PubMed:19583848 / 917-1324 JSONTXT

{"project":"PubMed_Structured_Abstracts","denotations":[{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":0,"end":407},"obj":"RESULTS"}],"text":"All test concentrations of deet (0.001% to 100%) reduced the attractiveness of the synthetic blend. However, PMD was repellent only at 0.25%. Above this concentration, it significantly increased the attractiveness of the blend. There was no relationship between the repellent concentrations and the change in mosquito catches when either deet (r2 = 0.033, P = 0.302) or PMD (r2 = 0.020, P = 0.578) was used."}

{"project":"PMID_GLOBAL","denotations":[{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":109,"end":112},"obj":"DiseaseOrPhenotypicFeature"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":370,"end":373},"obj":"DiseaseOrPhenotypicFeature"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A3","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T3","obj":"0010714"},{"id":"A4","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T4","obj":"0010714"}],"text":"All test concentrations of deet (0.001% to 100%) reduced the attractiveness of the synthetic blend. However, PMD was repellent only at 0.25%. Above this concentration, it significantly increased the attractiveness of the blend. There was no relationship between the repellent concentrations and the change in mosquito catches when either deet (r2 = 0.033, P = 0.302) or PMD (r2 = 0.020, P = 0.578) was used."}