PubMed:28556876 JSONTXT

{"project":"luoyt2021_800_3","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":231,"end":251},"obj":"DP"}],"text":"Comparison of Two Cognitive Training Programs With Effects on Functional Activities and Quality of Life.\nThe aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of two types of cognitive training in 60 older adults with mild cognitive impairment by assessing the impact on functional activities, quality of life (QOL), and various cognitive functions. The primary outcomes were functional activity level and QOL. The secondary outcome was cognitive examination. Group assignment was random. Group A (n = 30) underwent CogniPlus, a computer-based, cognitive training. Group B (n = 30) underwent classical group-based cognitive training. Both programs comprised two 30-minute sessions per week for 10 weeks. After training, group A had better QOL (p \u003c 0.001, effect size [ES] = 0.69) and better attention (increased load score, p \u003c 0.05, ES = -0.23; errors, p \u003c 0.001, ES = -0.47); however, there were no group differences in functional activity level. Group A demonstrated larger improvements in QOL and attention than group B (i.e., classical cognitive training), but the transfer to functional activities was the same between groups. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017; 10(4):172-180.]."}

{"project":"Linmchun_800_3","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":231,"end":251},"obj":"DP"}],"text":"Comparison of Two Cognitive Training Programs With Effects on Functional Activities and Quality of Life.\nThe aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of two types of cognitive training in 60 older adults with mild cognitive impairment by assessing the impact on functional activities, quality of life (QOL), and various cognitive functions. The primary outcomes were functional activity level and QOL. The secondary outcome was cognitive examination. Group assignment was random. Group A (n = 30) underwent CogniPlus, a computer-based, cognitive training. Group B (n = 30) underwent classical group-based cognitive training. Both programs comprised two 30-minute sessions per week for 10 weeks. After training, group A had better QOL (p \u003c 0.001, effect size [ES] = 0.69) and better attention (increased load score, p \u003c 0.05, ES = -0.23; errors, p \u003c 0.001, ES = -0.47); however, there were no group differences in functional activity level. Group A demonstrated larger improvements in QOL and attention than group B (i.e., classical cognitive training), but the transfer to functional activities was the same between groups. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017; 10(4):172-180.]."}