> top > docs > PubMed:21218459 > annotations

PubMed:21218459 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

PubmedHPO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T1 173-179 HP_0002018 denotes Nausea
T2 184-192 HP_0002013 denotes vomiting
T3 210-236 HP_0004808 denotes acute myelogenous leukemia
T4 228-236 HP_0001909 denotes leukemia

Allie

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
SS1_21218459_2_0 210-236 expanded denotes acute myelogenous leukemia
SS2_21218459_2_0 238-241 abbr denotes AML
SS1_21218459_4_0 411-451 expanded denotes chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
SS2_21218459_4_0 453-457 abbr denotes CINV
AE1_21218459_2_0 SS1_21218459_2_0 SS2_21218459_2_0 abbreviatedTo acute myelogenous leukemia,AML
AE1_21218459_4_0 SS1_21218459_4_0 SS2_21218459_4_0 abbreviatedTo chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting,CINV

PubMed_Structured_Abstracts

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T1 173-313 BACKGROUND denotes Nausea and vomiting in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) can be from various causes, including the use of high-dose cytarabine.
T2 323-929 METHODS denotes The authors compared 2 schedules of palonosetron versus ondansetron in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with AML receiving high-dose cytarabine. Patients were randomized to: 1) ondansetron, 8 mg intravenously (IV), followed by 24 mg continuous infusion 30 minutes before high-dose cytarabine and until 12 hours after the high-dose cytarabine infusion ended; 2) palonosetron, 0.25 mg IV 30 minutes before chemotherapy, daily from Day 1 of high-dose cytarabine up to Day 5; or 3) palonosetron, 0.25 mg IV 30 minutes before high-dose cytarabine on Days 1, 3, and 5.
T3 939-1648 RESULTS denotes Forty-seven patients on ondansetron and 48 patients on each of the palonosetron arms were evaluable for efficacy. Patients in the palonosetron arms achieved higher complete response rates (no emetic episodes plus no rescue medication), but the difference was not statistically significant (ondansetron, 21%; palonosetron on Days 1-5, 31%; palonosetron on Days 1, 3, and 5, 35%; P = .32). Greater than 77% of patients in each arm were free of nausea on Day 1; however, on Days 2 through 5, the proportion of patients without nausea declined similarly in all 3 groups. On Days 6 and 7, significantly more patients receiving palonosetron on Days 1 to 5 were free of nausea (P = .001 and P = .0247, respectively).
T4 1662-1925 CONCLUSIONS denotes The daily assessments of emesis did not show significant differences between the study arms. Patients receiving palonosetron on Days 1 to 5 had significantly less severe nausea and experienced significantly less impact of CINV on daily activities on Days 6 and 7.