PMC:7795972 / 1517-5048 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    LitCovid-PubTator

    {"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"28","span":{"begin":740,"end":748},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"29","span":{"begin":20,"end":44},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"30","span":{"begin":46,"end":54},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"31","span":{"begin":292,"end":305},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"32","span":{"begin":728,"end":739},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"33","span":{"begin":842,"end":850},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"41","span":{"begin":1041,"end":1047},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"42","span":{"begin":1108,"end":1114},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"43","span":{"begin":1144,"end":1175},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"44","span":{"begin":1249,"end":1255},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"45","span":{"begin":1327,"end":1333},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"46","span":{"begin":1782,"end":1792},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"47","span":{"begin":1798,"end":1817},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"49","span":{"begin":3247,"end":3255},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"52","span":{"begin":3294,"end":3299},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"53","span":{"begin":3381,"end":3389},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"55","span":{"begin":3480,"end":3488},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"65","span":{"begin":2056,"end":2062},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"66","span":{"begin":2830,"end":2835},"obj":"Species"},{"id":"67","span":{"begin":1986,"end":1994},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"68","span":{"begin":2258,"end":2264},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"69","span":{"begin":2337,"end":2345},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"70","span":{"begin":2700,"end":2709},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"71","span":{"begin":2713,"end":2720},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"72","span":{"begin":2854,"end":2862},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"73","span":{"begin":3030,"end":3038},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A28","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"28","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A29","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"29","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A30","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"30","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A31","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"31","obj":"MESH:D001102"},{"id":"A32","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"32","obj":"MESH:D001523"},{"id":"A33","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"33","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A41","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"41","obj":"MESH:D000079225"},{"id":"A42","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"42","obj":"MESH:D000079225"},{"id":"A43","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"43","obj":"MESH:D001068"},{"id":"A44","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"44","obj":"MESH:D000079225"},{"id":"A45","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"45","obj":"MESH:D000079225"},{"id":"A46","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"46","obj":"MESH:D000275"},{"id":"A47","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"47","obj":"MESH:D015430"},{"id":"A49","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"49","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A52","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"52","obj":"MESH:D000073893"},{"id":"A53","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"53","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A55","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"55","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A65","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"65","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A66","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"66","obj":"Tax:9606"},{"id":"A67","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"67","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A68","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"68","obj":"MESH:D000079225"},{"id":"A69","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"69","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A70","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"70","obj":"MESH:D000275"},{"id":"A71","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"71","obj":"MESH:D001007"},{"id":"A72","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"72","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A73","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"73","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"1. Introduction\nThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes a worldwide state of emergency that is unparalleled in recent times [1]. Countries all over the world have implemented unprecedented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in order to limit the spread of the novel viral disease, including regional- and national-level lockdowns and quarantine. As communities were closing down, concerns were raised about the impact of these interventions on other aspects of public health, including mental health [2]. In the wake of the first phase of the pandemic, evidence of its impact on mental health is emerging. Although limited, most current studies show an increased burden of mental health symptoms among psychiatric patients and healthcare workers and lower psychological well-being in the general population amid the COVID-19 outbreak [3]. Population-based studies have also revealed a high occurrence of self-reported psychological distress during the early phases of the pandemic in different populations [4,5,6].\nStress and emotional state influence the eating behavior. To many, stress and negative mood can induce loss of appetite and hypophagia [7,8]. However, for a major subset of individuals, negative emotions and stress cause them to eat more—a type of eating known as emotional eating [9]. Stress is known to induce a shift in individuals, making them favor hyperpalatable foods, i.e., calorie-dense foods high in fat and/or sugar content, and this tendency is stronger in emotional eaters [7,10]. Even under habitual circumstances, emotional eaters consume more energy-dense and sweet snack foods than others [11,12]. There is evidence emerging that points to the role of emotional eating as a behavioral mechanism mediating the association of depression with adverse weight gain [13,14]. Thus, emotional eating may pose an additional health burden to those vulnerable to eating more, and more unhealthily, during moments of hardship and distress.\nCOVID-19 represents a major disruption on the day-to-day life of most people in affected areas. There is reason to believe that the pandemic has an impact on the eating habits not only due to the practical effects of the lockdown, but also through its effect on perceived stress and psychological well-being. Current studies on eating habits amid the COVID-19 outbreak reveal a shift in self-reported eating towards increased appetite and overall food consumption, as well as increased snacking in-between meals [15,16,17]. A study regarding the most critical phase of the first Italian lockdown shows a substantial prevalence of emotional eating in the population, in particular among those that reported feeling depressed or anxious [4]. Similarly, a Chinese study on emotional eating and gestational weight gain amid the pandemic found that women who worried about COVID-19 had higher emotional eating scores [18]. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of emotional eating and its association with worries and psychological distress amid the COVID-19 lockdown through a large-scale population-based study in a major city in Norway. Our main research questions were:How prevalent was emotional eating among females and males in different age groups during the COVID-19 lockdown?\nDid the consumption of high-sugar foods and beverages differ between the overall population and those experiencing COVID-19-related worries or psychological distress?\nWas emotional eating associated with levels of COVID-19-related worries or psychological distress?"}

