PubMed:762161 / 304-428 JSONTXT

{"project":"Test-Species-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"27","span":{"begin":62,"end":69},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"28","span":{"begin":116,"end":123},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A27","pred":"resolved_to","subj":"27","obj":"MESH:D014574"},{"id":"A28","pred":"resolved_to","subj":"28","obj":"MESH:D014574"}],"text":"Complex I with higher buoyant density had 22% protein and 18% uronate, whereas Complex II had 11% protein and 23.6% uronate."}

{"project":"Test-Species-PubDictionaries-PubMedBERT","denotations":[{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":62,"end":69},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":116,"end":123},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A5","pred":"db_id","subj":"T5","obj":"117838"},{"id":"A6","pred":"db_id","subj":"T6","obj":"117838"}],"text":"Complex I with higher buoyant density had 22% protein and 18% uronate, whereas Complex II had 11% protein and 23.6% uronate."}

{"project":"sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":0,"end":124},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":0,"end":124},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Complex I with higher buoyant density had 22% protein and 18% uronate, whereas Complex II had 11% protein and 23.6% uronate."}

{"project":"Organism-PubDic-Bert-8","denotations":[{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":62,"end":69},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"T6","span":{"begin":116,"end":123},"obj":"Species"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A5","pred":"db_id","subj":"T5","obj":"117838"},{"id":"A6","pred":"db_id","subj":"T6","obj":"117838"}],"text":"Complex I with higher buoyant density had 22% protein and 18% uronate, whereas Complex II had 11% protein and 23.6% uronate."}

{"project":"GlyCosmos15-Sentences","blocks":[{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":0,"end":124},"obj":"Sentence"}],"text":"Complex I with higher buoyant density had 22% protein and 18% uronate, whereas Complex II had 11% protein and 23.6% uronate."}