> top > docs > PMC:7574920 > spans > 25037-25754 > annotations

PMC:7574920 / 25037-25754 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

LitCovid-PD-CLO

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T224 62-63 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T225 175-176 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T226 271-273 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001387 denotes 4C
T227 339-340 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020 denotes a
T228 359-361 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001000 denotes 35

LitCovid-PD-GO-BP

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T148 40-42 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001171 denotes RT
T149 309-311 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001171 denotes RT
T150 614-616 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001171 denotes RT
T151 703-705 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0001171 denotes RT

LitCovid-sentences

Id Subject Object Predicate Lexical cue
T184 104-216 Sentence denotes At this time point, many of the negative samples and also samples with a CT between 30 and 40 had turned yellow.
T185 217-275 Sentence denotes LAMP-sequencing eliminated all of these samples (Fig. 4C).
T186 276-515 Sentence denotes This indicated that even for the RT-qPCR–positive samples with a CT between 30 and 35, the color change that took place at time points > 30 min was caused by spurious amplification products and not by late amplification of viral sequences.
T187 516-717 Sentence denotes These results therefore confirmed that LAMP-sequencing was able to assess the results of multiple RT-LAMP reactions in parallel and to identify false-positive samples in the colorimetric RT-LAMP assay.