PMC:7341464 / 6893-7125 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    LitCovid-PD-CLO

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T57","span":{"begin":97,"end":103},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T58","span":{"begin":130,"end":132},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001022"},{"id":"T59","span":{"begin":130,"end":132},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0007314"},{"id":"T60","span":{"begin":168,"end":169},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"}],"text":"ohort of housemates of similar age and geographical spreading as the patients, of whom none were tested positive (0%). Similar to Li et al. (0.9% vs 0.1%), we did find a slightly higher percentage of infected patients than in the ge"}

    LitCovid-PD-CHEBI

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T8","span":{"begin":130,"end":132},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A8","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T8","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_30145"}],"text":"ohort of housemates of similar age and geographical spreading as the patients, of whom none were tested positive (0%). Similar to Li et al. (0.9% vs 0.1%), we did find a slightly higher percentage of infected patients than in the ge"}

    LitCovid-PubTator

    {"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"175","span":{"begin":69,"end":77},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"176","span":{"begin":209,"end":217},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"182","span":{"begin":200,"end":208},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A175","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"175","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A176","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"176","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A182","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"182","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"ohort of housemates of similar age and geographical spreading as the patients, of whom none were tested positive (0%). Similar to Li et al. (0.9% vs 0.1%), we did find a slightly higher percentage of infected patients than in the ge"}