    LitCovid-PD-HP

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":1782,"end":1792},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T3","span":{"begin":1806,"end":1817},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T4","span":{"begin":2402,"end":2420},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T5","span":{"begin":2789,"end":2800},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A2","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000716"},{"id":"A3","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T3","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0004324"},{"id":"A4","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T4","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0002591"},{"id":"A5","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T5","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0004324"}],"text":"1. Introduction\nThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes a worldwide state of emergency that is unparalleled in recent times [1]. Countries all over the world have implemented unprecedented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in order to limit the spread of the novel viral disease, including regional- and national-level lockdowns and quarantine. As communities were closing down, concerns were raised about the impact of these interventions on other aspects of public health, including mental health [2]. In the wake of the first phase of the pandemic, evidence of its impact on mental health is emerging. Although limited, most current studies show an increased burden of mental health symptoms among psychiatric patients and healthcare workers and lower psychological well-being in the general population amid the COVID-19 outbreak [3]. Population-based studies have also revealed a high occurrence of self-reported psychological distress during the early phases of the pandemic in different populations [4,5,6].\nStress and emotional state influence the eating behavior. To many, stress and negative mood can induce loss of appetite and hypophagia [7,8]. However, for a major subset of individuals, negative emotions and stress cause them to eat more—a type of eating known as emotional eating [9]. Stress is known to induce a shift in individuals, making them favor hyperpalatable foods, i.e., calorie-dense foods high in fat and/or sugar content, and this tendency is stronger in emotional eaters [7,10]. Even under habitual circumstances, emotional eaters consume more energy-dense and sweet snack foods than others [11,12]. There is evidence emerging that points to the role of emotional eating as a behavioral mechanism mediating the association of depression with adverse weight gain [13,14]. Thus, emotional eating may pose an additional health burden to those vulnerable to eating more, and more unhealthily, during moments of hardship and distress.\nCOVID-19 represents a major disruption on the day-to-day life of most people in affected areas. There is reason to believe that the pandemic has an impact on the eating habits not only due to the practical effects of the lockdown, but also through its effect on perceived stress and psychological well-being. Current studies on eating habits amid the COVID-19 outbreak reveal a shift in self-reported eating towards increased appetite and overall food consumption, as well as increased snacking in-between meals [15,16,17]. A study regarding the most critical phase of the first Italian lockdown shows a substantial prevalence of emotional eating in the population, in particular among those that reported feeling depressed or anxious [4]. Similarly, a Chinese study on emotional eating and gestational weight gain amid the pandemic found that women who worried about COVID-19 had higher emotional eating scores [18]. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of emotional eating and its association with worries and psychological distress amid the COVID-19 lockdown through a large-scale population-based study in a major city in Norway. Our main research questions were:How prevalent was emotional eating among females and males in different age groups during the COVID-19 lockdown?\nDid the consumption of high-sugar foods and beverages differ between the overall population and those experiencing COVID-19-related worries or psychological distress?\nWas emotional eating associated with levels of COVID-19-related worries or psychological distress?"}

