PMC:4913875 / 20123-20794 JSONTXT

{"project":"testtesttest","denotations":[{"id":"T121","span":{"begin":37,"end":44},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T122","span":{"begin":306,"end":313},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T123","span":{"begin":347,"end":354},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A121","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T121","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_3010058"},{"id":"A122","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T122","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_3010058"},{"id":"A123","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T123","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_3010058"}],"text":"Figure 4: z-Value development of DAH annulus size for subgroups over time. Black lines delineate patients younger than 10 years with a DAH smaller than 15 mm at implantation, green—patients younger than 10 years with a DAH bigger than 15 mm and red—patients older than 10 years. z-Value development of DAH annulus size over time. Package labelled annulus diameter was rounded to z-value integers, and each postoperative measurement is again expressed as a z-value according to the actual height and weight of the patient. A loess fit curve was then drawn for each implant size group. The green area shows the normal range in the middle of which the lines should converge."}