PMC:7546139 / 24442-25553
Annnotations
LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-FMA-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T107","span":{"begin":173,"end":183},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T108","span":{"begin":363,"end":368},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T109","span":{"begin":457,"end":466},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T110","span":{"begin":760,"end":775},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T111","span":{"begin":1029,"end":1037},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T112","span":{"begin":1061,"end":1071},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A107","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T107","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma75150"},{"id":"A108","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T108","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma314001"},{"id":"A109","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T109","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma75150"},{"id":"A110","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T110","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma75152"},{"id":"A111","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T111","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma76576"},{"id":"A112","pred":"fma_id","subj":"T112","obj":"http://purl.org/sig/ont/fma/fma75150"}],"text":"How it works and clinical effectiveness\nART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions."}
LitCovid-PD-UBERON
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-UBERON","denotations":[{"id":"T55","span":{"begin":173,"end":183},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T56","span":{"begin":457,"end":466},"obj":"Body_part"},{"id":"T57","span":{"begin":1061,"end":1071},"obj":"Body_part"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A55","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T55","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003672"},{"id":"A56","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T56","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003672"},{"id":"A57","pred":"uberon_id","subj":"T57","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0003672"}],"text":"How it works and clinical effectiveness\nART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions."}
LitCovid-PD-CLO
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T147","span":{"begin":353,"end":362},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001353"},{"id":"T148","span":{"begin":486,"end":487},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T149","span":{"begin":512,"end":513},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T150","span":{"begin":750,"end":759},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001353"},{"id":"T151","span":{"begin":978,"end":979},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0001020"},{"id":"T152","span":{"begin":1029,"end":1037},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002553"}],"text":"How it works and clinical effectiveness\nART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions."}
LitCovid-sentences
{"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T226","span":{"begin":0,"end":39},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T227","span":{"begin":40,"end":511},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T228","span":{"begin":512,"end":957},"obj":"Sentence"},{"id":"T229","span":{"begin":958,"end":1111},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"How it works and clinical effectiveness\nART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions."}
LitCovid-PD-HP
{"project":"LitCovid-PD-HP","denotations":[{"id":"T31","span":{"begin":163,"end":183},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T32","span":{"begin":447,"end":466},"obj":"Phenotype"},{"id":"T33","span":{"begin":932,"end":938},"obj":"Phenotype"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A31","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T31","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0008498"},{"id":"A32","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T32","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0008498"},{"id":"A33","pred":"hp_id","subj":"T33","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0000670"}],"text":"How it works and clinical effectiveness\nART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions."}
LitCovid-PubTator
{"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"229","span":{"begin":226,"end":240},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A229","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"229","obj":"MESH:D006333"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"How it works and clinical effectiveness\nART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73 Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However, ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions."}