PubMed:22823909
Annnotations
PubmedHPO
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 300-306 | HP_0002018 | denotes | nausea |
| T2 | 311-319 | HP_0002013 | denotes | vomiting |
Allie
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS1_22823909_2_0 | 139-179 | expanded | denotes | 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists |
| SS2_22823909_2_0 | 181-190 | abbr | denotes | 5-HT3 RAs |
| SS1_22823909_2_1 | 274-286 | expanded | denotes | chemotherapy |
| SS2_22823909_2_1 | 288-290 | abbr | denotes | CT |
| SS1_22823909_2_2 | 364-391 | expanded | denotes | highly emetogenic CT agents |
| SS2_22823909_2_2 | 393-396 | abbr | denotes | HEC |
| SS1_22823909_3_0 | 554-574 | expanded | denotes | emergency department |
| SS2_22823909_3_0 | 576-578 | abbr | denotes | ED |
| SS1_22823909_5_0 | 645-658 | expanded | denotes | breast cancer |
| SS2_22823909_5_0 | 660-662 | abbr | denotes | BC |
| SS1_22823909_5_1 | 699-725 | expanded | denotes | lung cancer on carboplatin |
| SS2_22823909_5_1 | 727-741 | abbr | denotes | LC-carboplatin |
| AE1_22823909_2_0 | SS1_22823909_2_0 | SS2_22823909_2_0 | abbreviatedTo | 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists,5-HT3 RAs |
| AE1_22823909_2_1 | SS1_22823909_2_1 | SS2_22823909_2_1 | abbreviatedTo | chemotherapy,CT |
| AE1_22823909_2_2 | SS1_22823909_2_2 | SS2_22823909_2_2 | abbreviatedTo | highly emetogenic CT agents,HEC |
| AE1_22823909_3_0 | SS1_22823909_3_0 | SS2_22823909_3_0 | abbreviatedTo | emergency department,ED |
| AE1_22823909_5_0 | SS1_22823909_5_0 | SS2_22823909_5_0 | abbreviatedTo | breast cancer,BC |
| AE1_22823909_5_1 | SS1_22823909_5_1 | SS2_22823909_5_1 | abbreviatedTo | lung cancer on carboplatin,LC-carboplatin |
PubMed_Structured_Abstracts
| Id | Subject | Object | Predicate | Lexical cue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 124-591 | BACKGROUND | denotes | 1st generation 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RAs), and palonosetron, a 2nd generation 5-HT3 RA, are indicated for the prevention of chemotherapy (CT)-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with moderately (MEC) and highly emetogenic CT agents (HEC). This study explores the impact of step therapy policies requiring use of an older 5-HT3 RA before palonosetron on risk of CINV associated with hospital or emergency department (ED) admissions. |
| T2 | 601-1281 | METHODS | denotes | Patients who received cyclophosphamide post breast cancer (BC) surgery or who were diagnosed with lung cancer on carboplatin (LC-carboplatin) or cisplatin (LC-cisplatin) were selected from PharMetrics' (IMS LifeLink) claims dataset (2005-2008). Patients were followed for 6 months from initial CT administration for CINV events identified through ICD-9-CM codes. Patients were grouped into those initiated with older, generic 5-HT3 RAs (ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron) and those initiated and maintained on palonosetron throughout study follow-up. CINV events and CINV days were analyzed using multivariate regressions controlling for demographic and clinical variables. |
| T3 | 1291-2214 | RESULTS | denotes | Eligible patients numbered 3,606 in BC, 4,497 in LC-carboplatin and 1,154 in LC-cisplatin cohorts, with 52%, 40%, and 34% in the palonosetron group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two 5-HT3 RA groups in age or Charlson Comorbidity Index among the two MEC cohorts (BC and LC-carboplatin). Among the LC-cisplatin cohort, palonosetron users were older with more males than the older 5-HT3 RA group (age: 60.1 vs. 61.3; males, 66.9% vs. 56.9%). Compared to the older 5-HT3 RAs, the palonosetron groups incurred 22%-51% fewer 5-HT3 RA pharmacy claims, had fewer patients with CINV events (3.5% vs. 5.5% in BC, 9.5% vs. 12.8% in LC-carboplatin, 16.4% vs. 21.7% in LC-cisplatin), and had lower risk for CINV events (odds ratios 0.62, 0.71, or 0.71, respectively; p<0.05). The BC and LC-carboplatin palonosetron groups experienced 50% and 30% fewer CINV days than the generic 5-HT3 RA group (p<0.05). |
| T4 | 2228-2524 | CONCLUSIONS | denotes | Patients with breast or lung cancer initiated and maintained on palonosetron were at significantly lower risk for potentially costly CINV versus those on older 5-HT3 RAs. Further studies on impact of step therapy policy are warranted in order to minimize the clinical and economic burden of CINV. |