    LitCovid-sentences

    {"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T12","span":{"begin":0,"end":2},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T13","span":{"begin":3,"end":15},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T14","span":{"begin":16,"end":149},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":150,"end":371},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T16","span":{"begin":372,"end":530},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T17","span":{"begin":531,"end":631},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T18","span":{"begin":632,"end":864},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T19","span":{"begin":865,"end":1040},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T20","span":{"begin":1041,"end":1098},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T21","span":{"begin":1099,"end":1182},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T22","span":{"begin":1183,"end":1326},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T23","span":{"begin":1327,"end":1534},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T24","span":{"begin":1535,"end":1655},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T25","span":{"begin":1656,"end":1826},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T26","span":{"begin":1827,"end":1985},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T27","span":{"begin":1986,"end":2081},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T28","span":{"begin":2082,"end":2294},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T29","span":{"begin":2295,"end":2509},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T30","span":{"begin":2510,"end":2725},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T31","span":{"begin":2726,"end":2903},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T32","span":{"begin":2904,"end":3119},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T33","span":{"begin":3120,"end":3265},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T34","span":{"begin":3266,"end":3432},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T35","span":{"begin":3433,"end":3531},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"1. Introduction\nThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes a worldwide state of emergency that is unparalleled in recent times [1]. Countries all over the world have implemented unprecedented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in order to limit the spread of the novel viral disease, including regional- and national-level lockdowns and quarantine. As communities were closing down, concerns were raised about the impact of these interventions on other aspects of public health, including mental health [2]. In the wake of the first phase of the pandemic, evidence of its impact on mental health is emerging. Although limited, most current studies show an increased burden of mental health symptoms among psychiatric patients and healthcare workers and lower psychological well-being in the general population amid the COVID-19 outbreak [3]. Population-based studies have also revealed a high occurrence of self-reported psychological distress during the early phases of the pandemic in different populations [4,5,6].\nStress and emotional state influence the eating behavior. To many, stress and negative mood can induce loss of appetite and hypophagia [7,8]. However, for a major subset of individuals, negative emotions and stress cause them to eat more—a type of eating known as emotional eating [9]. Stress is known to induce a shift in individuals, making them favor hyperpalatable foods, i.e., calorie-dense foods high in fat and/or sugar content, and this tendency is stronger in emotional eaters [7,10]. Even under habitual circumstances, emotional eaters consume more energy-dense and sweet snack foods than others [11,12]. There is evidence emerging that points to the role of emotional eating as a behavioral mechanism mediating the association of depression with adverse weight gain [13,14]. Thus, emotional eating may pose an additional health burden to those vulnerable to eating more, and more unhealthily, during moments of hardship and distress.\nCOVID-19 represents a major disruption on the day-to-day life of most people in affected areas. There is reason to believe that the pandemic has an impact on the eating habits not only due to the practical effects of the lockdown, but also through its effect on perceived stress and psychological well-being. Current studies on eating habits amid the COVID-19 outbreak reveal a shift in self-reported eating towards increased appetite and overall food consumption, as well as increased snacking in-between meals [15,16,17]. A study regarding the most critical phase of the first Italian lockdown shows a substantial prevalence of emotional eating in the population, in particular among those that reported feeling depressed or anxious [4]. Similarly, a Chinese study on emotional eating and gestational weight gain amid the pandemic found that women who worried about COVID-19 had higher emotional eating scores [18]. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of emotional eating and its association with worries and psychological distress amid the COVID-19 lockdown through a large-scale population-based study in a major city in Norway. Our main research questions were:How prevalent was emotional eating among females and males in different age groups during the COVID-19 lockdown?\nDid the consumption of high-sugar foods and beverages differ between the overall population and those experiencing COVID-19-related worries or psychological distress?\nWas emotional eating associated with levels of COVID-19-related worries or psychological distress?"}