PubMed:24064942 JSONTXT

{"project":"Allie","denotations":[{"id":"SS1_24064942_2_0","span":{"begin":218,"end":249},"obj":"expanded"},{"id":"SS2_24064942_2_0","span":{"begin":251,"end":254},"obj":"abbr"},{"id":"SS1_24064942_2_1","span":{"begin":274,"end":290},"obj":"expanded"},{"id":"SS2_24064942_2_1","span":{"begin":292,"end":295},"obj":"abbr"},{"id":"SS1_24064942_6_0","span":{"begin":814,"end":836},"obj":"expanded"},{"id":"SS2_24064942_6_0","span":{"begin":838,"end":841},"obj":"abbr"}],"relations":[{"id":"AE1_24064942_2_0","pred":"abbreviatedTo","subj":"SS1_24064942_2_0","obj":"SS2_24064942_2_0"},{"id":"AE1_24064942_2_1","pred":"abbreviatedTo","subj":"SS1_24064942_2_1","obj":"SS2_24064942_2_1"},{"id":"AE1_24064942_6_0","pred":"abbreviatedTo","subj":"SS1_24064942_6_0","obj":"SS2_24064942_6_0"}],"text":"Capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification of a plate-haptic design microincision cataract surgery intraocular lens: 3-year results of a randomised trial.\nPURPOSE: To compare capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) of a plate-haptic intraocular lens (IOL) and a standard three-piece open-loop-haptic IOL of the same acrylic material.\nMETHODS: In this randomised bilateral patient-masked and examiner-masked study, each patient received a microincision cataract surgery IOL (MICS IOL; Acri.Smart 46S=CT SHERIS 209M) in one eye and a small incision cataract surgery IOL (SICS IOL; AcriLyc 53N = CT 53N, both Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) as a control in the contralateral eye. Follow-up examinations were performed 1 h, 1 week, 1 month, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured and retroillumination images were performed at all postoperative follow-ups. Furthermore, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, autorefraction and subjective refraction were assessed.\nRESULTS: In total, 50 eyes of 25 patients were included. The ACD difference between the MICS IOL and the SICS IOL was not significant at any time point (p\u003e0.05). Distance-corrected visual acuity at the 3-year follow-up was similar and not significantly different between the groups (p=0.48). Mean AQUA score in the MICS IOL group and in the SICS IOL group at the 3-year follow-up was 2.3 (SD ±2.3) and 2.1 (SD ±2.2), respectively (p=0.79).\nCONCLUSIONS: The investigated hydrophilic acrylic plate-haptic MICS IOL with a hydrophobic surface showed comparable results concerning capsular bag stability and PCO rates up to 3 years compared with a SICS IOL of the same material."}

{"project":"Zierdiyeerkenaili_800_3","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":493,"end":501},"obj":"DP"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":98,"end":106},"obj":"DP"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":588,"end":596},"obj":"DP"}],"text":"Capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification of a plate-haptic design microincision cataract surgery intraocular lens: 3-year results of a randomised trial.\nPURPOSE: To compare capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) of a plate-haptic intraocular lens (IOL) and a standard three-piece open-loop-haptic IOL of the same acrylic material.\nMETHODS: In this randomised bilateral patient-masked and examiner-masked study, each patient received a microincision cataract surgery IOL (MICS IOL; Acri.Smart 46S=CT SHERIS 209M) in one eye and a small incision cataract surgery IOL (SICS IOL; AcriLyc 53N = CT 53N, both Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) as a control in the contralateral eye. Follow-up examinations were performed 1 h, 1 week, 1 month, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured and retroillumination images were performed at all postoperative follow-ups. Furthermore, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, autorefraction and subjective refraction were assessed.\nRESULTS: In total, 50 eyes of 25 patients were included. The ACD difference between the MICS IOL and the SICS IOL was not significant at any time point (p\u003e0.05). Distance-corrected visual acuity at the 3-year follow-up was similar and not significantly different between the groups (p=0.48). Mean AQUA score in the MICS IOL group and in the SICS IOL group at the 3-year follow-up was 2.3 (SD ±2.3) and 2.1 (SD ±2.2), respectively (p=0.79).\nCONCLUSIONS: The investigated hydrophilic acrylic plate-haptic MICS IOL with a hydrophobic surface showed comparable results concerning capsular bag stability and PCO rates up to 3 years compared with a SICS IOL of the same material."}

{"project":"yaoziqian_800_3","denotations":[{"id":"T1","span":{"begin":98,"end":106},"obj":"DP"},{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":493,"end":501},"obj":"DP"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":588,"end":596},"obj":"DP"}],"text":"Capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification of a plate-haptic design microincision cataract surgery intraocular lens: 3-year results of a randomised trial.\nPURPOSE: To compare capsular bag stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) of a plate-haptic intraocular lens (IOL) and a standard three-piece open-loop-haptic IOL of the same acrylic material.\nMETHODS: In this randomised bilateral patient-masked and examiner-masked study, each patient received a microincision cataract surgery IOL (MICS IOL; Acri.Smart 46S=CT SHERIS 209M) in one eye and a small incision cataract surgery IOL (SICS IOL; AcriLyc 53N = CT 53N, both Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) as a control in the contralateral eye. Follow-up examinations were performed 1 h, 1 week, 1 month, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured and retroillumination images were performed at all postoperative follow-ups. Furthermore, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, autorefraction and subjective refraction were assessed.\nRESULTS: In total, 50 eyes of 25 patients were included. The ACD difference between the MICS IOL and the SICS IOL was not significant at any time point (p\u003e0.05). Distance-corrected visual acuity at the 3-year follow-up was similar and not significantly different between the groups (p=0.48). Mean AQUA score in the MICS IOL group and in the SICS IOL group at the 3-year follow-up was 2.3 (SD ±2.3) and 2.1 (SD ±2.2), respectively (p=0.79).\nCONCLUSIONS: The investigated hydrophilic acrylic plate-haptic MICS IOL with a hydrophobic surface showed comparable results concerning capsular bag stability and PCO rates up to 3 years compared with a SICS IOL of the same material."}