PMC:7079862 / 36209-36594 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"1258","span":{"begin":371,"end":379},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"1261","span":{"begin":197,"end":222},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A1258","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"1258","obj":"Tax:9606"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Yet, a post hoc Bayesian analysis found that the interpretation of benefit versus no benefit in this trial is critically dependent upon the range of prior assumptions reflecting varying degrees of skepticism and enthusiasm of previous evidence for the benefit of ECMO—clinicians with more enthusiasm for the benefit of ECMO may be justified in considering it for certain patients [62]."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T260","span":{"begin":5,"end":6},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"}],"text":"Yet, a post hoc Bayesian analysis found that the interpretation of benefit versus no benefit in this trial is critically dependent upon the range of prior assumptions reflecting varying degrees of skepticism and enthusiasm of previous evidence for the benefit of ECMO—clinicians with more enthusiasm for the benefit of ECMO may be justified in considering it for certain patients [62]."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T256","span":{"begin":0,"end":385},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Yet, a post hoc Bayesian analysis found that the interpretation of benefit versus no benefit in this trial is critically dependent upon the range of prior assumptions reflecting varying degrees of skepticism and enthusiasm of previous evidence for the benefit of ECMO—clinicians with more enthusiasm for the benefit of ECMO may be justified in considering it for certain patients [62]."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32040667-30347031-47981343","span":{"begin":381,"end":383},"obj":"30347031"},{"id":"T43058","span":{"begin":381,"end":383},"obj":"30347031"}],"text":"Yet, a post hoc Bayesian analysis found that the interpretation of benefit versus no benefit in this trial is critically dependent upon the range of prior assumptions reflecting varying degrees of skepticism and enthusiasm of previous evidence for the benefit of ECMO—clinicians with more enthusiasm for the benefit of ECMO may be justified in considering it for certain patients [62]."}