> top > docs > PubMed:11035325 > annotations

PubMed:11035325 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

sentences

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
TextSentencer_T1 0-125 Sentence denotes Expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia: is intrauterine growth restriction an indication for immediate delivery?
TextSentencer_T2 126-136 Sentence denotes OBJECTIVE:
TextSentencer_T3 137-243 Sentence denotes Expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia is gaining widespread acceptance in clinical practice.
TextSentencer_T4 244-688 Sentence denotes The objective of our study was 2-fold-to determine the frequency of fetal deterioration with expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia and to evaluate whether the presence of intrauterine growth restriction on admission is associated with a shorter admission-to-delivery interval or more deliveries resulting from nonreassuring fetal status in comparison with pregnancies with preeclampsia but without intrauterine growth restriction.
TextSentencer_T5 689-702 Sentence denotes STUDY DESIGN:
TextSentencer_T6 703-905 Sentence denotes This was an observational study of women with singleton pregnancies at <34 completed weeks' gestation who were admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of severe preeclampsia and managed expectantly.
TextSentencer_T7 906-1025 Sentence denotes Fetal status on admission, admission-to-delivery interval, indication for delivery, and neonatal outcome were examined.
TextSentencer_T8 1026-1034 Sentence denotes RESULTS:
TextSentencer_T9 1035-1101 Sentence denotes Forty-seven women were studied during a 3-year period (1996-1999).
TextSentencer_T10 1102-1154 Sentence denotes Gestational age at admission was 29.8 +/- 2.6 weeks.
TextSentencer_T11 1155-1282 Sentence denotes The mean admission-to-delivery interval for the entire group was 6.0 +/- 5.1 days; in 42.5% delivery was for fetal indications.
TextSentencer_T12 1283-1520 Sentence denotes In comparison with the absence of intrauterine growth restriction, the presence of intrauterine growth restriction at admission resulted in a significantly shorter admission-to-delivery interval (3.1 +/- 2.1 vs 6.6 +/- 6.1 days; P <.05).
TextSentencer_T13 1521-1608 Sentence denotes Most fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (85.7%) were delivered before 1 week.
TextSentencer_T14 1609-1828 Sentence denotes Although 57% of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction were delivered for fetal indications, versus 39% of fetuses without intrauterine growth restriction, these rates were not found to be significantly different.
TextSentencer_T15 1829-2003 Sentence denotes Neonatal outcomes, as reflected by Apgar scores, number of admissions to and duration of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal mortality rates, were similar.
TextSentencer_T16 2004-2015 Sentence denotes CONCLUSION:
TextSentencer_T17 2016-2230 Sentence denotes Pregnancies complicated by severe preterm preeclampsia and the presence of intrauterine growth restriction at admission may not benefit from expectant management beyond the 48 hours needed for betamethasone to act.
TextSentencer_T18 2231-2385 Sentence denotes Furthermore, all patients may benefit from close fetal monitoring before delivery because of the high rate of intervention for deteriorating fetal status.
T1 0-125 Sentence denotes Expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia: is intrauterine growth restriction an indication for immediate delivery?
T2 126-136 Sentence denotes OBJECTIVE:
T3 137-243 Sentence denotes Expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia is gaining widespread acceptance in clinical practice.
T4 244-688 Sentence denotes The objective of our study was 2-fold-to determine the frequency of fetal deterioration with expectant management of severe preterm preeclampsia and to evaluate whether the presence of intrauterine growth restriction on admission is associated with a shorter admission-to-delivery interval or more deliveries resulting from nonreassuring fetal status in comparison with pregnancies with preeclampsia but without intrauterine growth restriction.
T5 689-702 Sentence denotes STUDY DESIGN:
T6 703-905 Sentence denotes This was an observational study of women with singleton pregnancies at <34 completed weeks' gestation who were admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of severe preeclampsia and managed expectantly.
T7 906-1025 Sentence denotes Fetal status on admission, admission-to-delivery interval, indication for delivery, and neonatal outcome were examined.
T8 1026-1034 Sentence denotes RESULTS:
T9 1035-1101 Sentence denotes Forty-seven women were studied during a 3-year period (1996-1999).
T10 1102-1154 Sentence denotes Gestational age at admission was 29.8 +/- 2.6 weeks.
T11 1155-1282 Sentence denotes The mean admission-to-delivery interval for the entire group was 6.0 +/- 5.1 days; in 42.5% delivery was for fetal indications.
T12 1283-1520 Sentence denotes In comparison with the absence of intrauterine growth restriction, the presence of intrauterine growth restriction at admission resulted in a significantly shorter admission-to-delivery interval (3.1 +/- 2.1 vs 6.6 +/- 6.1 days; P <.05).
T13 1521-1608 Sentence denotes Most fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (85.7%) were delivered before 1 week.
T14 1609-1828 Sentence denotes Although 57% of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction were delivered for fetal indications, versus 39% of fetuses without intrauterine growth restriction, these rates were not found to be significantly different.
T15 1829-2003 Sentence denotes Neonatal outcomes, as reflected by Apgar scores, number of admissions to and duration of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, and neonatal mortality rates, were similar.
T16 2004-2015 Sentence denotes CONCLUSION:
T17 2016-2230 Sentence denotes Pregnancies complicated by severe preterm preeclampsia and the presence of intrauterine growth restriction at admission may not benefit from expectant management beyond the 48 hours needed for betamethasone to act.
T18 2231-2385 Sentence denotes Furthermore, all patients may benefit from close fetal monitoring before delivery because of the high rate of intervention for deteriorating fetal status.

Preeclampsia

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T1 39-51 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T2 176-188 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T3 376-388 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T4 631-643 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T5 868-880 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T6 2058-2070 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia

Preeclampsia-compare

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T1 39-51 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T2 176-188 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T3 376-388 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T4 631-643 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T5 868-880 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia
PD-Preeclampsia-B_T6 2058-2070 ORPHA:275555 denotes preeclampsia

PubCasesHPO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
TI1 39-51 HP:0100602 denotes preeclampsia
AB1 376-388 HP:0100602 denotes preeclampsia
AB2 631-643 HP:0100602 denotes preeclampsia
AB3 868-880 HP:0100602 denotes preeclampsia
AB4 2058-2070 HP:0100602 denotes preeclampsia

PubCasesORDO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
AB1 176-188 ORDO:275555 denotes preeclampsia
AB2 376-388 ORDO:275555 denotes preeclampsia
AB3 631-643 ORDO:275555 denotes preeclampsia
AB4 868-880 ORDO:275555 denotes preeclampsia
AB5 2058-2070 ORDO:275555 denotes preeclampsia