PMC:7796148 / 27525-28884 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"512","span":{"begin":461,"end":467},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"513","span":{"begin":203,"end":211},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"514","span":{"begin":489,"end":498},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"515","span":{"begin":811,"end":818},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A512","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"512","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A513","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"513","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A514","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"514","obj":"MESH:D007239"},{"id":"A515","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"515","obj":"MESH:D001007"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"There are a few factors that may have affected these results. As always, findings should be contextualized with respect to the time and circumstances of data collection. Lombardia and Veneto experienced COVID-19 issues for a longer period and had more contagions than Lazio and Campania. Resilience may have increased over time [37]. Another possible explanation concerns the role of media in transmission of threatening information, when the data was gathered people in areas with higher infection rates (e.g., north vs. south; Italy vs. UK) already received more threatening information, thus increasing their risk perception but also their strength. A second factor is that in July 2020 attention was focused on the central and southern regions because of seasonal tourism. This may be related to the higher anxiety and somatic issues in the Campania region at this point in time. Finally, as discussed in the introduction, one reason both Lombardia and Veneto were included in our study is because they are geographically contiguous but had been differentially affected by the pandemic. If differences reflect geography rather than extent of the health emergency, these may also relate to differences in attitudes or approach to the survey in different regions. Further investigations are necessary to clarify similarities and differences between regions."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T97","span":{"begin":811,"end":818},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A97","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T97","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000739"}],"text":"There are a few factors that may have affected these results. As always, findings should be contextualized with respect to the time and circumstances of data collection. Lombardia and Veneto experienced COVID-19 issues for a longer period and had more contagions than Lazio and Campania. Resilience may have increased over time [37]. Another possible explanation concerns the role of media in transmission of threatening information, when the data was gathered people in areas with higher infection rates (e.g., north vs. south; Italy vs. UK) already received more threatening information, thus increasing their risk perception but also their strength. A second factor is that in July 2020 attention was focused on the central and southern regions because of seasonal tourism. This may be related to the higher anxiety and somatic issues in the Campania region at this point in time. Finally, as discussed in the introduction, one reason both Lombardia and Veneto were included in our study is because they are geographically contiguous but had been differentially affected by the pandemic. If differences reflect geography rather than extent of the health emergency, these may also relate to differences in attitudes or approach to the survey in different regions. Further investigations are necessary to clarify similarities and differences between regions."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T233","span":{"begin":0,"end":61},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T234","span":{"begin":62,"end":169},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T235","span":{"begin":170,"end":287},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T236","span":{"begin":288,"end":333},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T237","span":{"begin":334,"end":652},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T238","span":{"begin":653,"end":776},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T239","span":{"begin":777,"end":883},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T240","span":{"begin":884,"end":1090},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T241","span":{"begin":1091,"end":1265},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T242","span":{"begin":1266,"end":1359},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"There are a few factors that may have affected these results. As always, findings should be contextualized with respect to the time and circumstances of data collection. Lombardia and Veneto experienced COVID-19 issues for a longer period and had more contagions than Lazio and Campania. Resilience may have increased over time [37]. Another possible explanation concerns the role of media in transmission of threatening information, when the data was gathered people in areas with higher infection rates (e.g., north vs. south; Italy vs. UK) already received more threatening information, thus increasing their risk perception but also their strength. A second factor is that in July 2020 attention was focused on the central and southern regions because of seasonal tourism. This may be related to the higher anxiety and somatic issues in the Campania region at this point in time. Finally, as discussed in the introduction, one reason both Lombardia and Veneto were included in our study is because they are geographically contiguous but had been differentially affected by the pandemic. If differences reflect geography rather than extent of the health emergency, these may also relate to differences in attitudes or approach to the survey in different regions. Further investigations are necessary to clarify similarities and differences between regions."}