PMC:7589389 / 29669-30810 JSONTXT

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T65","span":{"begin":367,"end":375},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"T66","span":{"begin":641,"end":649},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A65","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T65","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"},{"id":"A66","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T66","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":"Considering the potential measurement bias on test variables might drive the empirical results, we replace the CIPHT with alternative variables CIPHT2 and CIPHT3 and rerun the regression. Here, CIPHT2 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least seven consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise; and CIPHT3 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least five consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise. Table 5 shows the relation between alternative measures of continued increasing public health threats and accumulative abnormal return. Both alternative measures (i.e., CIPHT2 and CIPHT3) are negatively and significantly related to CAR [−1, 1] and CAR [−2, 2], which reinforces our inference that continued increasing public health threats play an important role in increasing investors’ risk assessment."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T142","span":{"begin":46,"end":50},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000473"},{"id":"T143","span":{"begin":969,"end":976},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0009955"},{"id":"T144","span":{"begin":985,"end":988},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0002199"},{"id":"T145","span":{"begin":991,"end":995},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0050507"}],"text":"Considering the potential measurement bias on test variables might drive the empirical results, we replace the CIPHT with alternative variables CIPHT2 and CIPHT3 and rerun the regression. Here, CIPHT2 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least seven consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise; and CIPHT3 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least five consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise. Table 5 shows the relation between alternative measures of continued increasing public health threats and accumulative abnormal return. Both alternative measures (i.e., CIPHT2 and CIPHT3) are negatively and significantly related to CAR [−1, 1] and CAR [−2, 2], which reinforces our inference that continued increasing public health threats play an important role in increasing investors’ risk assessment."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CHEBI","denotations":[{"id":"T15","span":{"begin":298,"end":307},"obj":"Chemical"},{"id":"T16","span":{"begin":572,"end":581},"obj":"Chemical"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A15","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T15","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_47867"},{"id":"A16","pred":"chebi_id","subj":"T16","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_47867"}],"text":"Considering the potential measurement bias on test variables might drive the empirical results, we replace the CIPHT with alternative variables CIPHT2 and CIPHT3 and rerun the regression. Here, CIPHT2 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least seven consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise; and CIPHT3 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least five consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise. Table 5 shows the relation between alternative measures of continued increasing public health threats and accumulative abnormal return. Both alternative measures (i.e., CIPHT2 and CIPHT3) are negatively and significantly related to CAR [−1, 1] and CAR [−2, 2], which reinforces our inference that continued increasing public health threats play an important role in increasing investors’ risk assessment."}

{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T217","span":{"begin":0,"end":187},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T218","span":{"begin":188,"end":736},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T219","span":{"begin":737,"end":872},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T220","span":{"begin":873,"end":1141},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Considering the potential measurement bias on test variables might drive the empirical results, we replace the CIPHT with alternative variables CIPHT2 and CIPHT3 and rerun the regression. Here, CIPHT2 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least seven consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise; and CIPHT3 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least five consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise. Table 5 shows the relation between alternative measures of continued increasing public health threats and accumulative abnormal return. Both alternative measures (i.e., CIPHT2 and CIPHT3) are negatively and significantly related to CAR [−1, 1] and CAR [−2, 2], which reinforces our inference that continued increasing public health threats play an important role in increasing investors’ risk assessment."}

{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"184","span":{"begin":367,"end":375},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"185","span":{"begin":641,"end":649},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A184","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"184","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A185","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"185","obj":"MESH:C000657245"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Considering the potential measurement bias on test variables might drive the empirical results, we replace the CIPHT with alternative variables CIPHT2 and CIPHT3 and rerun the regression. Here, CIPHT2 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least seven consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise; and CIPHT3 is an alternative variable for continued increasing public health threats that is measured as an indicator variable that equals one if there have been provincial new COVID-19 cases for at least five consecutive days including the current day and zero otherwise. Table 5 shows the relation between alternative measures of continued increasing public health threats and accumulative abnormal return. Both alternative measures (i.e., CIPHT2 and CIPHT3) are negatively and significantly related to CAR [−1, 1] and CAR [−2, 2], which reinforces our inference that continued increasing public health threats play an important role in increasing investors’ risk assessment."}