PMC:2940450 / 12615-13436 JSONTXT

{"project":"0_colil","denotations":[{"id":"20859524-10700263-131723","span":{"begin":335,"end":339},"obj":"10700263"},{"id":"20859524-15872107-131724","span":{"begin":381,"end":385},"obj":"15872107"},{"id":"20859524-15746002-131725","span":{"begin":605,"end":609},"obj":"15746002"},{"id":"20859524-18308706-131726","span":{"begin":627,"end":631},"obj":"18308706"}],"text":"Given that the findings from the above studies are being explicitly related to those of our own neuroimaging study, it is of relevance to ascertain the degree of spatial concordance of the parietal activation sites. In some cases, the concordance was good when compared to other attentional studies in the literature (Corbetta et al., 2000; Hopfinger et al., 2000; Kincade et al., 2005), such as target-related activations in the IPS (distance between our study and relevant published reports: ∼6 mm). However, the concordance with the studies investigating attention and motivation per se (Small et al., 2005; Mohanty et al., 2008) was less impressive, such as ∼17 mm for the PCC, and even ∼23 mm for the TPJ. Hence, it will be important in the future to understand the reasons behind the sources of spatial variability."}

{"project":"TEST0","denotations":[{"id":"20859524-119-127-131723","span":{"begin":335,"end":339},"obj":"[\"10700263\"]"},{"id":"20859524-165-173-131724","span":{"begin":381,"end":385},"obj":"[\"15872107\"]"},{"id":"20859524-103-111-131725","span":{"begin":605,"end":609},"obj":"[\"15746002\"]"},{"id":"20859524-125-133-131726","span":{"begin":627,"end":631},"obj":"[\"18308706\"]"}],"text":"Given that the findings from the above studies are being explicitly related to those of our own neuroimaging study, it is of relevance to ascertain the degree of spatial concordance of the parietal activation sites. In some cases, the concordance was good when compared to other attentional studies in the literature (Corbetta et al., 2000; Hopfinger et al., 2000; Kincade et al., 2005), such as target-related activations in the IPS (distance between our study and relevant published reports: ∼6 mm). However, the concordance with the studies investigating attention and motivation per se (Small et al., 2005; Mohanty et al., 2008) was less impressive, such as ∼17 mm for the PCC, and even ∼23 mm for the TPJ. Hence, it will be important in the future to understand the reasons behind the sources of spatial variability."}

{"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"20859524-10700263-38088804","span":{"begin":335,"end":339},"obj":"10700263"},{"id":"20859524-15872107-38088805","span":{"begin":381,"end":385},"obj":"15872107"},{"id":"20859524-15746002-38088806","span":{"begin":605,"end":609},"obj":"15746002"},{"id":"20859524-18308706-38088807","span":{"begin":627,"end":631},"obj":"18308706"}],"text":"Given that the findings from the above studies are being explicitly related to those of our own neuroimaging study, it is of relevance to ascertain the degree of spatial concordance of the parietal activation sites. In some cases, the concordance was good when compared to other attentional studies in the literature (Corbetta et al., 2000; Hopfinger et al., 2000; Kincade et al., 2005), such as target-related activations in the IPS (distance between our study and relevant published reports: ∼6 mm). However, the concordance with the studies investigating attention and motivation per se (Small et al., 2005; Mohanty et al., 2008) was less impressive, such as ∼17 mm for the PCC, and even ∼23 mm for the TPJ. Hence, it will be important in the future to understand the reasons behind the sources of spatial variability."}