PMC:7321036 / 6047-6624 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PMC-OGER-BB","denotations":[{"id":"T141","span":{"begin":89,"end":99},"obj":"SP_7"},{"id":"T142","span":{"begin":204,"end":214},"obj":"SP_7"},{"id":"T143","span":{"begin":501,"end":512},"obj":"NCBITaxon:60711"},{"id":"T144","span":{"begin":513,"end":520},"obj":"NCBITaxon:9606"},{"id":"T145","span":{"begin":525,"end":530},"obj":"SP_6;NCBITaxon:9606"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T98643","span":{"begin":28,"end":32},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T3823","span":{"begin":135,"end":140},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T73925","span":{"begin":434,"end":441},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T29258","span":{"begin":531,"end":538},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A95665","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T98643","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68646"},{"id":"A38751","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T3823","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma68646"},{"id":"A95956","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T73925","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67257"},{"id":"A81333","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T29258","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma67257"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T54","span":{"begin":89,"end":97},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T55","span":{"begin":100,"end":109},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T56","span":{"begin":204,"end":212},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T57","span":{"begin":215,"end":224},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T58","span":{"begin":265,"end":274},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T59","span":{"begin":340,"end":343},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A54","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T54","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A55","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T55","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A56","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T56","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A57","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T57","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A58","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T58","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005550"},{"id":"A59","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T59","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0022963"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T65668","span":{"begin":28,"end":37},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0000031"},{"id":"T47731","span":{"begin":135,"end":140},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0005623"},{"id":"T96407","span":{"begin":232,"end":236},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001382"},{"id":"T17213","span":{"begin":298,"end":299},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T84745","span":{"begin":308,"end":309},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T21057","span":{"begin":496,"end":498},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050050"},{"id":"T22948","span":{"begin":525,"end":538},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PR_000029067"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":434,"end":441},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":531,"end":538},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A25","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T25","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_36080"},{"id":"A26","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T26","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_36080"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-GO-BP","denotations":[{"id":"T44285","span":{"begin":455,"end":470},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0016310"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"193","span":{"begin":501,"end":520},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"194","span":{"begin":525,"end":530},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"196","span":{"begin":89,"end":109},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"197","span":{"begin":204,"end":224},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"198","span":{"begin":265,"end":274},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A193","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"193","obj":"Tax:60711"},{"id":"A194","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"194","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A196","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"196","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A197","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"197","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A198","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"198","obj":"MESH:D007239"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T38","span":{"begin":23,"end":134},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T39","span":{"begin":135,"end":301},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T40","span":{"begin":302,"end":500},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32645325-25267831-20773042","span":{"begin":16,"end":20},"obj":"25267831"},{"id":"32645325-32160149-20773043","span":{"begin":128,"end":132},"obj":"32160149"}],"text":" (Osada et al., 2014). This cell line was selected because of its high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (Harcourt et al., 2020). Cells were harvested in biological triplicate at 6 time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 h) or after mock infection at 0 or 24 h (Figure 1 A). Using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) proteomics approach, each sample was then partitioned and analyzed for changes in global protein abundance or phosphorylation (data available in Table S1). Chlorocebus sabaeus and human protein sequences were aligned, and phosphoryl"}