":163},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T490","span":{"begin":164,"end":414},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T491","span":{"begin":415,"end":553},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T492","span":{"begin":554,"end":753},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T493","span":{"begin":754,"end":917},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T494","span":{"begin":918,"end":1018},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T495","span":{"begin":1019,"end":1228},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T496","span":{"begin":1229,"end":1515},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Notably, the Roadmap did not include any data, findings, or recommendations on current or new nutrition research investment levels, leadership, or structures (11). Thus, the Roadmap lacked any prioritization between the 120 identified initiatives, due to variable and nonharmonized funding criteria, priorities, and capacities across federal, nonprofit, and private-sector research agencies in the US and globally. This may be why a 2017 analysis found only early signs of implementation of the Roadmap among ICHNR member departments and agencies (163). ICHNR recognized that further engagement with the extramural scientific community and leveraging existing or new public–private partnerships would be important to achieving the Roadmap's goals (163). Currently, ICHNR has a narrower focus, meeting about twice per year to discuss the DGAs, DRIs, and a potential new federal database of nutrition research projects. There are few other indicators of current use or monitoring of the Roadmap's aims or progress (164). Although ICHNR is the current major entity charged with improving coordination among federal departments and agencies engaged in nutrition research (164), several structural challenges have limited its impact. These include lack of any strong or consistent connection to the White House, no specific budget appropriations, no mechanism for reporting to Congress, and absence of any well-supported infrastructure for external advisory input on cross-governmental strategies for nutrition research."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32687145-28814532-2017883","span":{"begin":548,"end":551},"obj":"28814532"},{"id":"32687145-28814532-2017884","span":{"begin":748,"end":751},"obj":"28814532"}],"text":"Notably, the Roadmap did not include any data, findings, or recommendations on current or new nutrition research investment levels, leadership, or structures (11). Thus, the Roadmap lacked any prioritization between the 120 identified initiatives, due to variable and nonharmonized funding criteria, priorities, and capacities across federal, nonprofit, and private-sector research agencies in the US and globally. This may be why a 2017 analysis found only early signs of implementation of the Roadmap among ICHNR member departments and agencies (163). ICHNR recognized that further engagement with the extramural scientific community and leveraging existing or new public–private partnerships would be important to achieving the Roadmap's goals (163). Currently, ICHNR has a narrower focus, meeting about twice per year to discuss the DGAs, DRIs, and a potential new federal database of nutrition research projects. There are few other indicators of current use or monitoring of the Roadmap's aims or progress (164). Although ICHNR is the current major entity charged with improving coordination among federal departments and agencies engaged in nutrition research (164), several structural challenges have limited its impact. These include lack of any strong or consistent connection to the White House, no specific budget appropriations, no mechanism for reporting to Congress, and absence of any well-supported infrastructure for external advisory input on cross-governmental strategies for nutrition research."}