> top > docs > PMC:7796329 > spans > 65177-67807 > annotations

PMC:7796329 / 65177-67807 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

LitCovid-PubTator

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue tao:has_database_id
348 305-311 Species denotes people Tax:9606
349 1751-1756 Species denotes women Tax:9606
350 1880-1883 Species denotes men Tax:9606
351 724-731 Disease denotes anxiety MESH:D001007
352 872-880 Disease denotes COVID-19 MESH:C000657245
353 1276-1283 Disease denotes anxiety MESH:D001007
354 1384-1392 Disease denotes COVID-19 MESH:C000657245
355 2210-2217 Disease denotes anxiety MESH:D001007

LitCovid-PD-HP

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue hp_id
T22 724-731 Phenotype denotes anxiety http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739
T23 1276-1283 Phenotype denotes anxiety http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739
T24 2210-2217 Phenotype denotes anxiety http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739

LitCovid-sentences

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T543 0-33 Sentence denotes The main findings are as follows.
T544 34-173 Sentence denotes First, the simple frequency analysis shows that the percentage of respondents who agree with conspiracy theories ranges from 8.0% to 44.0%.
T545 174-259 Sentence denotes The belief rates are high for conspiracy theories concerning politicians or politics.
T546 260-399 Sentence denotes It is also noteworthy that the proportion of people who moderately believe conspiracy theories is significant, ranging from 28.6% to 40.7%.
T547 400-487 Sentence denotes This result suggests the potential for conspiracy theories to spread in Korean society.
T548 488-881 Sentence denotes Second, the mean analysis shows that beliefs in conspiracy theories differ greatly between groups supporting and opposing the current government; groups trusting and not trusting the government; groups with high and low perceived risk, anxiety, and negative emotions; groups with and without better qualitative information; and groups with and without poor health generally and after COVID-19.
T549 882-1108 Sentence denotes Third, the correlation analysis shows that the quality of information has the greatest correlation with beliefs in conspiracy theories, followed by trust in the government, support for Moon’s government, and negative emotions.
T550 1109-1454 Sentence denotes Fourth, the regression analysis shows that among the independent variables, authoritarianism, support for minority parties, religiosity, trust in SNS, perceived risk, anxiety, negative emotions, blame attribution, the quantity of information, health status, and health after COVID-19, all have positive effects on beliefs in conspiracy theories.
T551 1455-1652 Sentence denotes Support for Moon’s government, Christianity, trust in the government, perceived control, analytic thinking, knowledge, and the quality of information and gender (female), all have negative effects.
T552 1653-1733 Sentence denotes Overall, we consider 19 variables that influence beliefs in conspiracy theories.
T553 1734-1859 Sentence denotes The finding that women have less probability for believing in conspiracy theories than man is a sensitive for interpretation.
T554 1860-1961 Sentence denotes It is possible that men’s power orientation seems to be strengthen their belief in conspiracy theory.
T555 1962-2034 Sentence denotes However, this assumption should also be proved through further research.
T556 2035-2218 Sentence denotes The variable with the largest standardized regression coefficient is the quality of information, followed by health status, support for Moon’s government, perceived risk, and anxiety.
T557 2219-2334 Sentence denotes These results show that the quality of information is very important in suppressing beliefs in conspiracy theories.
T558 2335-2433 Sentence denotes The explanatory power of Model 1 is 20.8%, that of Model 2 is 17.3%, and that of Model 3 is 24.8%.
T559 2434-2630 Sentence denotes This result confirms that all three factors are important for explaining beliefs in conspiracy theories and suggests that additional variables are needed to increase the model’s explanatory power.