PMC:4289681 / 32757-35309 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    2_test

    {"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"25557782-16353217-2052286","span":{"begin":827,"end":829},"obj":"16353217"}],"text":"To investigate the population structure within the Inuit ancestry, we inferred ancestry proportions with higher numbers of assumed ancestral populations (K = 3–5). When three ancestral populations (K = 3) were assumed, the Danes were again assigned one ancestry component, but Greenlanders in Qaanaaq in North Greenland and in Tasiilaq in East Greenland were also each assigned their own component (Figure 2). The rest of the Greenlandic locations were inferred to be mixtures of all three components. When four ancestral populations (K = 4) were assumed, the results remained similar, except in this case, all the Greenlandic locations other than Qaanaaq and Tasiilaq were inferred to be mixtures of all four components. These results do not support the claim of a shared genetic component between North and East Greenlanders,13 but it fits well with the geographic regions in Greenland, where the two geographically extreme locations are Qaanaaq in the north and Tasiilaq in the east. Both of these locations are fairly isolated from the west and south of Greenland, where most Greenlanders live. The physical distance between Tasiilaq and Qaanaaq and the rest of the locations might also explain why these locations have less gene flow from Europe. Further increasing the number of assumed ancestry components (K = 5), we found that the areas around Upernavik and Maniitsoq also received their own predominant ancestry component. Interestingly, the South village population was not assigned a unique ancestry component but was the only West Greenlandic population to be assigned a large amount of Tasiilaq ancestry. For the analyses performed with higher K values (K \u003e 2), it should be noted that care should be taken when results are interpreted because the model underlying the program ADMIXTURE might not represent the nature of the data well. First, the fact that none of the individuals from Upernavik villages and Maniitsoq villages were inferred to be 100% from the components that are predominant in these locations at K = 5 could be an indication that this K value is too high. Second, the fact that the individuals from West Greenland were inferred to have ancestry from both Qaanaaq and Tasiilaq under the K = 3–4 models does not necessarily indicate that the West Greenlanders are admixed. These results could also be caused by a scenario where Greenland was settled by Inuit who entered North Greenland and from there migrated to South Greenland along the west coast and from there to East Greenland. We will return to this point later."}