PMC:7258756 / 16141-16945 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"239","span":{"begin":269,"end":272},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"240","span":{"begin":45,"end":55},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"241","span":{"begin":346,"end":356},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"242","span":{"begin":405,"end":420},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"243","span":{"begin":617,"end":627},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"244","span":{"begin":705,"end":715},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"245","span":{"begin":747,"end":757},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A239","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"239","obj":"Gene:6195"},{"id":"A240","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"240","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A241","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"241","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A242","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"242","obj":"Tax:694002"},{"id":"A243","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"243","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A244","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"244","obj":"Tax:2697049"},{"id":"A245","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"245","obj":"Tax:2697049"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T80","span":{"begin":25,"end":31},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T81","span":{"begin":118,"end":120},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T82","span":{"begin":125,"end":127},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T83","span":{"begin":300,"end":302},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T84","span":{"begin":322,"end":324},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T85","span":{"begin":481,"end":483},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T86","span":{"begin":544,"end":550},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A80","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T80","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma84116"},{"id":"A81","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T81","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma82740"},{"id":"A82","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T82","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma82739"},{"id":"A83","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T83","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma82740"},{"id":"A84","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T84","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma82739"},{"id":"A85","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T85","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma82740"},{"id":"A86","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T86","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma84116"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T129","span":{"begin":45,"end":53},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T130","span":{"begin":45,"end":49},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T131","span":{"begin":346,"end":354},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T132","span":{"begin":346,"end":350},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T133","span":{"begin":617,"end":625},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T134","span":{"begin":617,"end":621},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T135","span":{"begin":705,"end":713},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T136","span":{"begin":705,"end":709},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T137","span":{"begin":747,"end":755},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T138","span":{"begin":747,"end":751},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A129","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T129","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A130","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T130","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A131","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T131","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A132","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T132","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A133","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T133","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A134","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T134","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A135","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T135","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A136","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T136","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A137","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T137","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"},{"id":"A138","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T138","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0005091"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T111","span":{"begin":125,"end":127},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001627"},{"id":"T112","span":{"begin":322,"end":324},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001627"},{"id":"T113","span":{"begin":758,"end":765},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_10239"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T69","span":{"begin":118,"end":120},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T70","span":{"begin":125,"end":127},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T71","span":{"begin":300,"end":302},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T72","span":{"begin":322,"end":324},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T73","span":{"begin":481,"end":483},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A69","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T69","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_36976"},{"id":"A70","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T70","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_33709"},{"id":"A71","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T71","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_36976"},{"id":"A72","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T72","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_33709"},{"id":"A73","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T73","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_36976"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T123","span":{"begin":0,"end":209},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T124","span":{"begin":210,"end":338},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T125","span":{"begin":339,"end":486},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T126","span":{"begin":487,"end":647},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T127","span":{"begin":648,"end":735},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T128","span":{"begin":736,"end":804},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32242873-32004758-47036569","span":{"begin":484,"end":485},"obj":"32004758"},{"id":"T6574","span":{"begin":484,"end":485},"obj":"32004758"}],"text":"Analysis of the complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 from the positive cases in India revealed that the percentage nt and aa differences between case 1 and case 3 were 0.038 and 0.10 per cent, respectively. The sequences of case 1 and case 3 diverged from the Wuhan-Hu1 sequence by 0.017 per cent nt and 0.041 per cent aa respectively. Indian SARS-CoV-2 clustered with the Sarbecovirus subgenus of the Betacoronavirus genus and was closest to the BatCoV RaTG13 sequence (96.09% nt)8. The phylogenetic comparison showed the clustering of the genome sequences of case 1 and case 3 with the existing sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 sequences (Fig. 1). The phylogeny revealed emerging heterogeneity within the SARS-CoV-2 sequences globally. The Indian SARS-CoV-2 viruses were positioned in different clusters."}