PubMed:26387996 / 1368-1931
Annnotations
GoldHamster
Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
---|---|---|---|---|
T21 | 37-49 | GO:0005702 | denotes | constriction |
T22 | 64-73 | SO:0000804 | denotes | construct |
T23 | 154-160 | UBERON:0000043 | denotes | tendon |
T24 | 181-185 | original_id | denotes | term |
T25 | 308-314 | UBERON:0000043 | denotes | tendon |
T26 | 492-501 | GO:0043495 | denotes | anchoring |
PubMed_Structured_Abstracts
Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
---|---|---|---|---|
T4 | 0-563 | CONCLUSIONS | denotes | Additional to the commonly described constriction of the repair construct, the rotating deformation is the main reason for repair site gapping in Kessler tendon repair methods. The term "locking" in a Kessler repair is misleading. The cruciate repairs tended to loose grip and drag (cheese-wire) through the tendon and therefore lead to gapping. The most stable repair constructs in all three dimensions were the Adelaide repair and its interlocking modification. This is due to the superior anchoring qualities of its cross locks and three dimensional stability. |
Goldhamster2_Cellosaurus
Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
---|---|---|---|---|
T8 | 199-200 | CVCL_6479|Finite_cell_line|Mus musculus | denotes | a |
T9 | 268-272 | CVCL_0H63|Induced_pluripotent_stem_cell|Homo sapiens | denotes | grip |