PMC:7075079 / 8064-8599 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    LitCovid-PubTator

    {"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"189","span":{"begin":71,"end":75},"obj":"Chemical"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [18]\nThe Chinese version of the GSES was used to measure the feelings of self-efficacy by the medical staff [18]. The scale consisted of ten items, with a score for each item of between 1–4, and the total score of 10–40, with the final points were divided by 10. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy [18]. The Chinese version of the GSES has previously been shown to have high sensitivity and validity [18]. The Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency for the use of the GSES was 0.805."}

    LitCovid-PD-UBERON

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T11","span":{"begin":26,"end":31},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":157,"end":162},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A11","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T11","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002542"},{"id":"A12","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T12","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002542"}],"text":"The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [18]\nThe Chinese version of the GSES was used to measure the feelings of self-efficacy by the medical staff [18]. The scale consisted of ten items, with a score for each item of between 1–4, and the total score of 10–40, with the final points were divided by 10. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy [18]. The Chinese version of the GSES has previously been shown to have high sensitivity and validity [18]. The Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency for the use of the GSES was 0.805."}

    LitCovid-PD-CLO

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T23","span":{"begin":40,"end":42},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050510"},{"id":"T24","span":{"begin":148,"end":150},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050510"},{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":176,"end":179},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050884"},{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":192,"end":193},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T27","span":{"begin":348,"end":350},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050510"},{"id":"T28","span":{"begin":385,"end":388},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0051582"},{"id":"T29","span":{"begin":450,"end":452},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050510"}],"text":"The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [18]\nThe Chinese version of the GSES was used to measure the feelings of self-efficacy by the medical staff [18]. The scale consisted of ten items, with a score for each item of between 1–4, and the total score of 10–40, with the final points were divided by 10. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy [18]. The Chinese version of the GSES has previously been shown to have high sensitivity and validity [18]. The Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency for the use of the GSES was 0.805."}

    LitCovid-PD-CHEBI

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":470,"end":475},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A6","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T6","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_30216"}],"text":"The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [18]\nThe Chinese version of the GSES was used to measure the feelings of self-efficacy by the medical staff [18]. The scale consisted of ten items, with a score for each item of between 1–4, and the total score of 10–40, with the final points were divided by 10. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy [18]. The Chinese version of the GSES has previously been shown to have high sensitivity and validity [18]. The Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency for the use of the GSES was 0.805."}

    LitCovid-sentences

    {"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T71","span":{"begin":0,"end":43},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T72","span":{"begin":44,"end":152},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T73","span":{"begin":153,"end":301},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T74","span":{"begin":302,"end":352},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T75","span":{"begin":353,"end":454},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T76","span":{"begin":455,"end":535},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [18]\nThe Chinese version of the GSES was used to measure the feelings of self-efficacy by the medical staff [18]. The scale consisted of ten items, with a score for each item of between 1–4, and the total score of 10–40, with the final points were divided by 10. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy [18]. The Chinese version of the GSES has previously been shown to have high sensitivity and validity [18]. The Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency for the use of the GSES was 0.805."}

    2_test

    {"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"32132521-29530024-69227843","span":{"begin":40,"end":42},"obj":"29530024"},{"id":"32132521-29530024-69227844","span":{"begin":148,"end":150},"obj":"29530024"},{"id":"32132521-29530024-69227845","span":{"begin":348,"end":350},"obj":"29530024"},{"id":"32132521-29530024-69227846","span":{"begin":450,"end":452},"obj":"29530024"}],"text":"The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) [18]\nThe Chinese version of the GSES was used to measure the feelings of self-efficacy by the medical staff [18]. The scale consisted of ten items, with a score for each item of between 1–4, and the total score of 10–40, with the final points were divided by 10. Higher scores indicated higher self-efficacy [18]. The Chinese version of the GSES has previously been shown to have high sensitivity and validity [18]. The Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency for the use of the GSES was 0.805."}