PMC:7545501 / 784-1141 JSONTXT

Annnotations TAB JSON ListView MergeView

    LitCovid-PD-MONDO

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-MONDO","denotations":[{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":301,"end":309},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A2","pred":"mondo_id","subj":"T2","obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MONDO_0100096"}],"text":"Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index’s approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality."}

    LitCovid-PD-CLO

    {"project":"LitCovid-PD-CLO","denotations":[{"id":"T2","span":{"begin":191,"end":196},"obj":"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CLO_0009985"}],"text":"Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index’s approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality."}

    LitCovid-sentences

    {"project":"LitCovid-sentences","denotations":[{"id":"T7","span":{"begin":0,"end":357},"obj":"Sentence"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"_base","uri":"http://pubannotation.org/ontology/tao.owl#"}],"text":"Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index’s approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality."}

    LitCovid-PubTator

    {"project":"LitCovid-PubTator","denotations":[{"id":"6","span":{"begin":66,"end":69},"obj":"Gene"},{"id":"10","span":{"begin":301,"end":309},"obj":"Disease"},{"id":"11","span":{"begin":347,"end":356},"obj":"Disease"}],"attributes":[{"id":"A6","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"6","obj":"Gene:7971"},{"id":"A10","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"10","obj":"MESH:C000657245"},{"id":"A11","pred":"tao:has_database_id","subj":"11","obj":"MESH:D003643"}],"namespaces":[{"prefix":"Tax","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/"},{"prefix":"MESH","uri":"https://id.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/"},{"prefix":"Gene","uri":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/"},{"prefix":"CVCL","uri":"https://web.expasy.org/cellosaurus/CVCL_"}],"text":"Some scholars have recently offered constructive critiques of the GHS Index’s approach to scoring and ranking countries; its weighting of select indicators; its emphasis on transparency; its focus on biosecurity and biosafety capacities; and divergence between select country scores and corresponding COVID-19-associated caseloads, morbidity, and mortality."}