PubMed:23480238 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    Allie

    {"project":"Allie","denotations":[{"id":"SS1_23480238_2_0","span":{"begin":232,"end":256},"obj":"expanded"},{"id":"SS2_23480238_2_0","span":{"begin":258,"end":261},"obj":"abbr"},{"id":"SS1_23480238_2_1","span":{"begin":318,"end":334},"obj":"expanded"},{"id":"SS2_23480238_2_1","span":{"begin":336,"end":338},"obj":"abbr"}],"relations":[{"id":"AE1_23480238_2_0","pred":"abbreviatedTo","subj":"SS1_23480238_2_0","obj":"SS2_23480238_2_0"},{"id":"AE1_23480238_2_1","pred":"abbreviatedTo","subj":"SS1_23480238_2_1","obj":"SS2_23480238_2_1"}],"text":"A randomized, double-blind, controlled study and pooled analysis of two identical trials of fermented milk containing probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis CNCM I-2494 in healthy women reporting minor digestive symptoms.\nBACKGROUND: The probiotic fermented milk (PFM) containing Bifidobacterium lactis CNCM I-2494 improved gastrointestinal (GI) well-being and digestive symptoms in a previous trial involving women reporting minor digestive symptoms. Our objective is to confirm these findings in a second study and in a pooled analysis of both studies.\nMETHODS: In this double-blind, controlled, parallel design study, subjects without diagnosed GI disorders consumed PFM or control dairy product daily for 4 weeks. Endpoints comprised weekly assessment of GI well-being (primary endpoint), rate of responders and digestive symptoms. Data were analyzed on full analysis set population (n = 324) and on the pooled data of randomized subjects of this study with those of the first study (n = 538).\nKEY RESULTS: In this second study, no significant difference was observed in the percentage of women reporting an improvement in GI well-being [OR = 1.20 (95% CI 0.87, 1.66)] and rate of responders [OR = 1.38 (95% CI 0.89, 2.14)]. Composite score of digestive symptoms was significantly (P \u003c 0.05) reduced in PFM when compared to the control group [LSmean = -0.42 (95% CI -0.81, -0.03)]. In the pooled analysis, significant differences were observed in favor of PFM group for all endpoints: percentage of women with improved GI well-being [OR = 1.36 (95% CI 1.07, 1.73)], rate of responders [OR = 1.53 (95% CI 1.09, 2.16)] and composite score of digestive symptoms [LSmean = -0.48 (95% CI -0.80, -0.16)].\nCONCLUSIONS \u0026 INFERENCES: This second study did not confirm improvement on the primary endpoint. However, a pooled analysis of the two trials showed improvement in GI well-being and digestive symptoms in women reporting minor digestive symptoms."}