PMC:2940023 / 26656-27217 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    0_colil

    {"project":"0_colil","denotations":[{"id":"20559838-17919567-57207","span":{"begin":261,"end":263},"obj":"17919567"}],"text":"Ideally, the probability categories should be based on clinically relevant cutoffs. However, no well-established clinically relevant probability threshold exists. The probability of CAD is commonly defined as low (\u003c30%), intermediate (≥30–70%) and high (≥70%) [26]. In our view the intermediate category is rather wide, which is why we divided this category into low–intermediate (≥30–50%) and intermediate–high (≥50–70%). It should be noted that the overall percentage of reclassification is highly dependent on the choice and number of probability categories."}

    2_test

    {"project":"2_test","denotations":[{"id":"20559838-17919567-29364909","span":{"begin":261,"end":263},"obj":"17919567"}],"text":"Ideally, the probability categories should be based on clinically relevant cutoffs. However, no well-established clinically relevant probability threshold exists. The probability of CAD is commonly defined as low (\u003c30%), intermediate (≥30–70%) and high (≥70%) [26]. In our view the intermediate category is rather wide, which is why we divided this category into low–intermediate (≥30–50%) and intermediate–high (≥50–70%). It should be noted that the overall percentage of reclassification is highly dependent on the choice and number of probability categories."}

    TEST0

    {"project":"TEST0","denotations":[{"id":"20559838-98-104-57207","span":{"begin":261,"end":263},"obj":"[\"17919567\"]"}],"text":"Ideally, the probability categories should be based on clinically relevant cutoffs. However, no well-established clinically relevant probability threshold exists. The probability of CAD is commonly defined as low (\u003c30%), intermediate (≥30–70%) and high (≥70%) [26]. In our view the intermediate category is rather wide, which is why we divided this category into low–intermediate (≥30–50%) and intermediate–high (≥50–70%). It should be noted that the overall percentage of reclassification is highly dependent on the choice and number of probability categories."}

    MyTest

    {"project":"MyTest","denotations":[{"id":"20559838-17919567-29364909","span":{"begin":261,"end":263},"obj":"17919567"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/testbase"},{"prefix":"UniProtKB","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/"},{"prefix":"uniprot","uri":"https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/"}],"text":"Ideally, the probability categories should be based on clinically relevant cutoffs. However, no well-established clinically relevant probability threshold exists. The probability of CAD is commonly defined as low (\u003c30%), intermediate (≥30–70%) and high (≥70%) [26]. In our view the intermediate category is rather wide, which is why we divided this category into low–intermediate (≥30–50%) and intermediate–high (≥50–70%). It should be noted that the overall percentage of reclassification is highly dependent on the choice and number of probability categories."}